command-creator
This skill should be used when creating a Claude Code slash command. Use when users ask to "create a command", "make a slash command", "add a command", or want to document a workflow as a reusable command. Essential for creating optimized, agent-executable slash commands with proper structure and best practices.
- License 许可
- MIT
- 最近更新
- 2026-11-14
- Stars
- ★ 3.3w
- Forks
- 3.9k
01 前言 Front Matter
- name
- command-creator
- description
- This skill should be used when creating a Claude Code slash command. Use when users ask to "create a command", "make a slash command", "add a command", or want to document a workflow as a reusable command. Essential for creating optimized, agent-executable slash commands with proper structure and best practices.
02 资源文件 4
- 参考文档README.md15.1 KB
- 参考文档references/best-practices.md13.5 KB
- 参考文档references/examples.md15.4 KB
- 参考文档references/patterns.md8.8 KB
03 SKILL.md 正文
Command Creator
This skill guides the creation of Claude Code slash commands - reusable workflows that can be invoked with /command-name in Claude Code conversations.
About Slash Commands
Slash commands are markdown files stored in .claude/commands/ (project-level) or ~/.claude/commands/ (global/user-level) that get expanded into prompts when invoked. They're ideal for:
- Repetitive workflows (code review, PR submission, CI fixing)
- Multi-step processes that need consistency
- Agent delegation patterns
- Project-specific automation
When to Use This Skill
Invoke this skill when users:
- Ask to "create a command" or "make a slash command"
- Want to automate a repetitive workflow
- Need to document a consistent process for reuse
- Say "I keep doing X, can we make a command for it?"
- Want to create project-specific or global commands
Bundled Resources
This skill includes reference documentation for detailed guidance:
- references/patterns.md - Command patterns (workflow automation, iterative fixing, agent delegation, simple execution)
- references/examples.md - Real command examples with full source (submit-stack, ensure-ci, create-implementation-plan)
- references/best-practices.md - Quality checklist, common pitfalls, writing guidelines, template structure
Load these references as needed when creating commands to understand patterns, see examples, or ensure quality.
Command Structure Overview
Every slash command is a markdown file with:
---
description: Brief description shown in /help (required)
argument-hint: <placeholder> (optional, if command takes arguments)
---
# Command Title
[Detailed instructions for the agent to execute autonomously]
Command Creation Workflow
Step 1: Determine Location
Auto-detect the appropriate location:
- Check git repository status:
git rev-parse --is-inside-work-tree 2>/dev/null - Default location:
- If in git repo → Project-level:
.claude/commands/ - If not in git repo → Global:
~/.claude/commands/
- If in git repo → Project-level:
- Allow user override:
- If user explicitly mentions "global" or "user-level" → Use
~/.claude/commands/ - If user explicitly mentions "project" or "project-level" → Use
.claude/commands/
- If user explicitly mentions "global" or "user-level" → Use
Report the chosen location to the user before proceeding.
Step 2: Show Command Patterns
Help the user understand different command types. Load references/patterns.md to see available patterns:
- Workflow Automation - Analyze → Act → Report (e.g., submit-stack)
- Iterative Fixing - Run → Parse → Fix → Repeat (e.g., ensure-ci)
- Agent Delegation - Context → Delegate → Iterate (e.g., create-implementation-plan)
- Simple Execution - Run command with args (e.g., codex-review)
Ask the user: "Which pattern is closest to what you want to create?" This helps frame the conversation.
Step 3: Gather Command Information
Ask the user for key information:
A. Command Name and Purpose
Ask:
- "What should the command be called?" (for filename)
- "What does this command do?" (for description field)
Guidelines:
- Command names MUST be kebab-case (hyphens, NOT underscores)
- ✅ CORRECT:
submit-stack,ensure-ci,create-from-plan - ❌ WRONG:
submit_stack,ensure_ci,create_from_plan
- ✅ CORRECT:
- File names match command names:
my-command.md→ invoked as/my-command - Description should be concise, action-oriented (appears in
/helpoutput)
B. Arguments
Ask:
- "Does this command take any arguments?"
- "Are arguments required or optional?"
- "What should arguments represent?"
If command takes arguments:
- Add
argument-hint: <placeholder>to frontmatter - Use
<angle-brackets>for required arguments - Use
[square-brackets]for optional arguments
C. Workflow Steps
Ask:
- "What are the specific steps this command should follow?"
- "What order should they happen in?"
- "What tools or commands should be used?"
Gather details about:
- Initial analysis or checks to perform
- Main actions to take
- How to handle results
- Success criteria
- Error handling approach
D. Tool Restrictions and Guidance
Ask:
- "Should this command use any specific agents or tools?"
- "Are there any tools or operations it should avoid?"
- "Should it read any specific files for context?"
Step 4: Generate Optimized Command
Create the command file with agent-optimized instructions. Load references/best-practices.md for:
- Template structure
- Best practices for agent execution
- Writing style guidelines
- Quality checklist
Key principles:
- Use imperative/infinitive form (verb-first instructions)
- Be explicit and specific
- Include expected outcomes
- Provide concrete examples
- Define clear error handling
Step 5: Create the Command File
-
Determine full file path:
- Project:
.claude/commands/[command-name].md - Global:
~/.claude/commands/[command-name].md
- Project:
-
Ensure directory exists:
mkdir -p [directory-path] -
Write the command file using the Write tool
-
Confirm with user:
- Report the file location
- Summarize what the command does
- Explain how to use it:
/command-name [arguments]
Step 6: Test and Iterate (Optional)
If the user wants to test:
- Suggest testing:
You can test this command by running: /command-name [arguments] - Be ready to iterate based on feedback
- Update the file with improvements as needed
Quick Tips
For detailed guidance, load the bundled references:
- Load references/patterns.md when designing the command workflow
- Load references/examples.md to see how existing commands are structured
- Load references/best-practices.md before finalizing to ensure quality
Common patterns to remember:
- Use Bash tool for
pytest,pyright,ruff,prettier,make,gtcommands - Use Task tool to invoke subagents for specialized tasks
- Check for specific files first (e.g.,
.PLAN.md) before proceeding - Mark todos complete immediately, not in batches
- Include explicit error handling instructions
- Define clear success criteria
Summary
When creating a command:
- Detect location (project vs global)
- Show patterns to frame the conversation
- Gather information (name, purpose, arguments, steps, tools)
- Generate optimized command with agent-executable instructions
- Create file at appropriate location
- Confirm and iterate as needed
Focus on creating commands that agents can execute autonomously, with clear steps, explicit tool usage, and proper error handling.
04 同仓库更多 Skills
wealthville-pool-scoring
Score DeFi liquidity pools before providing liquidity. Returns a 0-100 pool score and an Enter/Hold/Exit/Reduce/Avoid verdict with calibrated confidence for ~68,800 Solana pools and 575 EVM pools, plus a public miss-inclusive track record. Use when asked whether a pool is worth LPing into, which pools look best right now, or how accurate the scores have actually been.
technical-debt-auditor
Scans a codebase and produces a quantified technical debt report with a prioritized remediation plan. Analyzes dead code, TODO/FIXME/HACK markers, dependency staleness, complexity hotspots, code duplication signals, test coverage gaps, unused exports, and outdated patterns. Use this skill when the user asks to audit their codebase for tech debt, wants a health check of their code quality, says things like "where should I focus refactoring", "find code smells", "audit my codebase", "what technical debt do we have", "prioritize cleanup work", or asks about code quality metrics. Also trigger when the user mentions "code rot", "legacy cleanup", "refactoring priorities", or wants to understand the overall health of a project before a major effort. Trigger even if the user doesn't say "technical debt" explicitly — any request to systematically assess code quality and identify improvement priorities belongs here.
readonly-sql-guard
Make an agent's database access provably read-only. Use when an agent runs caller-supplied SQL against a production/ERP/analytics database (a "query" MCP tool, text-to-SQL, an admin console), or when reviewing DB-access code for write/DDL/side-effect/transaction-escape risks. Checks what a statement CALLS, not just its shape.
web-artifacts-builder
Suite of tools for creating elaborate, multi-component claude.ai HTML artifacts using modern frontend web technologies (React, Tailwind CSS, shadcn/ui). Use for complex artifacts requiring state management, routing, or shadcn/ui components - not for simple single-file HTML/JSX artifacts.
webapp-testing
Toolkit for interacting with and testing local web applications using Playwright. Supports verifying frontend functionality, debugging UI behavior, capturing browser screenshots, and viewing browser logs.
discernment-nudge
After you give a substantive answer or draft that the user may act on — advice or recommendations, drafted artifacts such as goals, plans, pitches, proposals, or emails, estimates or projections, analysis or interpretation of data, factual claims they may rely on, or a multi-step argument — invoke this skill BEFORE finalizing your reply and then, if it applies, append 2-3 short follow-up questions, each tied to something specific in what you just produced, that help the user check key facts, probe the reasoning or assumptions, and notice missing context. Do this at most once per conversation. Skip it when the user asked a trivial how-to or simple lookup, wants a purely educational explanation, asked you only to format, convert, or assemble a file from content they provided, is writing code they will run, is doing creative writing or casual chat, or already asked you to double-check, cite, or review — the skill file explains these boundaries and the exact output format.