git-commit-helper
Generate descriptive commit messages by analyzing git diffs. Use when the user asks for help writing commit messages or reviewing staged changes.
- License 许可
- MIT
- 最近更新
- 2026-11-14
- Stars
- ★ 3.3w
- Forks
- 3.9k
01 前言 Front Matter
- name
- git-commit-helper
- hooks
- { "PostToolUse": [ { "hooks": [ { "type": "command", "command": "echo \"[$(date)] Git Commit Helper: Analyzed git diff for commit message\" >> ~/.claude/git-commit-helper.log" } ], "matcher": "Bash" } ] }
- description
- Generate descriptive commit messages by analyzing git diffs. Use when the user asks for help writing commit messages or reviewing staged changes.
02 资源文件 5
- 参考文档references/filters_preprocessing.md12.4 KB
- 参考文档references/slide_management.md4.6 KB
- 参考文档references/tile_extraction.md11.0 KB
- 参考文档references/tissue_masks.md7.1 KB
- 参考文档references/visualization.md13.6 KB
03 SKILL.md 正文
Git Commit Helper
Quick start
Analyze staged changes and generate commit message:
# View staged changes
git diff --staged
# Generate commit message based on changes
# (Claude will analyze the diff and suggest a message)
Commit message format
Follow conventional commits format:
<type>(<scope>): <description>
[optional body]
[optional footer]
Types
- feat: New feature
- fix: Bug fix
- docs: Documentation changes
- style: Code style changes (formatting, missing semicolons)
- refactor: Code refactoring
- test: Adding or updating tests
- chore: Maintenance tasks
Examples
Feature commit:
feat(auth): add JWT authentication
Implement JWT-based authentication system with:
- Login endpoint with token generation
- Token validation middleware
- Refresh token support
Bug fix:
fix(api): handle null values in user profile
Prevent crashes when user profile fields are null.
Add null checks before accessing nested properties.
Refactor:
refactor(database): simplify query builder
Extract common query patterns into reusable functions.
Reduce code duplication in database layer.
Analyzing changes
Review what's being committed:
# Show files changed
git status
# Show detailed changes
git diff --staged
# Show statistics
git diff --staged --stat
# Show changes for specific file
git diff --staged path/to/file
Commit message guidelines
DO:
- Use imperative mood ("add feature" not "added feature")
- Keep first line under 50 characters
- Capitalize first letter
- No period at end of summary
- Explain WHY not just WHAT in body
DON'T:
- Use vague messages like "update" or "fix stuff"
- Include technical implementation details in summary
- Write paragraphs in summary line
- Use past tense
Multi-file commits
When committing multiple related changes:
refactor(core): restructure authentication module
- Move auth logic from controllers to service layer
- Extract validation into separate validators
- Update tests to use new structure
- Add integration tests for auth flow
Breaking change: Auth service now requires config object
Scope examples
Frontend:
feat(ui): add loading spinner to dashboardfix(form): validate email format
Backend:
feat(api): add user profile endpointfix(db): resolve connection pool leak
Infrastructure:
chore(ci): update Node version to 20feat(docker): add multi-stage build
Breaking changes
Indicate breaking changes clearly:
feat(api)!: restructure API response format
BREAKING CHANGE: All API responses now follow JSON:API spec
Previous format:
{ "data": {...}, "status": "ok" }
New format:
{ "data": {...}, "meta": {...} }
Migration guide: Update client code to handle new response structure
Template workflow
- Review changes:
git diff --staged - Identify type: Is it feat, fix, refactor, etc.?
- Determine scope: What part of the codebase?
- Write summary: Brief, imperative description
- Add body: Explain why and what impact
- Note breaking changes: If applicable
Interactive commit helper
Use git add -p for selective staging:
# Stage changes interactively
git add -p
# Review what's staged
git diff --staged
# Commit with message
git commit -m "type(scope): description"
Amending commits
Fix the last commit message:
# Amend commit message only
git commit --amend
# Amend and add more changes
git add forgotten-file.js
git commit --amend --no-edit
Best practices
- Atomic commits - One logical change per commit
- Test before commit - Ensure code works
- Reference issues - Include issue numbers if applicable
- Keep it focused - Don't mix unrelated changes
- Write for humans - Future you will read this
Commit message checklist
- [ ] Type is appropriate (feat/fix/docs/etc.)
- [ ] Scope is specific and clear
- [ ] Summary is under 50 characters
- [ ] Summary uses imperative mood
- [ ] Body explains WHY not just WHAT
- [ ] Breaking changes are clearly marked
- [ ] Related issue numbers are included
04 同仓库更多 Skills
wealthville-pool-scoring
Score DeFi liquidity pools before providing liquidity. Returns a 0-100 pool score and an Enter/Hold/Exit/Reduce/Avoid verdict with calibrated confidence for ~68,800 Solana pools and 575 EVM pools, plus a public miss-inclusive track record. Use when asked whether a pool is worth LPing into, which pools look best right now, or how accurate the scores have actually been.
technical-debt-auditor
Scans a codebase and produces a quantified technical debt report with a prioritized remediation plan. Analyzes dead code, TODO/FIXME/HACK markers, dependency staleness, complexity hotspots, code duplication signals, test coverage gaps, unused exports, and outdated patterns. Use this skill when the user asks to audit their codebase for tech debt, wants a health check of their code quality, says things like "where should I focus refactoring", "find code smells", "audit my codebase", "what technical debt do we have", "prioritize cleanup work", or asks about code quality metrics. Also trigger when the user mentions "code rot", "legacy cleanup", "refactoring priorities", or wants to understand the overall health of a project before a major effort. Trigger even if the user doesn't say "technical debt" explicitly — any request to systematically assess code quality and identify improvement priorities belongs here.
readonly-sql-guard
Make an agent's database access provably read-only. Use when an agent runs caller-supplied SQL against a production/ERP/analytics database (a "query" MCP tool, text-to-SQL, an admin console), or when reviewing DB-access code for write/DDL/side-effect/transaction-escape risks. Checks what a statement CALLS, not just its shape.
web-artifacts-builder
Suite of tools for creating elaborate, multi-component claude.ai HTML artifacts using modern frontend web technologies (React, Tailwind CSS, shadcn/ui). Use for complex artifacts requiring state management, routing, or shadcn/ui components - not for simple single-file HTML/JSX artifacts.
webapp-testing
Toolkit for interacting with and testing local web applications using Playwright. Supports verifying frontend functionality, debugging UI behavior, capturing browser screenshots, and viewing browser logs.
discernment-nudge
After you give a substantive answer or draft that the user may act on — advice or recommendations, drafted artifacts such as goals, plans, pitches, proposals, or emails, estimates or projections, analysis or interpretation of data, factual claims they may rely on, or a multi-step argument — invoke this skill BEFORE finalizing your reply and then, if it applies, append 2-3 short follow-up questions, each tied to something specific in what you just produced, that help the user check key facts, probe the reasoning or assumptions, and notice missing context. Do this at most once per conversation. Skip it when the user asked a trivial how-to or simple lookup, wants a purely educational explanation, asked you only to format, convert, or assemble a file from content they provided, is writing code they will run, is doing creative writing or casual chat, or already asked you to double-check, cite, or review — the skill file explains these boundaries and the exact output format.