cc-skill-project-guidelines-example
Project Guidelines Skill (Example)
- License 许可
- MIT
- 最近更新
- 2026-11-14
- Stars
- ★ 3.3w
- Forks
- 3.9k
01 前言 Front Matter
- name
- cc-skill-project-guidelines-example
- metadata
- { "author": "affaan-m", "version": "1.0" }
- description
- Project Guidelines Skill (Example)
03 SKILL.md 正文
Project Guidelines Skill (Example)
This is an example of a project-specific skill. Use this as a template for your own projects.
Based on a real production application: Zenith - AI-powered customer discovery platform.
When to Use
Reference this skill when working on the specific project it's designed for. Project skills contain:
- Architecture overview
- File structure
- Code patterns
- Testing requirements
- Deployment workflow
Architecture Overview
Tech Stack:
- Frontend: Next.js 15 (App Router), TypeScript, React
- Backend: FastAPI (Python), Pydantic models
- Database: Supabase (PostgreSQL)
- AI: Claude API with tool calling and structured output
- Deployment: Google Cloud Run
- Testing: Playwright (E2E), pytest (backend), React Testing Library
Services:
┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ Frontend │
│ Next.js 15 + TypeScript + TailwindCSS │
│ Deployed: Vercel / Cloud Run │
└─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘
│
▼
┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ Backend │
│ FastAPI + Python 3.11 + Pydantic │
│ Deployed: Cloud Run │
└─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘
│
┌───────────────┼───────────────┐
▼ ▼ ▼
┌──────────┐ ┌──────────┐ ┌──────────┐
│ Supabase │ │ Claude │ │ Redis │
│ Database │ │ API │ │ Cache │
└──────────┘ └──────────┘ └──────────┘
File Structure
project/
├── frontend/
│ └── src/
│ ├── app/ # Next.js app router pages
│ │ ├── api/ # API routes
│ │ ├── (auth)/ # Auth-protected routes
│ │ └── workspace/ # Main app workspace
│ ├── components/ # React components
│ │ ├── ui/ # Base UI components
│ │ ├── forms/ # Form components
│ │ └── layouts/ # Layout components
│ ├── hooks/ # Custom React hooks
│ ├── lib/ # Utilities
│ ├── types/ # TypeScript definitions
│ └── config/ # Configuration
│
├── backend/
│ ├── routers/ # FastAPI route handlers
│ ├── models.py # Pydantic models
│ ├── main.py # FastAPI app entry
│ ├── auth_system.py # Authentication
│ ├── database.py # Database operations
│ ├── services/ # Business logic
│ └── tests/ # pytest tests
│
├── deploy/ # Deployment configs
├── docs/ # Documentation
└── scripts/ # Utility scripts
Code Patterns
API Response Format (FastAPI)
from pydantic import BaseModel
from typing import Generic, TypeVar, Optional
T = TypeVar('T')
class ApiResponse(BaseModel, Generic[T]):
success: bool
data: Optional[T] = None
error: Optional[str] = None
@classmethod
def ok(cls, data: T) -> "ApiResponse[T]":
return cls(success=True, data=data)
@classmethod
def fail(cls, error: str) -> "ApiResponse[T]":
return cls(success=False, error=error)
Frontend API Calls (TypeScript)
interface ApiResponse<T> {
success: boolean
data?: T
error?: string
}
async function fetchApi<T>(
endpoint: string,
options?: RequestInit
): Promise<ApiResponse<T>> {
try {
const response = await fetch(`/api${endpoint}`, {
...options,
headers: {
'Content-Type': 'application/json',
...options?.headers,
},
})
if (!response.ok) {
return { success: false, error: `HTTP ${response.status}` }
}
return await response.json()
} catch (error) {
return { success: false, error: String(error) }
}
}
Claude AI Integration (Structured Output)
from anthropic import Anthropic
from pydantic import BaseModel
class AnalysisResult(BaseModel):
summary: str
key_points: list[str]
confidence: float
async def analyze_with_claude(content: str) -> AnalysisResult:
client = Anthropic()
response = client.messages.create(
model="claude-sonnet-4-5-20250514",
max_tokens=1024,
messages=[{"role": "user", "content": content}],
tools=[{
"name": "provide_analysis",
"description": "Provide structured analysis",
"input_schema": AnalysisResult.model_json_schema()
}],
tool_choice={"type": "tool", "name": "provide_analysis"}
)
# Extract tool use result
tool_use = next(
block for block in response.content
if block.type == "tool_use"
)
return AnalysisResult(**tool_use.input)
Custom Hooks (React)
import { useState, useCallback } from 'react'
interface UseApiState<T> {
data: T | null
loading: boolean
error: string | null
}
export function useApi<T>(
fetchFn: () => Promise<ApiResponse<T>>
) {
const [state, setState] = useState<UseApiState<T>>({
data: null,
loading: false,
error: null,
})
const execute = useCallback(async () => {
setState(prev => ({ ...prev, loading: true, error: null }))
const result = await fetchFn()
if (result.success) {
setState({ data: result.data!, loading: false, error: null })
} else {
setState({ data: null, loading: false, error: result.error! })
}
}, [fetchFn])
return { ...state, execute }
}
Testing Requirements
Backend (pytest)
# Run all tests
poetry run pytest tests/
# Run with coverage
poetry run pytest tests/ --cov=. --cov-report=html
# Run specific test file
poetry run pytest tests/test_auth.py -v
Test structure:
import pytest
from httpx import AsyncClient
from main import app
@pytest.fixture
async def client():
async with AsyncClient(app=app, base_url="http://test") as ac:
yield ac
@pytest.mark.asyncio
async def test_health_check(client: AsyncClient):
response = await client.get("/health")
assert response.status_code == 200
assert response.json()["status"] == "healthy"
Frontend (React Testing Library)
# Run tests
npm run test
# Run with coverage
npm run test -- --coverage
# Run E2E tests
npm run test:e2e
Test structure:
import { render, screen, fireEvent } from '@testing-library/react'
import { WorkspacePanel } from './WorkspacePanel'
describe('WorkspacePanel', () => {
it('renders workspace correctly', () => {
render(<WorkspacePanel />)
expect(screen.getByRole('main')).toBeInTheDocument()
})
it('handles session creation', async () => {
render(<WorkspacePanel />)
fireEvent.click(screen.getByText('New Session'))
expect(await screen.findByText('Session created')).toBeInTheDocument()
})
})
Deployment Workflow
Pre-Deployment Checklist
- [ ] All tests passing locally
- [ ]
npm run buildsucceeds (frontend) - [ ]
poetry run pytestpasses (backend) - [ ] No hardcoded secrets
- [ ] Environment variables documented
- [ ] Database migrations ready
Deployment Commands
# Build and deploy frontend
cd frontend && npm run build
gcloud run deploy frontend --source .
# Build and deploy backend
cd backend
gcloud run deploy backend --source .
Environment Variables
# Frontend (.env.local)
NEXT_PUBLIC_API_URL=https://api.example.com
NEXT_PUBLIC_SUPABASE_URL=https://xxx.supabase.co
NEXT_PUBLIC_SUPABASE_ANON_KEY=eyJ...
# Backend (.env)
DATABASE_URL=postgresql://...
ANTHROPIC_API_KEY=sk-ant-...
SUPABASE_URL=https://xxx.supabase.co
SUPABASE_KEY=eyJ...
Critical Rules
- No emojis in code, comments, or documentation
- Immutability - never mutate objects or arrays
- TDD - write tests before implementation
- 80% coverage minimum
- Many small files - 200-400 lines typical, 800 max
- No console.log in production code
- Proper error handling with try/catch
- Input validation with Pydantic/Zod
Related Skills
coding-standards.md- General coding best practicesbackend-patterns.md- API and database patternsfrontend-patterns.md- React and Next.js patternstdd-workflow/- Test-driven development methodology
04 同仓库更多 Skills
wealthville-pool-scoring
Score DeFi liquidity pools before providing liquidity. Returns a 0-100 pool score and an Enter/Hold/Exit/Reduce/Avoid verdict with calibrated confidence for ~68,800 Solana pools and 575 EVM pools, plus a public miss-inclusive track record. Use when asked whether a pool is worth LPing into, which pools look best right now, or how accurate the scores have actually been.
technical-debt-auditor
Scans a codebase and produces a quantified technical debt report with a prioritized remediation plan. Analyzes dead code, TODO/FIXME/HACK markers, dependency staleness, complexity hotspots, code duplication signals, test coverage gaps, unused exports, and outdated patterns. Use this skill when the user asks to audit their codebase for tech debt, wants a health check of their code quality, says things like "where should I focus refactoring", "find code smells", "audit my codebase", "what technical debt do we have", "prioritize cleanup work", or asks about code quality metrics. Also trigger when the user mentions "code rot", "legacy cleanup", "refactoring priorities", or wants to understand the overall health of a project before a major effort. Trigger even if the user doesn't say "technical debt" explicitly — any request to systematically assess code quality and identify improvement priorities belongs here.
readonly-sql-guard
Make an agent's database access provably read-only. Use when an agent runs caller-supplied SQL against a production/ERP/analytics database (a "query" MCP tool, text-to-SQL, an admin console), or when reviewing DB-access code for write/DDL/side-effect/transaction-escape risks. Checks what a statement CALLS, not just its shape.
web-artifacts-builder
Suite of tools for creating elaborate, multi-component claude.ai HTML artifacts using modern frontend web technologies (React, Tailwind CSS, shadcn/ui). Use for complex artifacts requiring state management, routing, or shadcn/ui components - not for simple single-file HTML/JSX artifacts.
webapp-testing
Toolkit for interacting with and testing local web applications using Playwright. Supports verifying frontend functionality, debugging UI behavior, capturing browser screenshots, and viewing browser logs.
discernment-nudge
After you give a substantive answer or draft that the user may act on — advice or recommendations, drafted artifacts such as goals, plans, pitches, proposals, or emails, estimates or projections, analysis or interpretation of data, factual claims they may rely on, or a multi-step argument — invoke this skill BEFORE finalizing your reply and then, if it applies, append 2-3 short follow-up questions, each tied to something specific in what you just produced, that help the user check key facts, probe the reasoning or assumptions, and notice missing context. Do this at most once per conversation. Skip it when the user asked a trivial how-to or simple lookup, wants a purely educational explanation, asked you only to format, convert, or assemble a file from content they provided, is writing code they will run, is doing creative writing or casual chat, or already asked you to double-check, cite, or review — the skill file explains these boundaries and the exact output format.