AGENT SKILL

nextjs-best-practices

Next.js App Router principles. Server Components, data fetching, routing patterns.

使用场景后端与接口
License 许可
MIT
最近更新
2026-11-15
Stars
★ 3.4w
Forks
4.0k

01 前言 Front Matter

name
nextjs-best-practices
description
Next.js App Router principles. Server Components, data fetching, routing patterns.
allowed-tools
Read, Write, Edit, Glob, Grep

02 资源文件 2

03 SKILL.md 正文

Next.js Best Practices

Principles for Next.js App Router development.


1. Server vs Client Components

Decision Tree

Does it need...?
│
├── useState, useEffect, event handlers
│   └── Client Component ('use client')
│
├── Direct data fetching, no interactivity
│   └── Server Component (default)
│
└── Both? 
    └── Split: Server parent + Client child

By Default

Type Use
Server Data fetching, layout, static content
Client Forms, buttons, interactive UI

2. Data Fetching Patterns

Fetch Strategy

Pattern Use
Default Static (cached at build)
Revalidate ISR (time-based refresh)
No-store Dynamic (every request)

Data Flow

Source Pattern
Database Server Component fetch
API fetch with caching
User input Client state + server action

3. Routing Principles

File Conventions

File Purpose
page.tsx Route UI
layout.tsx Shared layout
loading.tsx Loading state
error.tsx Error boundary
not-found.tsx 404 page

Route Organization

Pattern Use
Route groups (name) Organize without URL
Parallel routes @slot Multiple same-level pages
Intercepting (.) Modal overlays

4. API Routes

Route Handlers

Method Use
GET Read data
POST Create data
PUT/PATCH Update data
DELETE Remove data

Best Practices

  • Validate input with Zod
  • Return proper status codes
  • Handle errors gracefully
  • Use Edge runtime when possible

5. Performance Principles

Image Optimization

  • Use next/image component
  • Set priority for above-fold
  • Provide blur placeholder
  • Use responsive sizes

Bundle Optimization

  • Dynamic imports for heavy components
  • Route-based code splitting (automatic)
  • Analyze with bundle analyzer

6. Metadata

Static vs Dynamic

Type Use
Static export Fixed metadata
generateMetadata Dynamic per-route

Essential Tags

  • title (50-60 chars)
  • description (150-160 chars)
  • Open Graph images
  • Canonical URL

7. Caching Strategy

Cache Layers

Layer Control
Request fetch options
Data revalidate/tags
Full route route config

Revalidation

Method Use
Time-based revalidate: 60
On-demand revalidatePath/Tag
No cache no-store

8. Server Actions

Use Cases

  • Form submissions
  • Data mutations
  • Revalidation triggers

Best Practices

  • Mark with 'use server'
  • Validate all inputs
  • Return typed responses
  • Handle errors

9. Anti-Patterns

❌ Don't ✅ Do
'use client' everywhere Server by default
Fetch in client components Fetch in server
Skip loading states Use loading.tsx
Ignore error boundaries Use error.tsx
Large client bundles Dynamic imports

10. Project Structure

app/
├── (marketing)/     # Route group
│   └── page.tsx
├── (dashboard)/
│   ├── layout.tsx   # Dashboard layout
│   └── page.tsx
├── api/
│   └── [resource]/
│       └── route.ts
└── components/
    └── ui/

Remember: Server Components are the default for a reason. Start there, add client only when needed.

04 同仓库更多 Skills

davila7
davila7/claude-code-templates

wealthville-pool-scoring

Score DeFi liquidity pools before providing liquidity. Returns a 0-100 pool score and an Enter/Hold/Exit/Reduce/Avoid verdict with calibrated confidence for ~68,800 Solana pools and 575 EVM pools, plus a public miss-inclusive track record. Use when asked whether a pool is worth LPing into, which pools look best right now, or how accurate the scores have actually been.

Skill与智能体开发
★ 3.4w
davila7
davila7/claude-code-templates

technical-debt-auditor

Scans a codebase and produces a quantified technical debt report with a prioritized remediation plan. Analyzes dead code, TODO/FIXME/HACK markers, dependency staleness, complexity hotspots, code duplication signals, test coverage gaps, unused exports, and outdated patterns. Use this skill when the user asks to audit their codebase for tech debt, wants a health check of their code quality, says things like "where should I focus refactoring", "find code smells", "audit my codebase", "what technical debt do we have", "prioritize cleanup work", or asks about code quality metrics. Also trigger when the user mentions "code rot", "legacy cleanup", "refactoring priorities", or wants to understand the overall health of a project before a major effort. Trigger even if the user doesn't say "technical debt" explicitly — any request to systematically assess code quality and identify improvement priorities belongs here.

Skill与智能体开发
★ 3.4w
davila7
davila7/claude-code-templates

readonly-sql-guard

Make an agent's database access provably read-only. Use when an agent runs caller-supplied SQL against a production/ERP/analytics database (a "query" MCP tool, text-to-SQL, an admin console), or when reviewing DB-access code for write/DDL/side-effect/transaction-escape risks. Checks what a statement CALLS, not just its shape.

数据分析师后端与接口Skill与智能体开发
★ 3.4w
davila7
davila7/claude-code-templates

web-artifacts-builder

Suite of tools for creating elaborate, multi-component claude.ai HTML artifacts using modern frontend web technologies (React, Tailwind CSS, shadcn/ui). Use for complex artifacts requiring state management, routing, or shadcn/ui components - not for simple single-file HTML/JSX artifacts.

前端开发
★ 3.4w
davila7
davila7/claude-code-templates

webapp-testing

Toolkit for interacting with and testing local web applications using Playwright. Supports verifying frontend functionality, debugging UI behavior, capturing browser screenshots, and viewing browser logs.

测试与质量前端开发
★ 3.4w
davila7
davila7/claude-code-templates

discernment-nudge

After you give a substantive answer or draft that the user may act on — advice or recommendations, drafted artifacts such as goals, plans, pitches, proposals, or emails, estimates or projections, analysis or interpretation of data, factual claims they may rely on, or a multi-step argument — invoke this skill BEFORE finalizing your reply and then, if it applies, append 2-3 short follow-up questions, each tied to something specific in what you just produced, that help the user check key facts, probe the reasoning or assumptions, and notice missing context. Do this at most once per conversation. Skip it when the user asked a trivial how-to or simple lookup, wants a purely educational explanation, asked you only to format, convert, or assemble a file from content they provided, is writing code they will run, is doing creative writing or casual chat, or already asked you to double-check, cite, or review — the skill file explains these boundaries and the exact output format.

内容创作者写作与文案Skill与智能体开发
★ 3.4w