building-vulnerability-dashboard-with-defectdojo
Deploy DefectDojo as a centralized vulnerability management dashboard that ingests findings from 200+ security scanners, deduplicates results, tracks remediation metrics, and integrates with CI/CD, Jira ticketing, and Slack notifications via its REST API. Use when consolidating scanner output into one dashboard or automating vulnerability ticketing and executive reporting.
- License 许可
- Apache-2.0
- 最近更新
- 2026-08-31
- Stars
- ★ 3.6w
- Forks
- 4.4k
01 前言 Front Matter
- name
- building-vulnerability-dashboard-with-defectdojo
- tags
- [ "defectdojo", "vulnerability-management", "dashboard", "deduplication", "scanner-integration", "devsecops", "jira" ]
- author
- mahipal
- domain
- cybersecurity
- license
- Apache-2.0
- version
- 1.0
- nist_csf
- [ "ID.RA-01", "ID.RA-02", "ID.IM-02", "ID.RA-06" ]
- subdomain
- vulnerability-management
- description
- Deploy DefectDojo as a centralized vulnerability management dashboard that ingests findings from 200+ security scanners, deduplicates results, tracks remediation metrics, and integrates with CI/CD, Jira ticketing, and Slack notifications via its REST API. Use when consolidating scanner output into one dashboard or automating vulnerability ticketing and executive reporting.
- mitre_attack
- [ "T1190", "T1203", "T1068" ]
02 资源文件 8
- 资产文件assets/template.md1.8 KB
- 许可证LICENSE11.0 KB
- 参考文档references/api-reference.md2.0 KB
- 参考文档references/standards.md1.4 KB
- 参考文档references/workflows.md1.7 KB
- 脚本scripts/agent.py6.7 KB
- 脚本scripts/process.py7.3 KB
- 其他SKILL.md.tmpl47.5 KB
03 SKILL.md 正文
Building Vulnerability Dashboard with DefectDojo
Overview
DefectDojo is an open-source application vulnerability management platform that aggregates findings from 200+ security tools, deduplicates results, tracks remediation progress, and provides executive dashboards. It serves as a central hub for vulnerability management, integrating with CI/CD pipelines, Jira for ticketing, and Slack for notifications. DefectDojo supports OWASP-based categorization and provides REST API for automation.
When to Use
- When deploying or configuring building vulnerability dashboard with defectdojo capabilities in your environment
- When establishing security controls aligned to compliance requirements
- When building or improving security architecture for this domain
- When conducting security assessments that require this implementation
Prerequisites
- Docker and Docker Compose
- 4GB+ RAM, 2+ CPU cores, 20GB+ disk
- PostgreSQL 12+ (included in Docker deployment)
- Python 3.9+ for API integration scripts
- Jira instance (optional, for ticket integration)
Deployment
Docker Compose Deployment
# Clone DefectDojo repository
git clone https://github.com/DefectDojo/django-DefectDojo.git
cd django-DefectDojo
# Start with Docker Compose (production mode)
./dc-up-d.sh
# Alternative: manual Docker Compose
docker compose up -d
# Check service status
docker compose ps
# View initial admin credentials
docker compose logs initializer 2>&1 | grep "Admin password"
# Access DefectDojo at http://localhost:8080
Environment Configuration
# Key environment variables in docker-compose.yml
DD_DATABASE_ENGINE=django.db.backends.postgresql
DD_DATABASE_HOST=postgres
DD_DATABASE_PORT=5432
DD_DATABASE_NAME=defectdojo
DD_DATABASE_USER=defectdojo
DD_DATABASE_PASSWORD=<secure_password>
DD_ALLOWED_HOSTS=*
DD_SECRET_KEY=<random_64_char_key>
DD_CREDENTIAL_AES_256_KEY=<random_128_bit_key>
DD_SOCIAL_AUTH_GOOGLE_OAUTH2_ENABLED=True
Organizational Structure
Hierarchy
Product Type (Business Unit)
└── Product (Application/Service)
└── Engagement (Assessment/Sprint)
└── Test (Scanner Run)
└── Finding (Individual Vulnerability)
Setup via API
import requests
DD_URL = "http://localhost:8080/api/v2"
API_KEY = "your_api_key_here"
HEADERS = {"Authorization": f"Token {API_KEY}", "Content-Type": "application/json"}
# Create Product Type
resp = requests.post(f"{DD_URL}/product_types/", headers=HEADERS, json={
"name": "Web Applications",
"description": "Customer-facing web application portfolio"
})
product_type_id = resp.json()["id"]
# Create Product
resp = requests.post(f"{DD_URL}/products/", headers=HEADERS, json={
"name": "Customer Portal",
"description": "Main customer-facing web application",
"prod_type": product_type_id,
"sla_configuration": 1,
})
product_id = resp.json()["id"]
# Create Engagement
resp = requests.post(f"{DD_URL}/engagements/", headers=HEADERS, json={
"name": "Q1 2024 Security Assessment",
"product": product_id,
"target_start": "2024-01-01",
"target_end": "2024-03-31",
"engagement_type": "CI/CD",
"status": "In Progress",
})
engagement_id = resp.json()["id"]
Scanner Integration
Import Scan Results via API
# Upload Nessus scan results
curl -X POST "${DD_URL}/reimport-scan/" \
-H "Authorization: Token ${API_KEY}" \
-F "scan_type=Nessus Scan" \
-F "file=@nessus_report.csv" \
-F "product_name=Customer Portal" \
-F "engagement_name=Q1 2024 Security Assessment" \
-F "auto_create_context=true" \
-F "deduplication_on_engagement=true"
# Upload OWASP ZAP results
curl -X POST "${DD_URL}/reimport-scan/" \
-H "Authorization: Token ${API_KEY}" \
-F "scan_type=ZAP Scan" \
-F "file=@zap_report.xml" \
-F "product_name=Customer Portal" \
-F "engagement_name=Q1 2024 Security Assessment" \
-F "auto_create_context=true"
# Upload Trivy container scan
curl -X POST "${DD_URL}/reimport-scan/" \
-H "Authorization: Token ${API_KEY}" \
-F "scan_type=Trivy Scan" \
-F "file=@trivy_results.json" \
-F "product_name=Customer Portal" \
-F "engagement_name=Q1 2024 Security Assessment" \
-F "auto_create_context=true"
Supported Scanner Types (Partial List)
| Scanner | Type String | Format |
|---|---|---|
| Nessus | Nessus Scan | CSV/XML |
| OpenVAS | OpenVAS CSV | CSV |
| Qualys | Qualys Scan | XML |
| OWASP ZAP | ZAP Scan | XML/JSON |
| Burp Suite | Burp XML | XML |
| Trivy | Trivy Scan | JSON |
| Semgrep | Semgrep JSON Report | JSON |
| Snyk | Snyk Scan | JSON |
| SonarQube | SonarQube Scan | JSON |
| Checkov | Checkov Scan | JSON |
CI/CD Integration (GitHub Actions)
# .github/workflows/security-scan.yml
name: Security Scan
on: [push]
jobs:
scan:
runs-on: ubuntu-latest
steps:
- uses: actions/checkout@v4
- name: Run Semgrep
run: |
pip install semgrep
semgrep --config auto --json -o semgrep_results.json .
- name: Upload to DefectDojo
run: |
curl -X POST "${{ secrets.DD_URL }}/api/v2/reimport-scan/" \
-H "Authorization: Token ${{ secrets.DD_API_KEY }}" \
-F "scan_type=Semgrep JSON Report" \
-F "file=@semgrep_results.json" \
-F "product_name=${{ github.event.repository.name }}" \
-F "engagement_name=CI/CD" \
-F "auto_create_context=true"
Jira Integration
# Configure Jira integration in DefectDojo settings
jira_config = {
"url": "https://company.atlassian.net",
"username": "jira-bot@company.com",
"password": "jira_api_token",
"default_issue_type": "Bug",
"critical_mapping_severity": "Blocker",
"high_mapping_severity": "Critical",
"medium_mapping_severity": "Major",
"low_mapping_severity": "Minor",
"finding_text": "**Vulnerability**: {{ finding.title }}\n**Severity**: {{ finding.severity }}\n**CVE**: {{ finding.cve }}\n**Description**: {{ finding.description }}",
"accepted_mapping_resolution": "Done",
"close_status_key": 6,
}
Metrics and Dashboards
Key Metrics API Queries
# Get finding counts by severity
resp = requests.get(f"{DD_URL}/findings/?limit=0&active=true",
headers=HEADERS)
findings = resp.json()
# Get SLA breach counts
resp = requests.get(f"{DD_URL}/findings/?limit=0&active=true&sla_breached=true",
headers=HEADERS)
# Get product-level metrics
resp = requests.get(f"{DD_URL}/products/{product_id}/",
headers=HEADERS)
product_data = resp.json()
References
04 同仓库更多 Skills
verifying-build-provenance-with-slsa-sigstore
Verifies artifact signatures and SLSA provenance using Sigstore's cosign (verify, verify-attestation, verify-blob-attestation) and slsa-verifier (verify-artifact), enforcing keyless OIDC builder identity and source repo against SLSA Build levels. Use in CI/CD before deploying artifacts, when consuming third-party attestations, establishing a SLSA Build L3 pipeline, or confirming provenance during incident response or admission control.
validating-tpm-measured-boot-attestation
Verifies TPM 2.0 measured-boot integrity and remote attestation with tpm2-tools -- reading PCRs (tpm2_pcrread), replaying the boot event log, generating and checking signed quotes (tpm2_quote/tpm2_checkquote), and sealing secrets to a PCR policy. Use to confirm a system booted trusted firmware/kernel for Zero Trust device posture, detect boot-chain tampering via PCR drift, or build a golden-value baseline for fleet attestation.
validating-backup-integrity-for-recovery
Validates backup integrity through cryptographic hash verification, automated restore testing, corruption detection, and recoverability checks to confirm backups are reliable for disaster recovery and ransomware response. Use before relying on backups for recovery, when building post-backup validation pipelines, auditing backup infrastructure for compliance, or checking immutable/air-gapped backups for silent corruption or tampering.
triaging-windows-with-kape
Runs KAPE (Kroll Artifact Parser and Extractor) to collect targeted forensic artifacts (registry hives, $MFT, event logs, prefetch, browser data) via Targets and parse them with Modules wrapping Eric Zimmerman's EZ Tools (PECmd, MFTECmd, RECmd). Use during early incident containment/triage when full disk imaging is impractical but a defensible, parseable Windows artifact set is needed quickly, including at-scale remote collection.
triaging-vulnerabilities-with-ssvc-framework
Triages and prioritizes vulnerabilities with CISA's Stakeholder-Specific Vulnerability Categorization (SSVC) decision tree, weighing exploitation status (via the CISA KEV catalog and FIRST EPSS API), technical impact, automatability, and mission prevalence to output Track/Track*/Attend/Act decisions. Use when prioritizing vulnerability scan results (OpenVAS, Nessus, Qualys) for remediation planning beyond raw CVSS scores.
triaging-security-incident
Performs initial triage of security incidents using the NIST SP 800-61r3 and SANS PICERL frameworks, classifying incident type, assigning priority by business impact, and routing to the appropriate response team. Use when a SIEM/EDR alert needs human classification, concurrent alerts must be prioritized, or a user report or threat-intel IOC match requires initial incident categorization.