benchmarking-kubernetes-with-kube-bench
Installs and runs the kube-bench tool against a Kubernetes cluster as a Job, DaemonSet, or standalone binary, selecting the correct benchmark version and targets (control plane, etcd, kubelet, worker nodes) and emitting JSON or JUnit output for pipelines. Use when setting kube-bench up for the first time, choosing which benchmark version and node targets to run, wiring it into CI, or troubleshooting skipped or misdetected checks. Keywords: kube-bench, DaemonSet, --benchmark, --targets, JSON output, JUnit, CI integration. Do not use for interpreting the findings or producing an audit report - use performing-kubernetes-cis-benchmark-with-kube-bench.
- License 许可
- Apache-2.0
- 最近更新
- 2026-08-31
- Stars
- ★ 3.6w
- Forks
- 4.4k
01 前言 Front Matter
- name
- benchmarking-kubernetes-with-kube-bench
- tags
- [ "kubernetes", "kube-bench", "cis-benchmark", "container-security", "hardening", "compliance", "cluster-security" ]
- author
- mahipal
- domain
- cybersecurity
- license
- Apache-2.0
- version
- 1.0
- nist_csf
- [ "PR.PS-01" ]
- subdomain
- container-security
- description
- Installs and runs the kube-bench tool against a Kubernetes cluster as a Job, DaemonSet, or standalone binary, selecting the correct benchmark version and targets (control plane, etcd, kubelet, worker nodes) and emitting JSON or JUnit output for pipelines. Use when setting kube-bench up for the first time, choosing which benchmark version and node targets to run, wiring it into CI, or troubleshooting skipped or misdetected checks. Keywords: kube-bench, DaemonSet, --benchmark, --targets, JSON output, JUnit, CI integration. Do not use for interpreting the findings or producing an audit report - use performing-kubernetes-cis-benchmark-with-kube-bench.
- mitre_attack
- [ "T1610" ]
02 资源文件 4
- 许可证LICENSE11.0 KB
- 参考文档references/api-reference.md2.9 KB
- 参考文档references/standards.md1.6 KB
- 脚本scripts/agent.py5.6 KB
03 SKILL.md 正文
Benchmarking Kubernetes with kube-bench
Overview
kube-bench (by Aqua Security) is an open-source tool that checks whether a Kubernetes cluster is deployed securely by running the checks documented in the CIS Kubernetes Benchmark. It inspects the control-plane components (API server, controller manager, scheduler, etcd), the kubelet and worker-node configuration, and cluster-wide policy settings, then reports each check as PASS, FAIL, WARN, or INFO with a remediation recommendation drawn directly from the CIS guidance. Tests are configuration-driven YAML files, so kube-bench tracks new Kubernetes versions and benchmark revisions and supports managed distributions (EKS, GKE, AKS, ACK, OpenShift, RKE, k3s).
Hardening a cluster against the CIS Benchmark directly reduces the attack surface for T1610 (Deploy Container), where an adversary deploys a container to execute code or evade defenses — for example by abusing privileged containers, host namespaces, anonymous API access, or insecure kubelet settings that an unhardened cluster leaves exposed.
kube-bench can run as a standalone binary on a node, inside a container, or — most commonly — as a Kubernetes Job whose pod has the host filesystem mounted so it can read the relevant config files. Output is available as human-readable text, JSON, JUnit, or AWS Security Finding Format (ASFF) and can be pushed to a PostgreSQL database for trend tracking.
When to Use
- When establishing a security baseline for a new Kubernetes cluster against the CIS Kubernetes Benchmark.
- When performing periodic compliance audits of control-plane and node hardening.
- When validating remediation after applying hardening changes (re-run to confirm checks now PASS).
- When integrating cluster compliance scanning into CI/CD or a continuous monitoring pipeline.
- When preparing evidence for SOC 2, PCI DSS, or internal hardening compliance.
Prerequisites
- Access to the cluster: either SSH access to a control-plane/worker node (binary mode) or
kubectlwith permission to create Jobs (in-cluster mode). - Knowledge of the cluster's Kubernetes version (kube-bench auto-detects, or specify with
--version/--benchmark). - Install kube-bench (Aqua Security official methods):
# Binary release (Linux)
KB_VERSION=0.10.7
curl -L -o kube-bench.tgz \
"https://github.com/aquasecurity/kube-bench/releases/download/v${KB_VERSION}/kube-bench_${KB_VERSION}_linux_amd64.tar.gz"
tar -xzf kube-bench.tgz
sudo mv kube-bench /usr/local/bin/
sudo cp -R cfg /etc/kube-bench/cfg
# Via Go install
go install github.com/aquasecurity/kube-bench@latest
# Run as a one-off container directly on a node (mounts host config)
docker run --rm --pid=host \
-v /etc:/etc:ro -v /var:/var:ro \
-t docker.io/aquasec/kube-bench:latest run --targets node
# Verify
kube-bench version
Objectives
- Run kube-bench against the appropriate benchmark for the cluster's Kubernetes version.
- Scan control-plane (master), node, etcd, control-plane policies, and managed-service targets.
- Produce machine-readable JSON/JUnit output for pipelines and dashboards.
- Triage FAIL and WARN results and apply CIS remediation guidance.
- Re-run to validate that remediations now PASS.
MITRE ATT&CK Mapping
| Technique ID | Name | Tactic | Relevance |
|---|---|---|---|
| T1610 | Deploy Container | Execution / Defense Evasion | CIS Benchmark hardening enforced by kube-bench restricts privileged/host-namespace deployments, anonymous API access, and insecure kubelet settings that adversaries abuse when deploying malicious containers. |
Workflow
1. Run the default scan (auto-detect)
Run all applicable targets, letting kube-bench detect the Kubernetes version and benchmark:
sudo kube-bench
2. Run as a Kubernetes Job (in-cluster)
Apply the provided Job manifest from the kube-bench repo and read the results from the pod logs:
# General-purpose job
kubectl apply -f https://raw.githubusercontent.com/aquasecurity/kube-bench/main/job.yaml
# Wait, then retrieve results
kubectl get pods -l app=kube-bench
kubectl logs -l app=kube-bench
# Platform-specific jobs are available, e.g. EKS:
kubectl apply -f https://raw.githubusercontent.com/aquasecurity/kube-bench/main/job-eks.yaml
3. Target specific components
Use run --targets to scope the scan to particular component groups:
# Control-plane (API server, scheduler, controller manager)
sudo kube-bench run --targets master
# Worker node (kubelet, proxy)
sudo kube-bench run --targets node
# etcd datastore
sudo kube-bench run --targets etcd
# Cluster-wide policies (RBAC, pod security, network policy)
sudo kube-bench run --targets policies
# Combine multiple targets
sudo kube-bench run --targets master,node,etcd,policies
4. Pin a specific benchmark or Kubernetes version
When auto-detection is wrong or you must audit against a specific revision, pin the benchmark explicitly:
# Pin to a specific CIS benchmark revision
sudo kube-bench run --benchmark cis-1.8
# Or map by Kubernetes version
sudo kube-bench --version 1.27
# Managed/distribution-specific benchmarks
sudo kube-bench run --benchmark eks-1.5.0
sudo kube-bench run --benchmark gke-1.6.0
sudo kube-bench run --benchmark rke2-cis-1.7
5. Run or skip individual checks
Focus on or exclude specific check IDs during remediation cycles:
# Run only specific checks
sudo kube-bench run --targets master --check 1.2.1,1.2.2
# Skip noisy/known-accepted checks
sudo kube-bench run --targets node --skip 4.2.6
6. Produce machine-readable output
Emit JSON or JUnit for ingestion into pipelines, SIEM, or dashboards, and write to a file:
# JSON to a file
sudo kube-bench run --targets master,node --json --outputfile kube-bench-report.json
# JUnit (for CI test reporting)
sudo kube-bench --junit --outputfile kube-bench-junit.xml
# AWS Security Finding Format (for Security Hub)
sudo kube-bench run --targets node --asff
7. Triage and remediate FAIL/WARN findings
Each failing check prints a remediation. Apply the CIS-recommended fix on the node/manifest, for example tightening API server flags in the static pod manifest:
# Example remediation for a common control-plane FAIL:
# CIS 1.2.x — ensure anonymous-auth is disabled on the API server.
# Edit the static pod manifest and set the flag:
sudo vi /etc/kubernetes/manifests/kube-apiserver.yaml
# - --anonymous-auth=false
# The kubelet restarts the static pod automatically.
# Example node remediation — kubelet config file permissions (CIS 4.1.x):
sudo chmod 600 /etc/kubernetes/kubelet/kubelet-config.json
sudo chown root:root /etc/kubernetes/kubelet/kubelet-config.json
8. Re-validate after remediation
Re-run the relevant target and confirm the previously failing checks now PASS, then track the score over time:
sudo kube-bench run --targets master --check 1.2.1 --json --outputfile recheck.json
# Optional: persist results to PostgreSQL for trend tracking
sudo kube-bench run --targets master,node --pgsql
Tools and Resources
| Tool / Resource | Purpose | Link |
|---|---|---|
| kube-bench | CIS Kubernetes Benchmark checker | https://github.com/aquasecurity/kube-bench |
| kube-bench docs | Running / platforms / flags | https://aquasecurity.github.io/kube-bench/ |
| CIS Kubernetes Benchmark | Source hardening standard | https://www.cisecurity.org/benchmark/kubernetes |
| Trivy Operator | Continuous in-cluster compliance + vuln scanning | https://github.com/aquasecurity/trivy-operator |
| kube-hunter | Complementary penetration-testing tool | https://github.com/aquasecurity/kube-hunter |
Validation Criteria
- [ ] kube-bench installed (
kube-bench version) or running as a Job. - [ ] Scan run against the correct benchmark for the cluster's Kubernetes version.
- [ ] master, node, etcd, and policies targets each scanned.
- [ ] JSON/JUnit output produced for pipeline/dashboard ingestion.
- [ ] FAIL and WARN findings triaged and prioritized.
- [ ] CIS remediation applied to control-plane manifests and node configs.
- [ ] Re-run confirms previously failing checks now PASS.
- [ ] Results tracked over time (file archive or PostgreSQL).
04 同仓库更多 Skills
verifying-build-provenance-with-slsa-sigstore
Verifies artifact signatures and SLSA provenance using Sigstore's cosign (verify, verify-attestation, verify-blob-attestation) and slsa-verifier (verify-artifact), enforcing keyless OIDC builder identity and source repo against SLSA Build levels. Use in CI/CD before deploying artifacts, when consuming third-party attestations, establishing a SLSA Build L3 pipeline, or confirming provenance during incident response or admission control.
validating-tpm-measured-boot-attestation
Verifies TPM 2.0 measured-boot integrity and remote attestation with tpm2-tools -- reading PCRs (tpm2_pcrread), replaying the boot event log, generating and checking signed quotes (tpm2_quote/tpm2_checkquote), and sealing secrets to a PCR policy. Use to confirm a system booted trusted firmware/kernel for Zero Trust device posture, detect boot-chain tampering via PCR drift, or build a golden-value baseline for fleet attestation.
validating-backup-integrity-for-recovery
Validates backup integrity through cryptographic hash verification, automated restore testing, corruption detection, and recoverability checks to confirm backups are reliable for disaster recovery and ransomware response. Use before relying on backups for recovery, when building post-backup validation pipelines, auditing backup infrastructure for compliance, or checking immutable/air-gapped backups for silent corruption or tampering.
triaging-windows-with-kape
Runs KAPE (Kroll Artifact Parser and Extractor) to collect targeted forensic artifacts (registry hives, $MFT, event logs, prefetch, browser data) via Targets and parse them with Modules wrapping Eric Zimmerman's EZ Tools (PECmd, MFTECmd, RECmd). Use during early incident containment/triage when full disk imaging is impractical but a defensible, parseable Windows artifact set is needed quickly, including at-scale remote collection.
triaging-vulnerabilities-with-ssvc-framework
Triages and prioritizes vulnerabilities with CISA's Stakeholder-Specific Vulnerability Categorization (SSVC) decision tree, weighing exploitation status (via the CISA KEV catalog and FIRST EPSS API), technical impact, automatability, and mission prevalence to output Track/Track*/Attend/Act decisions. Use when prioritizing vulnerability scan results (OpenVAS, Nessus, Qualys) for remediation planning beyond raw CVSS scores.
triaging-security-incident
Performs initial triage of security incidents using the NIST SP 800-61r3 and SANS PICERL frameworks, classifying incident type, assigning priority by business impact, and routing to the appropriate response team. Use when a SIEM/EDR alert needs human classification, concurrent alerts must be prioritized, or a user report or threat-intel IOC match requires initial incident categorization.