prompt-engineering-patterns
Master advanced prompt engineering techniques to maximize LLM performance, reliability, and controllability.
- License 许可
- MIT
- 最近更新
- 2026-11-14
- Stars
- ★ 3.3w
- Forks
- 3.9k
01 前言 Front Matter
- name
- prompt-engineering-patterns
- metadata
- { "risk": "unknown", "source": "community", "date_added": "2026-02-27" }
- description
- Master advanced prompt engineering techniques to maximize LLM performance, reliability, and controllability.
02 资源文件 8
- 资产文件assets/few-shot-examples.json4.1 KB
- 资产文件assets/prompt-template-library.md3.2 KB
- 参考文档references/chain-of-thought.md9.2 KB
- 参考文档references/few-shot-learning.md10.9 KB
- 参考文档references/prompt-optimization.md12.5 KB
- 参考文档references/prompt-templates.md11.1 KB
- 参考文档references/system-prompts.md5.3 KB
- 脚本scripts/optimize-prompt.py8.9 KB
03 SKILL.md 正文
Prompt Engineering Patterns
Master advanced prompt engineering techniques to maximize LLM performance, reliability, and controllability.
Do not use this skill when
- The task is unrelated to prompt engineering patterns
- You need a different domain or tool outside this scope
Instructions
- Clarify goals, constraints, and required inputs.
- Apply relevant best practices and validate outcomes.
- Provide actionable steps and verification.
- If detailed examples are required, open
resources/implementation-playbook.md.
Use this skill when
- Designing complex prompts for production LLM applications
- Optimizing prompt performance and consistency
- Implementing structured reasoning patterns (chain-of-thought, tree-of-thought)
- Building few-shot learning systems with dynamic example selection
- Creating reusable prompt templates with variable interpolation
- Debugging and refining prompts that produce inconsistent outputs
- Implementing system prompts for specialized AI assistants
Core Capabilities
1. Few-Shot Learning
- Example selection strategies (semantic similarity, diversity sampling)
- Balancing example count with context window constraints
- Constructing effective demonstrations with input-output pairs
- Dynamic example retrieval from knowledge bases
- Handling edge cases through strategic example selection
2. Chain-of-Thought Prompting
- Step-by-step reasoning elicitation
- Zero-shot CoT with "Let's think step by step"
- Few-shot CoT with reasoning traces
- Self-consistency techniques (sampling multiple reasoning paths)
- Verification and validation steps
3. Prompt Optimization
- Iterative refinement workflows
- A/B testing prompt variations
- Measuring prompt performance metrics (accuracy, consistency, latency)
- Reducing token usage while maintaining quality
- Handling edge cases and failure modes
4. Template Systems
- Variable interpolation and formatting
- Conditional prompt sections
- Multi-turn conversation templates
- Role-based prompt composition
- Modular prompt components
5. System Prompt Design
- Setting model behavior and constraints
- Defining output formats and structure
- Establishing role and expertise
- Safety guidelines and content policies
- Context setting and background information
Quick Start
from prompt_optimizer import PromptTemplate, FewShotSelector
# Define a structured prompt template
template = PromptTemplate(
system="You are an expert SQL developer. Generate efficient, secure SQL queries.",
instruction="Convert the following natural language query to SQL:\n{query}",
few_shot_examples=True,
output_format="SQL code block with explanatory comments"
)
# Configure few-shot learning
selector = FewShotSelector(
examples_db="sql_examples.jsonl",
selection_strategy="semantic_similarity",
max_examples=3
)
# Generate optimized prompt
prompt = template.render(
query="Find all users who registered in the last 30 days",
examples=selector.select(query="user registration date filter")
)
Key Patterns
Progressive Disclosure
Start with simple prompts, add complexity only when needed:
-
Level 1: Direct instruction
- "Summarize this article"
-
Level 2: Add constraints
- "Summarize this article in 3 bullet points, focusing on key findings"
-
Level 3: Add reasoning
- "Read this article, identify the main findings, then summarize in 3 bullet points"
-
Level 4: Add examples
- Include 2-3 example summaries with input-output pairs
Instruction Hierarchy
[System Context] → [Task Instruction] → [Examples] → [Input Data] → [Output Format]
Error Recovery
Build prompts that gracefully handle failures:
- Include fallback instructions
- Request confidence scores
- Ask for alternative interpretations when uncertain
- Specify how to indicate missing information
Best Practices
- Be Specific: Vague prompts produce inconsistent results
- Show, Don't Tell: Examples are more effective than descriptions
- Test Extensively: Evaluate on diverse, representative inputs
- Iterate Rapidly: Small changes can have large impacts
- Monitor Performance: Track metrics in production
- Version Control: Treat prompts as code with proper versioning
- Document Intent: Explain why prompts are structured as they are
Common Pitfalls
- Over-engineering: Starting with complex prompts before trying simple ones
- Example pollution: Using examples that don't match the target task
- Context overflow: Exceeding token limits with excessive examples
- Ambiguous instructions: Leaving room for multiple interpretations
- Ignoring edge cases: Not testing on unusual or boundary inputs
Integration Patterns
With RAG Systems
# Combine retrieved context with prompt engineering
prompt = f"""Given the following context:
{retrieved_context}
{few_shot_examples}
Question: {user_question}
Provide a detailed answer based solely on the context above. If the context doesn't contain enough information, explicitly state what's missing."""
With Validation
# Add self-verification step
prompt = f"""{main_task_prompt}
After generating your response, verify it meets these criteria:
1. Answers the question directly
2. Uses only information from provided context
3. Cites specific sources
4. Acknowledges any uncertainty
If verification fails, revise your response."""
Performance Optimization
Token Efficiency
- Remove redundant words and phrases
- Use abbreviations consistently after first definition
- Consolidate similar instructions
- Move stable content to system prompts
Latency Reduction
- Minimize prompt length without sacrificing quality
- Use streaming for long-form outputs
- Cache common prompt prefixes
- Batch similar requests when possible
Resources
- references/few-shot-learning.md: Deep dive on example selection and construction
- references/chain-of-thought.md: Advanced reasoning elicitation techniques
- references/prompt-optimization.md: Systematic refinement workflows
- references/prompt-templates.md: Reusable template patterns
- references/system-prompts.md: System-level prompt design
- assets/prompt-template-library.md: Battle-tested prompt templates
- assets/few-shot-examples.json: Curated example datasets
- scripts/optimize-prompt.py: Automated prompt optimization tool
Success Metrics
Track these KPIs for your prompts:
- Accuracy: Correctness of outputs
- Consistency: Reproducibility across similar inputs
- Latency: Response time (P50, P95, P99)
- Token Usage: Average tokens per request
- Success Rate: Percentage of valid outputs
- User Satisfaction: Ratings and feedback
Next Steps
- Review the prompt template library for common patterns
- Experiment with few-shot learning for your specific use case
- Implement prompt versioning and A/B testing
- Set up automated evaluation pipelines
- Document your prompt engineering decisions and learnings
04 同仓库更多 Skills
wealthville-pool-scoring
Score DeFi liquidity pools before providing liquidity. Returns a 0-100 pool score and an Enter/Hold/Exit/Reduce/Avoid verdict with calibrated confidence for ~68,800 Solana pools and 575 EVM pools, plus a public miss-inclusive track record. Use when asked whether a pool is worth LPing into, which pools look best right now, or how accurate the scores have actually been.
technical-debt-auditor
Scans a codebase and produces a quantified technical debt report with a prioritized remediation plan. Analyzes dead code, TODO/FIXME/HACK markers, dependency staleness, complexity hotspots, code duplication signals, test coverage gaps, unused exports, and outdated patterns. Use this skill when the user asks to audit their codebase for tech debt, wants a health check of their code quality, says things like "where should I focus refactoring", "find code smells", "audit my codebase", "what technical debt do we have", "prioritize cleanup work", or asks about code quality metrics. Also trigger when the user mentions "code rot", "legacy cleanup", "refactoring priorities", or wants to understand the overall health of a project before a major effort. Trigger even if the user doesn't say "technical debt" explicitly — any request to systematically assess code quality and identify improvement priorities belongs here.
readonly-sql-guard
Make an agent's database access provably read-only. Use when an agent runs caller-supplied SQL against a production/ERP/analytics database (a "query" MCP tool, text-to-SQL, an admin console), or when reviewing DB-access code for write/DDL/side-effect/transaction-escape risks. Checks what a statement CALLS, not just its shape.
web-artifacts-builder
Suite of tools for creating elaborate, multi-component claude.ai HTML artifacts using modern frontend web technologies (React, Tailwind CSS, shadcn/ui). Use for complex artifacts requiring state management, routing, or shadcn/ui components - not for simple single-file HTML/JSX artifacts.
webapp-testing
Toolkit for interacting with and testing local web applications using Playwright. Supports verifying frontend functionality, debugging UI behavior, capturing browser screenshots, and viewing browser logs.
discernment-nudge
After you give a substantive answer or draft that the user may act on — advice or recommendations, drafted artifacts such as goals, plans, pitches, proposals, or emails, estimates or projections, analysis or interpretation of data, factual claims they may rely on, or a multi-step argument — invoke this skill BEFORE finalizing your reply and then, if it applies, append 2-3 short follow-up questions, each tied to something specific in what you just produced, that help the user check key facts, probe the reasoning or assumptions, and notice missing context. Do this at most once per conversation. Skip it when the user asked a trivial how-to or simple lookup, wants a purely educational explanation, asked you only to format, convert, or assemble a file from content they provided, is writing code they will run, is doing creative writing or casual chat, or already asked you to double-check, cite, or review — the skill file explains these boundaries and the exact output format.