backend-dev-guidelines
Comprehensive backend development guide for Node.js/Express/TypeScript microservices. Use when creating routes, controllers, services, repositories, middleware, or working with Express APIs, Prisma database access, Sentry error tracking, Zod validation, unifiedConfig, dependency injection, or async patterns. Covers layered architecture (routes → controllers → services → repositories), BaseController pattern, error handling, performance monitoring, testing strategies, and migration from legacy patterns.
- License 许可
- MIT
- 最近更新
- 2026-11-14
- Stars
- ★ 3.3w
- Forks
- 3.9k
01 前言 Front Matter
- name
- backend-dev-guidelines
- description
- Comprehensive backend development guide for Node.js/Express/TypeScript microservices. Use when creating routes, controllers, services, repositories, middleware, or working with Express APIs, Prisma database access, Sentry error tracking, Zod validation, unifiedConfig, dependency injection, or async patterns. Covers layered architecture (routes → controllers → services → repositories), BaseController pattern, error handling, performance monitoring, testing strategies, and migration from legacy patterns.
02 资源文件 11
- 参考文档resources/architecture-overview.md12.6 KB
- 参考文档resources/async-and-errors.md6.7 KB
- 参考文档resources/complete-examples.md16.1 KB
- 参考文档resources/configuration.md5.7 KB
- 参考文档resources/database-patterns.md4.8 KB
- 参考文档resources/middleware-guide.md5.0 KB
- 参考文档resources/routing-and-controllers.md19.5 KB
- 参考文档resources/sentry-and-monitoring.md7.6 KB
- 参考文档resources/services-and-repositories.md21.8 KB
- 参考文档resources/testing-guide.md5.3 KB
- 参考文档resources/validation-patterns.md17.6 KB
03 SKILL.md 正文
Backend Development Guidelines
Purpose
Establish consistency and best practices across backend microservices (blog-api, auth-service, notifications-service) using modern Node.js/Express/TypeScript patterns.
When to Use This Skill
Automatically activates when working on:
- Creating or modifying routes, endpoints, APIs
- Building controllers, services, repositories
- Implementing middleware (auth, validation, error handling)
- Database operations with Prisma
- Error tracking with Sentry
- Input validation with Zod
- Configuration management
- Backend testing and refactoring
Quick Start
New Backend Feature Checklist
- [ ] Route: Clean definition, delegate to controller
- [ ] Controller: Extend BaseController
- [ ] Service: Business logic with DI
- [ ] Repository: Database access (if complex)
- [ ] Validation: Zod schema
- [ ] Sentry: Error tracking
- [ ] Tests: Unit + integration tests
- [ ] Config: Use unifiedConfig
New Microservice Checklist
- [ ] Directory structure (see architecture-overview.md)
- [ ] instrument.ts for Sentry
- [ ] unifiedConfig setup
- [ ] BaseController class
- [ ] Middleware stack
- [ ] Error boundary
- [ ] Testing framework
Architecture Overview
Layered Architecture
HTTP Request
↓
Routes (routing only)
↓
Controllers (request handling)
↓
Services (business logic)
↓
Repositories (data access)
↓
Database (Prisma)
Key Principle: Each layer has ONE responsibility.
See architecture-overview.md for complete details.
Directory Structure
service/src/
├── config/ # UnifiedConfig
├── controllers/ # Request handlers
├── services/ # Business logic
├── repositories/ # Data access
├── routes/ # Route definitions
├── middleware/ # Express middleware
├── types/ # TypeScript types
├── validators/ # Zod schemas
├── utils/ # Utilities
├── tests/ # Tests
├── instrument.ts # Sentry (FIRST IMPORT)
├── app.ts # Express setup
└── server.ts # HTTP server
Naming Conventions:
- Controllers:
PascalCase-UserController.ts - Services:
camelCase-userService.ts - Routes:
camelCase + Routes-userRoutes.ts - Repositories:
PascalCase + Repository-UserRepository.ts
Core Principles (7 Key Rules)
1. Routes Only Route, Controllers Control
// ❌ NEVER: Business logic in routes
router.post('/submit', async (req, res) => {
// 200 lines of logic
});
// ✅ ALWAYS: Delegate to controller
router.post('/submit', (req, res) => controller.submit(req, res));
2. All Controllers Extend BaseController
export class UserController extends BaseController {
async getUser(req: Request, res: Response): Promise<void> {
try {
const user = await this.userService.findById(req.params.id);
this.handleSuccess(res, user);
} catch (error) {
this.handleError(error, res, 'getUser');
}
}
}
3. All Errors to Sentry
try {
await operation();
} catch (error) {
Sentry.captureException(error);
throw error;
}
4. Use unifiedConfig, NEVER process.env
// ❌ NEVER
const timeout = process.env.TIMEOUT_MS;
// ✅ ALWAYS
import { config } from './config/unifiedConfig';
const timeout = config.timeouts.default;
5. Validate All Input with Zod
const schema = z.object({ email: z.string().email() });
const validated = schema.parse(req.body);
6. Use Repository Pattern for Data Access
// Service → Repository → Database
const users = await userRepository.findActive();
7. Comprehensive Testing Required
describe('UserService', () => {
it('should create user', async () => {
expect(user).toBeDefined();
});
});
Common Imports
// Express
import express, { Request, Response, NextFunction, Router } from 'express';
// Validation
import { z } from 'zod';
// Database
import { PrismaClient } from '@prisma/client';
import type { Prisma } from '@prisma/client';
// Sentry
import * as Sentry from '@sentry/node';
// Config
import { config } from './config/unifiedConfig';
// Middleware
import { SSOMiddlewareClient } from './middleware/SSOMiddleware';
import { asyncErrorWrapper } from './middleware/errorBoundary';
Quick Reference
HTTP Status Codes
| Code | Use Case |
|---|---|
| 200 | Success |
| 201 | Created |
| 400 | Bad Request |
| 401 | Unauthorized |
| 403 | Forbidden |
| 404 | Not Found |
| 500 | Server Error |
Service Templates
Blog API (✅ Mature) - Use as template for REST APIs Auth Service (✅ Mature) - Use as template for authentication patterns
Anti-Patterns to Avoid
❌ Business logic in routes ❌ Direct process.env usage ❌ Missing error handling ❌ No input validation ❌ Direct Prisma everywhere ❌ console.log instead of Sentry
Navigation Guide
| Need to... | Read this |
|---|---|
| Understand architecture | architecture-overview.md |
| Create routes/controllers | routing-and-controllers.md |
| Organize business logic | services-and-repositories.md |
| Validate input | validation-patterns.md |
| Add error tracking | sentry-and-monitoring.md |
| Create middleware | middleware-guide.md |
| Database access | database-patterns.md |
| Manage config | configuration.md |
| Handle async/errors | async-and-errors.md |
| Write tests | testing-guide.md |
| See examples | complete-examples.md |
Resource Files
architecture-overview.md
Layered architecture, request lifecycle, separation of concerns
routing-and-controllers.md
Route definitions, BaseController, error handling, examples
services-and-repositories.md
Service patterns, DI, repository pattern, caching
validation-patterns.md
Zod schemas, validation, DTO pattern
sentry-and-monitoring.md
Sentry init, error capture, performance monitoring
middleware-guide.md
Auth, audit, error boundaries, AsyncLocalStorage
database-patterns.md
PrismaService, repositories, transactions, optimization
configuration.md
UnifiedConfig, environment configs, secrets
async-and-errors.md
Async patterns, custom errors, asyncErrorWrapper
testing-guide.md
Unit/integration tests, mocking, coverage
complete-examples.md
Full examples, refactoring guide
Related Skills
- database-verification - Verify column names and schema consistency
- error-tracking - Sentry integration patterns
- skill-developer - Meta-skill for creating and managing skills
Skill Status: COMPLETE ✅ Line Count: < 500 ✅ Progressive Disclosure: 11 resource files ✅
04 同仓库更多 Skills
wealthville-pool-scoring
Score DeFi liquidity pools before providing liquidity. Returns a 0-100 pool score and an Enter/Hold/Exit/Reduce/Avoid verdict with calibrated confidence for ~68,800 Solana pools and 575 EVM pools, plus a public miss-inclusive track record. Use when asked whether a pool is worth LPing into, which pools look best right now, or how accurate the scores have actually been.
technical-debt-auditor
Scans a codebase and produces a quantified technical debt report with a prioritized remediation plan. Analyzes dead code, TODO/FIXME/HACK markers, dependency staleness, complexity hotspots, code duplication signals, test coverage gaps, unused exports, and outdated patterns. Use this skill when the user asks to audit their codebase for tech debt, wants a health check of their code quality, says things like "where should I focus refactoring", "find code smells", "audit my codebase", "what technical debt do we have", "prioritize cleanup work", or asks about code quality metrics. Also trigger when the user mentions "code rot", "legacy cleanup", "refactoring priorities", or wants to understand the overall health of a project before a major effort. Trigger even if the user doesn't say "technical debt" explicitly — any request to systematically assess code quality and identify improvement priorities belongs here.
readonly-sql-guard
Make an agent's database access provably read-only. Use when an agent runs caller-supplied SQL against a production/ERP/analytics database (a "query" MCP tool, text-to-SQL, an admin console), or when reviewing DB-access code for write/DDL/side-effect/transaction-escape risks. Checks what a statement CALLS, not just its shape.
web-artifacts-builder
Suite of tools for creating elaborate, multi-component claude.ai HTML artifacts using modern frontend web technologies (React, Tailwind CSS, shadcn/ui). Use for complex artifacts requiring state management, routing, or shadcn/ui components - not for simple single-file HTML/JSX artifacts.
webapp-testing
Toolkit for interacting with and testing local web applications using Playwright. Supports verifying frontend functionality, debugging UI behavior, capturing browser screenshots, and viewing browser logs.
discernment-nudge
After you give a substantive answer or draft that the user may act on — advice or recommendations, drafted artifacts such as goals, plans, pitches, proposals, or emails, estimates or projections, analysis or interpretation of data, factual claims they may rely on, or a multi-step argument — invoke this skill BEFORE finalizing your reply and then, if it applies, append 2-3 short follow-up questions, each tied to something specific in what you just produced, that help the user check key facts, probe the reasoning or assumptions, and notice missing context. Do this at most once per conversation. Skip it when the user asked a trivial how-to or simple lookup, wants a purely educational explanation, asked you only to format, convert, or assemble a file from content they provided, is writing code they will run, is doing creative writing or casual chat, or already asked you to double-check, cite, or review — the skill file explains these boundaries and the exact output format.