claude-opus-4-5-migration
Migrate prompts and code from Claude Sonnet 4.0, Sonnet 4.5, or Opus 4.1 to Opus 4.5. Use when the user wants to update their codebase, prompts, or API calls to use Opus 4.5. Handles model string updates and prompt adjustments for known Opus 4.5 behavioral differences. Does NOT migrate Haiku 4.5.
- License 许可
- MIT
- 最近更新
- 2026-11-14
- Stars
- ★ 3.3w
- Forks
- 3.9k
01 前言 Front Matter
- name
- claude-opus-4-5-migration
- description
- Migrate prompts and code from Claude Sonnet 4.0, Sonnet 4.5, or Opus 4.1 to Opus 4.5. Use when the user wants to update their codebase, prompts, or API calls to use Opus 4.5. Handles model string updates and prompt adjustments for known Opus 4.5 behavioral differences. Does NOT migrate Haiku 4.5.
02 资源文件 2
- 参考文档references/effort.md1.7 KB
- 参考文档references/prompt-snippets.md6.0 KB
03 SKILL.md 正文
Opus 4.5 Migration Guide
One-shot migration from Sonnet 4.0, Sonnet 4.5, or Opus 4.1 to Opus 4.5.
Migration Workflow
- Search codebase for model strings and API calls
- Update model strings to Opus 4.5 (see platform-specific strings below)
- Remove unsupported beta headers
- Add effort parameter set to
"high"(seereferences/effort.md) - Summarize all changes made
- Tell the user: "If you encounter any issues with Opus 4.5, let me know and I can help adjust your prompts."
Model String Updates
Identify which platform the codebase uses, then replace model strings accordingly.
Unsupported Beta Headers
Remove the context-1m-2025-08-07 beta header if present—it is not yet supported with Opus 4.5. Leave a comment noting this:
# Note: 1M context beta (context-1m-2025-08-07) not yet supported with Opus 4.5
Target Model Strings (Opus 4.5)
| Platform | Opus 4.5 Model String |
|---|---|
| Anthropic API (1P) | claude-opus-4-5-20251101 |
| AWS Bedrock | anthropic.claude-opus-4-5-20251101-v1:0 |
| Google Vertex AI | claude-opus-4-5@20251101 |
| Azure AI Foundry | claude-opus-4-5-20251101 |
Source Model Strings to Replace
| Source Model | Anthropic API (1P) | AWS Bedrock | Google Vertex AI |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sonnet 4.0 | claude-sonnet-4-20250514 |
anthropic.claude-sonnet-4-20250514-v1:0 |
claude-sonnet-4@20250514 |
| Sonnet 4.5 | claude-sonnet-4-5-20250929 |
anthropic.claude-sonnet-4-5-20250929-v1:0 |
claude-sonnet-4-5@20250929 |
| Opus 4.1 | claude-opus-4-1-20250422 |
anthropic.claude-opus-4-1-20250422-v1:0 |
claude-opus-4-1@20250422 |
Do NOT migrate: Any Haiku models (e.g., claude-haiku-4-5-20251001).
Prompt Adjustments
Opus 4.5 has known behavioral differences from previous models. Only apply these fixes if the user explicitly requests them or reports a specific issue. By default, just update model strings.
Integration guidelines: When adding snippets, don't just append them to prompts. Integrate them thoughtfully:
- Use XML tags (e.g.,
<code_guidelines>,<tool_usage>) to organize additions - Match the style and structure of the existing prompt
- Place snippets in logical locations (e.g., coding guidelines near other coding instructions)
- If the prompt already uses XML tags, add new content within appropriate existing tags or create consistent new ones
1. Tool Overtriggering
Opus 4.5 is more responsive to system prompts. Aggressive language that prevented undertriggering on previous models may now cause overtriggering.
Apply if: User reports tools being called too frequently or unnecessarily.
Find and soften:
CRITICAL:→ remove or softenYou MUST...→You should...ALWAYS do X→Do XNEVER skip...→Don't skip...REQUIRED→ remove or soften
Only apply to tool-triggering instructions. Leave other uses of emphasis alone.
2. Over-Engineering Prevention
Opus 4.5 tends to create extra files, add unnecessary abstractions, or build unrequested flexibility.
Apply if: User reports unwanted files, excessive abstraction, or unrequested features. Add the snippet from references/prompt-snippets.md.
3. Code Exploration
Opus 4.5 can be overly conservative about exploring code, proposing solutions without reading files.
Apply if: User reports the model proposing fixes without inspecting relevant code. Add the snippet from references/prompt-snippets.md.
4. Frontend Design
Apply if: User requests improved frontend design quality or reports generic-looking outputs.
Add the frontend aesthetics snippet from references/prompt-snippets.md.
5. Thinking Sensitivity
When extended thinking is not enabled (the default), Opus 4.5 is particularly sensitive to the word "think" and its variants. Extended thinking is enabled only if the API request contains a thinking parameter.
Apply if: User reports issues related to "thinking" while extended thinking is not enabled (no thinking parameter in request).
Replace "think" with alternatives like "consider," "believe," or "evaluate."
Reference
See references/prompt-snippets.md for the full text of each snippet to add.
See references/effort.md for configuring the effort parameter (only if user requests it).
04 同仓库更多 Skills
wealthville-pool-scoring
Score DeFi liquidity pools before providing liquidity. Returns a 0-100 pool score and an Enter/Hold/Exit/Reduce/Avoid verdict with calibrated confidence for ~68,800 Solana pools and 575 EVM pools, plus a public miss-inclusive track record. Use when asked whether a pool is worth LPing into, which pools look best right now, or how accurate the scores have actually been.
technical-debt-auditor
Scans a codebase and produces a quantified technical debt report with a prioritized remediation plan. Analyzes dead code, TODO/FIXME/HACK markers, dependency staleness, complexity hotspots, code duplication signals, test coverage gaps, unused exports, and outdated patterns. Use this skill when the user asks to audit their codebase for tech debt, wants a health check of their code quality, says things like "where should I focus refactoring", "find code smells", "audit my codebase", "what technical debt do we have", "prioritize cleanup work", or asks about code quality metrics. Also trigger when the user mentions "code rot", "legacy cleanup", "refactoring priorities", or wants to understand the overall health of a project before a major effort. Trigger even if the user doesn't say "technical debt" explicitly — any request to systematically assess code quality and identify improvement priorities belongs here.
readonly-sql-guard
Make an agent's database access provably read-only. Use when an agent runs caller-supplied SQL against a production/ERP/analytics database (a "query" MCP tool, text-to-SQL, an admin console), or when reviewing DB-access code for write/DDL/side-effect/transaction-escape risks. Checks what a statement CALLS, not just its shape.
web-artifacts-builder
Suite of tools for creating elaborate, multi-component claude.ai HTML artifacts using modern frontend web technologies (React, Tailwind CSS, shadcn/ui). Use for complex artifacts requiring state management, routing, or shadcn/ui components - not for simple single-file HTML/JSX artifacts.
webapp-testing
Toolkit for interacting with and testing local web applications using Playwright. Supports verifying frontend functionality, debugging UI behavior, capturing browser screenshots, and viewing browser logs.
discernment-nudge
After you give a substantive answer or draft that the user may act on — advice or recommendations, drafted artifacts such as goals, plans, pitches, proposals, or emails, estimates or projections, analysis or interpretation of data, factual claims they may rely on, or a multi-step argument — invoke this skill BEFORE finalizing your reply and then, if it applies, append 2-3 short follow-up questions, each tied to something specific in what you just produced, that help the user check key facts, probe the reasoning or assumptions, and notice missing context. Do this at most once per conversation. Skip it when the user asked a trivial how-to or simple lookup, wants a purely educational explanation, asked you only to format, convert, or assemble a file from content they provided, is writing code they will run, is doing creative writing or casual chat, or already asked you to double-check, cite, or review — the skill file explains these boundaries and the exact output format.