reviewing-oracle-to-postgres-migration
Identifies Oracle-to-PostgreSQL migration risks by cross-referencing code against known behavioral differences (empty strings, refcursors, type coercion, sorting/collations, UNION ALL planner risks, materialized-view refresh requirements, timestamps, concurrent transactions, etc.). Use when planning a database migration, reviewing migration artifacts, or validating that integration tests cover Oracle/PostgreSQL differences.
- License 许可
- MIT
- 最近更新
- 2026-11-14
- Stars
- ★ 4.1w
- Forks
- 5.4k
01 前言 Front Matter
- name
- reviewing-oracle-to-postgres-migration
- description
- Identifies Oracle-to-PostgreSQL migration risks by cross-referencing code against known behavioral differences (empty strings, refcursors, type coercion, sorting/collations, UNION ALL planner risks, materialized-view refresh requirements, timestamps, concurrent transactions, etc.). Use when planning a database migration, reviewing migration artifacts, or validating that integration tests cover Oracle/PostgreSQL differences.
02 资源文件 16
- 参考文档agents/openai.yaml158 B
- 参考文档references/empty-strings-handling.md2.0 KB
- 参考文档references/no-data-found-exceptions.md2.6 KB
- 参考文档references/oracle-nvl-decode-functions.md2.4 KB
- 参考文档references/oracle-parentheses-from-clause.md4.8 KB
- 参考文档references/oracle-rownum-pagination.md2.1 KB
- 参考文档references/oracle-sysdate-sequences-dual.md3.2 KB
- 参考文档references/oracle-to-postgres-sorting.md2.7 KB
- 参考文档references/oracle-to-postgres-timestamp-timezone.md8.4 KB
- 参考文档references/oracle-to-postgres-to-char-numeric.md4.2 KB
- 参考文档references/oracle-to-postgres-type-coercion.md4.9 KB
- 参考文档references/postgres-concurrent-transactions.md9.4 KB
- 参考文档references/postgres-materialized-view-refresh.md1.4 KB
- 参考文档references/postgres-refcursor-handling.md5.7 KB
- 参考文档references/postgres-union-all-planner.md1.6 KB
- 参考文档references/REFERENCE.md2.8 KB
03 SKILL.md 正文
Oracle-to-PostgreSQL Database Migration
Surfaces migration risks and validates migration work against known Oracle/PostgreSQL behavioral differences documented in the references/ folder.
When to use
- Planning — Before starting migration work on a procedure, trigger, query, or refcursor client. Identify which reference insights apply so risks are addressed up front.
- Validating — After migration work is done, confirm every applicable insight was addressed and integration tests cover the new PostgreSQL semantics.
Workflow
Determine the task type:
Planning a migration? Follow the risk assessment workflow. Validating completed work? Follow the validation workflow.
Risk assessment workflow (planning)
Risk Assessment:
- [ ] Step 1: Identify the migration scope
- [ ] Step 2: Screen each insight for applicability
- [ ] Step 3: Document risks and recommended actions
Step 1: Identify the migration scope
List the affected database objects (procedures, triggers, queries, views) and the application code that calls them.
Step 2: Screen each insight for applicability
Review the reference index in references/REFERENCE.md. For each entry, determine whether the migration scope contains patterns affected by that insight. Read the full reference file only when the insight is potentially relevant.
Step 3: Document risks and recommended actions
For each applicable insight, note the specific risk and the recommended fix pattern from the reference file. Flag any insight that requires a design decision (e.g., whether to preserve Oracle empty-string-as-NULL semantics or adopt PostgreSQL behavior).
Validation workflow (post-migration)
Validation:
- [ ] Step 1: Map the migration artifact
- [ ] Step 2: Cross-check applicable insights
- [ ] Step 3: Verify integration test coverage
- [ ] Step 4: Gate the result
Step 1: Map the migration artifact
Identify the migrated object and summarize the change set.
Step 2: Cross-check applicable insights
For each reference in references/REFERENCE.md, confirm the behavior or test requirement is acknowledged and addressed in the migration work.
Step 3: Verify integration test coverage
Confirm tests exercise both the happy path and the failure scenarios highlighted in applicable insights (exceptions, sorting, UNION ALL behavior/performance risks, refcursor consumption, concurrent transactions, timestamps, materialized-view freshness, etc.).
Step 4: Gate the result
Return a checklist asserting each applicable insight was addressed, migration scripts run, and integration tests pass.
04 同仓库更多 Skills
supabase-rls-policies
Write, review, and test Supabase Row Level Security (RLS) policies so that one user cannot read or change another user's rows. Use when creating or changing tables, policies, views, or security definer functions in a Supabase project, when reviewing a migration that touches RLS, or when asked to prove user isolation with pgTAP tests that sign in as two users.
skill-distribution-audit
Audit a skill collection before release or investigate installer omissions, archived/template leakage, duplicate identities, and manifest drift. Reconcile the intended public source set, distribution manifest, and actual discovery output for a specified consumer version. Includes a deterministic set-comparison helper.
logicapps-custom-code-net10-migration
Migrate Azure Logic Apps Standard local-function custom-code projects from .NET 8 to .NET 10. Use for legacy Logic Apps custom-code workspace upgrades, project/package configuration, custom-worker settings, publication, and integrated VS Code debugging. Not for ordinary .NET applications, standalone Azure Functions, Consumption workflows, or cloud deployment.
winmd-api-search
Find and explore Windows desktop APIs. Use when building features that need platform capabilities — camera, file access, notifications, UI controls, AI/ML, sensors, networking, etc. Discovers the right API for a task and retrieves full type details (methods, properties, events, enumeration values).
resemble-detect
Deepfake detection and media safety — detect AI-generated audio, images, video, and text, trace synthesis sources, apply watermarks, verify speaker identity, and analyze media intelligence using Resemble AI
quality-playbook
Run a complete quality engineering audit on any codebase. Derives behavioral requirements from the code, generates spec-traced functional tests, runs a three-pass code review with regression tests, executes a multi-model spec audit (Council of Three), and produces a consolidated bug report with TDD-verified patches. Finds the 35% of real defects that structural code review alone cannot catch. Works with any language. Trigger on 'quality playbook', 'spec audit', 'Council of Three', 'fitness-to-purpose', or 'coverage theater'.