nodejs-best-practices
Node.js development principles and decision-making. Framework selection, async patterns, security, and architecture. Teaches thinking, not copying.
- License 许可
- MIT
- 最近更新
- 2026-11-14
- Stars
- ★ 3.3w
- Forks
- 3.9k
01 前言 Front Matter
- name
- nodejs-best-practices
- description
- Node.js development principles and decision-making. Framework selection, async patterns, security, and architecture. Teaches thinking, not copying.
- allowed-tools
- Read, Write, Edit, Glob, Grep
02 资源文件 4
- 参考文档references/api_reference.md12.8 KB
- 脚本scripts/basic_protocol_template.py1.5 KB
- 脚本scripts/pcr_setup_template.py4.4 KB
- 脚本scripts/serial_dilution_template.py3.1 KB
03 SKILL.md 正文
Node.js Best Practices
Principles and decision-making for Node.js development in 2025. Learn to THINK, not memorize code patterns.
⚠️ How to Use This Skill
This skill teaches decision-making principles, not fixed code to copy.
- ASK user for preferences when unclear
- Choose framework/pattern based on CONTEXT
- Don't default to same solution every time
1. Framework Selection (2025)
Decision Tree
What are you building?
│
├── Edge/Serverless (Cloudflare, Vercel)
│ └── Hono (zero-dependency, ultra-fast cold starts)
│
├── High Performance API
│ └── Fastify (2-3x faster than Express)
│
├── Enterprise/Team familiarity
│ └── NestJS (structured, DI, decorators)
│
├── Legacy/Stable/Maximum ecosystem
│ └── Express (mature, most middleware)
│
└── Full-stack with frontend
└── Next.js API Routes or tRPC
Comparison Principles
| Factor | Hono | Fastify | Express |
|---|---|---|---|
| Best for | Edge, serverless | Performance | Legacy, learning |
| Cold start | Fastest | Fast | Moderate |
| Ecosystem | Growing | Good | Largest |
| TypeScript | Native | Excellent | Good |
| Learning curve | Low | Medium | Low |
Selection Questions to Ask:
- What's the deployment target?
- Is cold start time critical?
- Does team have existing experience?
- Is there legacy code to maintain?
2. Runtime Considerations (2025)
Native TypeScript
Node.js 22+: --experimental-strip-types
├── Run .ts files directly
├── No build step needed for simple projects
└── Consider for: scripts, simple APIs
Module System Decision
ESM (import/export)
├── Modern standard
├── Better tree-shaking
├── Async module loading
└── Use for: new projects
CommonJS (require)
├── Legacy compatibility
├── More npm packages support
└── Use for: existing codebases, some edge cases
Runtime Selection
| Runtime | Best For |
|---|---|
| Node.js | General purpose, largest ecosystem |
| Bun | Performance, built-in bundler |
| Deno | Security-first, built-in TypeScript |
3. Architecture Principles
Layered Structure Concept
Request Flow:
│
├── Controller/Route Layer
│ ├── Handles HTTP specifics
│ ├── Input validation at boundary
│ └── Calls service layer
│
├── Service Layer
│ ├── Business logic
│ ├── Framework-agnostic
│ └── Calls repository layer
│
└── Repository Layer
├── Data access only
├── Database queries
└── ORM interactions
Why This Matters:
- Testability: Mock layers independently
- Flexibility: Swap database without touching business logic
- Clarity: Each layer has single responsibility
When to Simplify:
- Small scripts → Single file OK
- Prototypes → Less structure acceptable
- Always ask: "Will this grow?"
4. Error Handling Principles
Centralized Error Handling
Pattern:
├── Create custom error classes
├── Throw from any layer
├── Catch at top level (middleware)
└── Format consistent response
Error Response Philosophy
Client gets:
├── Appropriate HTTP status
├── Error code for programmatic handling
├── User-friendly message
└── NO internal details (security!)
Logs get:
├── Full stack trace
├── Request context
├── User ID (if applicable)
└── Timestamp
Status Code Selection
| Situation | Status | When |
|---|---|---|
| Bad input | 400 | Client sent invalid data |
| No auth | 401 | Missing or invalid credentials |
| No permission | 403 | Valid auth, but not allowed |
| Not found | 404 | Resource doesn't exist |
| Conflict | 409 | Duplicate or state conflict |
| Validation | 422 | Schema valid but business rules fail |
| Server error | 500 | Our fault, log everything |
5. Async Patterns Principles
When to Use Each
| Pattern | Use When |
|---|---|
async/await |
Sequential async operations |
Promise.all |
Parallel independent operations |
Promise.allSettled |
Parallel where some can fail |
Promise.race |
Timeout or first response wins |
Event Loop Awareness
I/O-bound (async helps):
├── Database queries
├── HTTP requests
├── File system
└── Network operations
CPU-bound (async doesn't help):
├── Crypto operations
├── Image processing
├── Complex calculations
└── → Use worker threads or offload
Avoiding Event Loop Blocking
- Never use sync methods in production (fs.readFileSync, etc.)
- Offload CPU-intensive work
- Use streaming for large data
6. Validation Principles
Validate at Boundaries
Where to validate:
├── API entry point (request body/params)
├── Before database operations
├── External data (API responses, file uploads)
└── Environment variables (startup)
Validation Library Selection
| Library | Best For |
|---|---|
| Zod | TypeScript first, inference |
| Valibot | Smaller bundle (tree-shakeable) |
| ArkType | Performance critical |
| Yup | Existing React Form usage |
Validation Philosophy
- Fail fast: Validate early
- Be specific: Clear error messages
- Don't trust: Even "internal" data
7. Security Principles
Security Checklist (Not Code)
- [ ] Input validation: All inputs validated
- [ ] Parameterized queries: No string concatenation for SQL
- [ ] Password hashing: bcrypt or argon2
- [ ] JWT verification: Always verify signature and expiry
- [ ] Rate limiting: Protect from abuse
- [ ] Security headers: Helmet.js or equivalent
- [ ] HTTPS: Everywhere in production
- [ ] CORS: Properly configured
- [ ] Secrets: Environment variables only
- [ ] Dependencies: Regularly audited
Security Mindset
Trust nothing:
├── Query params → validate
├── Request body → validate
├── Headers → verify
├── Cookies → validate
├── File uploads → scan
└── External APIs → validate response
8. Testing Principles
Test Strategy Selection
| Type | Purpose | Tools |
|---|---|---|
| Unit | Business logic | node:test, Vitest |
| Integration | API endpoints | Supertest |
| E2E | Full flows | Playwright |
What to Test (Priorities)
- Critical paths: Auth, payments, core business
- Edge cases: Empty inputs, boundaries
- Error handling: What happens when things fail?
- Not worth testing: Framework code, trivial getters
Built-in Test Runner (Node.js 22+)
node --test src/**/*.test.ts
├── No external dependency
├── Good coverage reporting
└── Watch mode available
10. Anti-Patterns to Avoid
❌ DON'T:
- Use Express for new edge projects (use Hono)
- Use sync methods in production code
- Put business logic in controllers
- Skip input validation
- Hardcode secrets
- Trust external data without validation
- Block event loop with CPU work
✅ DO:
- Choose framework based on context
- Ask user for preferences when unclear
- Use layered architecture for growing projects
- Validate all inputs
- Use environment variables for secrets
- Profile before optimizing
11. Decision Checklist
Before implementing:
- [ ] Asked user about stack preference?
- [ ] Chosen framework for THIS context? (not just default)
- [ ] Considered deployment target?
- [ ] Planned error handling strategy?
- [ ] Identified validation points?
- [ ] Considered security requirements?
Remember: Node.js best practices are about decision-making, not memorizing patterns. Every project deserves fresh consideration based on its requirements.
04 同仓库更多 Skills
wealthville-pool-scoring
Score DeFi liquidity pools before providing liquidity. Returns a 0-100 pool score and an Enter/Hold/Exit/Reduce/Avoid verdict with calibrated confidence for ~68,800 Solana pools and 575 EVM pools, plus a public miss-inclusive track record. Use when asked whether a pool is worth LPing into, which pools look best right now, or how accurate the scores have actually been.
technical-debt-auditor
Scans a codebase and produces a quantified technical debt report with a prioritized remediation plan. Analyzes dead code, TODO/FIXME/HACK markers, dependency staleness, complexity hotspots, code duplication signals, test coverage gaps, unused exports, and outdated patterns. Use this skill when the user asks to audit their codebase for tech debt, wants a health check of their code quality, says things like "where should I focus refactoring", "find code smells", "audit my codebase", "what technical debt do we have", "prioritize cleanup work", or asks about code quality metrics. Also trigger when the user mentions "code rot", "legacy cleanup", "refactoring priorities", or wants to understand the overall health of a project before a major effort. Trigger even if the user doesn't say "technical debt" explicitly — any request to systematically assess code quality and identify improvement priorities belongs here.
readonly-sql-guard
Make an agent's database access provably read-only. Use when an agent runs caller-supplied SQL against a production/ERP/analytics database (a "query" MCP tool, text-to-SQL, an admin console), or when reviewing DB-access code for write/DDL/side-effect/transaction-escape risks. Checks what a statement CALLS, not just its shape.
web-artifacts-builder
Suite of tools for creating elaborate, multi-component claude.ai HTML artifacts using modern frontend web technologies (React, Tailwind CSS, shadcn/ui). Use for complex artifacts requiring state management, routing, or shadcn/ui components - not for simple single-file HTML/JSX artifacts.
webapp-testing
Toolkit for interacting with and testing local web applications using Playwright. Supports verifying frontend functionality, debugging UI behavior, capturing browser screenshots, and viewing browser logs.
discernment-nudge
After you give a substantive answer or draft that the user may act on — advice or recommendations, drafted artifacts such as goals, plans, pitches, proposals, or emails, estimates or projections, analysis or interpretation of data, factual claims they may rely on, or a multi-step argument — invoke this skill BEFORE finalizing your reply and then, if it applies, append 2-3 short follow-up questions, each tied to something specific in what you just produced, that help the user check key facts, probe the reasoning or assumptions, and notice missing context. Do this at most once per conversation. Skip it when the user asked a trivial how-to or simple lookup, wants a purely educational explanation, asked you only to format, convert, or assemble a file from content they provided, is writing code they will run, is doing creative writing or casual chat, or already asked you to double-check, cite, or review — the skill file explains these boundaries and the exact output format.