AGENT SKILL

pinecone-rag

Build production RAG pipelines and persistent agent memory using Pinecone as the vector database backend. ALWAYS USE THIS SKILL when the user mentions Pinecone, wants to index documents for semantic search, build a retrieval-augmented generation system, store agent memory across sessions, implement hybrid search, or connect an LLM to a searchable knowledge base — even if they don't say "Pinecone" explicitly. Also use when the user asks about vector databases for RAG, namespace isolation for multi-tenant agents, embedding pipelines, or scaling a knowledge base beyond what local storage can handle. DO NOT use for local-only vector stores (Chroma, FAISS, pgvector) or pure keyword search with no semantic component.

License 许可
Apache-2.0
最近更新
2026-11-11
Stars
★ 4.1w
Forks
5.3k

01 前言 Front Matter

name
pinecone-rag
license
Apache-2.0
description
Build production RAG pipelines and persistent agent memory using Pinecone as the vector database backend. ALWAYS USE THIS SKILL when the user mentions Pinecone, wants to index documents for semantic search, build a retrieval-augmented generation system, store agent memory across sessions, implement hybrid search, or connect an LLM to a searchable knowledge base — even if they don't say "Pinecone" explicitly. Also use when the user asks about vector databases for RAG, namespace isolation for multi-tenant agents, embedding pipelines, or scaling a knowledge base beyond what local storage can handle. DO NOT use for local-only vector stores (Chroma, FAISS, pgvector) or pure keyword search with no semantic component.
compatibility
pinecone>=6.0.0, Python 3.10+

02 资源文件 3

03 SKILL.md 正文

Pinecone RAG Skill

This skill guides you through building a production RAG pipeline or persistent agent memory system using Pinecone. Follow the workflow from start to finish — don't skip steps or jump to code before understanding what the user actually needs.

Before you start — ask one question

Before writing any code, identify which of these two use cases applies:

A — RAG over documents: User wants to index a corpus (PDFs, docs, code, web pages) and retrieve relevant chunks to ground LLM responses.

B — Agent memory: User wants an agent to remember facts, decisions, or context across sessions or across multiple agents sharing a knowledge base.

The setup is similar but the namespace strategy and retrieval patterns differ. If the user hasn't said, ask: "Is this for document retrieval, agent memory, or both?" Then follow the relevant workflow below.


Step 1 — Choose your index configuration

Pick the index type before writing any code. Getting this wrong means re-creating the index later.

Serverless (recommended for most cases)

from pinecone import Pinecone, ServerlessSpec

pc = Pinecone(api_key="PINECONE_API_KEY")

if "my-index" not in pc.list_indexes().names():
    pc.create_index(
        name="my-index",
        dimension=1536,        # must match your embedding model exactly
        metric="cosine",
        spec=ServerlessSpec(cloud="aws", region="us-east-1")
    )
index = pc.Index("my-index")

Pod-based (for consistent high-throughput production)

from pinecone import PodSpec

pc.create_index(
    name="my-index-prod",
    dimension=1536,
    metric="cosine",
    spec=PodSpec(environment="us-east1-gcp", pod_type="p1.x1")
)

Dimension quick reference — match this exactly to your embedding model:

Model Dimension
text-embedding-3-small 1536
text-embedding-3-large 3072
voyage-3 / voyage-multimodal-3 1024
BAAI/bge-large-en-v1.5 1024
intfloat/multilingual-e5-large (Arabic, Malay, Chinese) 1024

Checkpoint: Index exists, dimension matches embedding model, index.describe_index_stats() returns without error.


Step 2 — Embed and upsert documents

Always batch upserts — never upsert one vector at a time.

from openai import OpenAI

client = OpenAI()

def embed(texts: list[str]) -> list[list[float]]:
    res = client.embeddings.create(model="text-embedding-3-small", input=texts)
    return [r.embedding for r in res.data]

def upsert_docs(index, docs: list[dict], namespace: str = "default"):
    """docs = [{"id": "...", "text": "...", "metadata": {...}}]"""
    BATCH = 100
    for i in range(0, len(docs), BATCH):
        batch = docs[i:i + BATCH]
        vecs = [
            {
                "id": d["id"],
                "values": emb,
                "metadata": {**d.get("metadata", {}), "text": d["text"]}
            }
            for d, emb in zip(batch, embed([d["text"] for d in batch]))
        ]
        index.upsert(vectors=vecs, namespace=namespace)

Always store the original text in metadata — this avoids a second lookup at retrieval time.

Checkpoint: index.describe_index_stats() shows vector count > 0 in the target namespace.


Step 3 — Choose retrieval strategy

Dense (semantic) search — use for most cases

def search(index, query: str, top_k: int = 5, namespace: str = "default",
           filter: dict = None) -> list[dict]:
    [q_emb] = embed([query])
    results = index.query(
        vector=q_emb, top_k=top_k, namespace=namespace,
        include_metadata=True, filter=filter
    )
    return [{"text": m.metadata["text"], "score": m.score, "id": m.id}
            for m in results.matches]

Hybrid search (semantic + BM25 keyword) — use when corpus has exact terminology

Use hybrid when the domain has precise terms that semantic search misses: legal citations, medical codes, product SKUs, API method names.

from pinecone_text.sparse import BM25Encoder

bm25 = BM25Encoder().default()
bm25.fit([d["text"] for d in docs])  # fit once on your corpus

def hybrid_search(index, query: str, top_k: int = 5, alpha: float = 0.7):
    """alpha=1.0 is pure dense; alpha=0.0 is pure sparse."""
    dense = [v * alpha for v in embed([query])[0]]
    sparse_raw = bm25.encode_queries(query)
    sparse = {
        "indices": sparse_raw["indices"],
        "values": [v * (1 - alpha) for v in sparse_raw["values"]]
    }
    return index.query(vector=dense, sparse_vector=sparse,
                       top_k=top_k, include_metadata=True).matches

Metadata filtering — use to scope results before semantic ranking

# Exact match
results = index.query(vector=emb, filter={"source": {"$eq": "confluence"}})

# Combined filter
results = index.query(vector=emb, filter={
    "$and": [
        {"category": {"$eq": "engineering"}},
        {"language": {"$in": ["en", "ar"]}}
    ]
})

Checkpoint: A test query returns relevant results with scores > 0.7 for clearly matching content.


Step 4A — Full RAG pipeline (document use case)

def rag_answer(index, question: str, namespace: str = "default",
               model: str = "gpt-4o-mini") -> str:
    hits = search(index, question, top_k=5, namespace=namespace)
    context = "\n\n".join(h["text"] for h in hits)

    return client.chat.completions.create(
        model=model,
        messages=[
            {
                "role": "system",
                "content": (
                    "Answer using only the provided context. "
                    "If the answer isn't in the context, say so.\n\n"
                    f"Context:\n{context}"
                )
            },
            {"role": "user", "content": question}
        ]
    ).choices[0].message.content

Step 4B — Agent memory (memory use case)

Use namespaces to isolate each agent's or user's memories completely. Namespace per agent prevents memory bleed across users or sessions.

import time, hashlib

def remember(index, agent_id: str, content: str,
             memory_type: str = "fact"):
    """Store a memory for an agent."""
    mem_id = hashlib.md5(
        f"{agent_id}{content}{time.time()}".encode()
    ).hexdigest()
    [emb] = embed([content])
    index.upsert(
        vectors=[{
            "id": mem_id,
            "values": emb,
            "metadata": {
                "text": content,
                "type": memory_type,
                "timestamp": time.time(),
                "agent_id": agent_id
            }
        }],
        namespace=f"agent_{agent_id}"
    )

def recall(index, agent_id: str, query: str,
           top_k: int = 5) -> list[str]:
    """Recall relevant memories for an agent."""
    return [h["text"] for h in
            search(index, query, top_k=top_k,
                   namespace=f"agent_{agent_id}")]

def forget(index, agent_id: str):
    """Wipe all memories for an agent (e.g., on user request)."""
    index.delete(delete_all=True, namespace=f"agent_{agent_id}")

Step 5 — Wire it together and test end to end

Run a quick smoke test before integrating into the larger system:

# Smoke test
upsert_docs(index, [
    {"id": "t1", "text": "Pinecone is a vector database for semantic search."},
    {"id": "t2", "text": "RAG combines retrieval with language model generation."},
])

hits = search(index, "What is Pinecone?")
assert hits[0]["score"] > 0.7, f"Expected high similarity, got {hits[0]['score']}"
print("Smoke test passed:", hits[0]["text"])

Checkpoint: Smoke test passes. End-to-end: index → upsert → query → LLM response works without errors.


Common pitfalls — fix these before they become bugs

  • Dimension mismatch: always verify len(embed(["test"])[0]) matches the index dimension before your first upsert.
  • Missing text in metadata: if you don't store "text" in metadata, you'll need a second lookup to get the actual content at query time.
  • Single-vector upserts in a loop: always batch in chunks of 100.
  • No namespace strategy: decide upfront — one namespace per user/agent prevents cross-tenant data leaks that are hard to fix later.
  • Fitting BM25 on a small corpus: BM25 needs a representative corpus to build good term frequencies. Fit on at least a few hundred documents.

When NOT to use this skill

Use a different approach when:

  • The dataset fits in memory and latency doesn't matter → use FAISS or Chroma
  • You're already on PostgreSQL and want to avoid a new service → use pgvector
  • You need sub-5ms p99 latency with no external API calls → local vector store
  • The user explicitly wants a different vector DB (Weaviate, Qdrant, etc.)

04 同仓库更多 Skills

github
github/awesome-copilot

supabase-rls-policies

Write, review, and test Supabase Row Level Security (RLS) policies so that one user cannot read or change another user's rows. Use when creating or changing tables, policies, views, or security definer functions in a Supabase project, when reviewing a migration that touches RLS, or when asked to prove user isolation with pgTAP tests that sign in as two users.

测试与质量Skill与智能体开发
★ 4.1w
github
github/awesome-copilot

skill-distribution-audit

Audit a skill collection before release or investigate installer omissions, archived/template leakage, duplicate identities, and manifest drift. Reconcile the intended public source set, distribution manifest, and actual discovery output for a specified consumer version. Includes a deterministic set-comparison helper.

Skill与智能体开发
★ 4.1w
github
github/awesome-copilot

logicapps-custom-code-net10-migration

Migrate Azure Logic Apps Standard local-function custom-code projects from .NET 8 to .NET 10. Use for legacy Logic Apps custom-code workspace upgrades, project/package configuration, custom-worker settings, publication, and integrated VS Code debugging. Not for ordinary .NET applications, standalone Azure Functions, Consumption workflows, or cloud deployment.

开发工程师
★ 4.1w
github
github/awesome-copilot

winmd-api-search

Find and explore Windows desktop APIs. Use when building features that need platform capabilities — camera, file access, notifications, UI controls, AI/ML, sensors, networking, etc. Discovers the right API for a task and retrieves full type details (methods, properties, events, enumeration values).

开发工程师后端与接口
★ 4.1w
github
github/awesome-copilot

resemble-detect

Deepfake detection and media safety — detect AI-generated audio, images, video, and text, trace synthesis sources, apply watermarks, verify speaker identity, and analyze media intelligence using Resemble AI

后端与接口图像与多媒体
★ 4.1w
github
github/awesome-copilot

quality-playbook

Run a complete quality engineering audit on any codebase. Derives behavioral requirements from the code, generates spec-traced functional tests, runs a three-pass code review with regression tests, executes a multi-model spec audit (Council of Three), and produces a consolidated bug report with TDD-verified patches. Finds the 35% of real defects that structural code review alone cannot catch. Works with any language. Trigger on 'quality playbook', 'spec audit', 'Council of Three', 'fitness-to-purpose', or 'coverage theater'.

代码审查Skill与智能体开发
★ 4.1w