post-training-simpo
Simple Preference Optimization for LLM alignment. Reference-free alternative to DPO with better performance (+6.4 points on AlpacaEval 2.0). No reference model needed, more efficient than DPO. Use for preference alignment when want simpler, faster training than DPO/PPO.
- License 许可
- MIT
- 最近更新
- 2026-11-14
- Stars
- ★ 3.3w
- Forks
- 3.9k
01 前言 Front Matter
- name
- post-training-simpo
- license
- MIT
- metadata
- { "tags": [ "Post-Training", "SimPO", "Preference Optimization", "Alignment", "DPO Alternative", "Reference-Free", "LLM Alignment", "Efficient Training" ], "author": "Orchestra Research", "version": "1.0.0", "dependencies": [ "torch", "transformers", "datasets", "trl", "accelerate" ] }
- description
- Simple Preference Optimization for LLM alignment. Reference-free alternative to DPO with better performance (+6.4 points on AlpacaEval 2.0). No reference model needed, more efficient than DPO. Use for preference alignment when want simpler, faster training than DPO/PPO.
02 资源文件 4
- 参考文档references/datasets.md10.6 KB
- 参考文档references/hyperparameters.md8.3 KB
- 参考文档references/loss-functions.md6.9 KB
- 其他SKILL.md.tmpl14.8 KB
03 SKILL.md 正文
SimPO - Simple Preference Optimization
Quick start
SimPO is a reference-free preference optimization method that outperforms DPO without needing a reference model.
Installation:
# Create environment
conda create -n simpo python=3.10 && conda activate simpo
# Install PyTorch 2.2.2
# Visit: https://pytorch.org/get-started/locally/
# Install alignment-handbook
git clone https://github.com/huggingface/alignment-handbook.git
cd alignment-handbook
python -m pip install .
# Install Flash Attention 2
python -m pip install flash-attn --no-build-isolation
Training (Mistral 7B):
ACCELERATE_LOG_LEVEL=info accelerate launch \
--config_file accelerate_configs/deepspeed_zero3.yaml \
scripts/run_simpo.py \
training_configs/mistral-7b-base-simpo.yaml
Common workflows
Workflow 1: Train from base model (Mistral 7B)
Config (mistral-7b-base-simpo.yaml):
# Model
model_name_or_path: mistralai/Mistral-7B-v0.1
torch_dtype: bfloat16
# Dataset
dataset_mixer:
HuggingFaceH4/ultrafeedback_binarized: 1.0
dataset_splits:
- train_prefs
- test_prefs
# SimPO hyperparameters
beta: 2.0 # Reward scaling (2.0-10.0)
gamma_beta_ratio: 0.5 # Target margin (0-1)
loss_type: sigmoid # sigmoid or hinge
sft_weight: 0.0 # Optional SFT regularization
# Training
learning_rate: 5e-7 # Critical: 3e-7 to 1e-6
num_train_epochs: 1
per_device_train_batch_size: 1
gradient_accumulation_steps: 8
# Output
output_dir: ./outputs/mistral-7b-simpo
Launch training:
accelerate launch --config_file accelerate_configs/deepspeed_zero3.yaml \
scripts/run_simpo.py training_configs/mistral-7b-base-simpo.yaml
Workflow 2: Fine-tune instruct model (Llama 3 8B)
Config (llama3-8b-instruct-simpo.yaml):
model_name_or_path: meta-llama/Meta-Llama-3-8B-Instruct
dataset_mixer:
argilla/ultrafeedback-binarized-preferences-cleaned: 1.0
beta: 2.5
gamma_beta_ratio: 0.5
learning_rate: 5e-7
sft_weight: 0.1 # Add SFT loss to preserve capabilities
num_train_epochs: 1
per_device_train_batch_size: 2
gradient_accumulation_steps: 4
output_dir: ./outputs/llama3-8b-simpo
Launch:
accelerate launch --config_file accelerate_configs/deepspeed_zero3.yaml \
scripts/run_simpo.py training_configs/llama3-8b-instruct-simpo.yaml
Workflow 3: Reasoning-intensive tasks (lower LR)
For math/code tasks:
model_name_or_path: deepseek-ai/deepseek-math-7b-base
dataset_mixer:
argilla/distilabel-math-preference-dpo: 1.0
beta: 5.0 # Higher for stronger signal
gamma_beta_ratio: 0.7 # Larger margin
learning_rate: 3e-7 # Lower LR for reasoning
sft_weight: 0.0
num_train_epochs: 1
per_device_train_batch_size: 1
gradient_accumulation_steps: 16
When to use vs alternatives
Use SimPO when:
- Want simpler training than DPO (no reference model)
- Have preference data (chosen/rejected pairs)
- Need better performance than DPO
- Limited compute resources
- Single-node training sufficient
Algorithm selection:
- SimPO: Simplest, best performance, no reference model
- DPO: Need reference model baseline, more conservative
- PPO: Maximum control, need reward model, complex setup
- GRPO: Memory-efficient RL, no critic
Use alternatives instead:
- OpenRLHF: Multi-node distributed training, PPO/GRPO
- TRL: Need multiple methods in one framework
- DPO: Established baseline comparison
Common issues
Issue: Loss divergence
Reduce learning rate:
learning_rate: 3e-7 # Reduce from 5e-7
Reduce beta:
beta: 1.0 # Reduce from 2.0
Issue: Model forgets capabilities
Add SFT regularization:
sft_weight: 0.1 # Add SFT loss component
Issue: Poor preference separation
Increase beta and margin:
beta: 5.0 # Increase from 2.0
gamma_beta_ratio: 0.8 # Increase from 0.5
Issue: OOM during training
Reduce batch size:
per_device_train_batch_size: 1
gradient_accumulation_steps: 16 # Maintain effective batch
Enable gradient checkpointing:
gradient_checkpointing: true
Advanced topics
Loss functions: See references/loss-functions.md for sigmoid vs hinge loss, mathematical formulations, and when to use each.
Hyperparameter tuning: See references/hyperparameters.md for beta, gamma, learning rate selection guide, and model-size-specific recommendations.
Dataset preparation: See references/datasets.md for preference data formats, quality filtering, and custom dataset creation.
Hardware requirements
- GPU: NVIDIA A100/H100 recommended
- VRAM:
- 7B model: 1× A100 40GB (DeepSpeed ZeRO-3)
- 8B model: 2× A100 40GB
- 70B model: 8× A100 80GB
- Single-node: DeepSpeed ZeRO-3 sufficient
- Mixed precision: BF16 recommended
Memory optimization:
- DeepSpeed ZeRO-3 (default config)
- Gradient checkpointing
- Flash Attention 2
Resources
- Paper: https://arxiv.org/abs/2405.14734 (NeurIPS 2024)
- GitHub: https://github.com/princeton-nlp/SimPO
- Models: https://huggingface.co/princeton-nlp
- Alignment Handbook: https://github.com/huggingface/alignment-handbook
04 同仓库更多 Skills
wealthville-pool-scoring
Score DeFi liquidity pools before providing liquidity. Returns a 0-100 pool score and an Enter/Hold/Exit/Reduce/Avoid verdict with calibrated confidence for ~68,800 Solana pools and 575 EVM pools, plus a public miss-inclusive track record. Use when asked whether a pool is worth LPing into, which pools look best right now, or how accurate the scores have actually been.
technical-debt-auditor
Scans a codebase and produces a quantified technical debt report with a prioritized remediation plan. Analyzes dead code, TODO/FIXME/HACK markers, dependency staleness, complexity hotspots, code duplication signals, test coverage gaps, unused exports, and outdated patterns. Use this skill when the user asks to audit their codebase for tech debt, wants a health check of their code quality, says things like "where should I focus refactoring", "find code smells", "audit my codebase", "what technical debt do we have", "prioritize cleanup work", or asks about code quality metrics. Also trigger when the user mentions "code rot", "legacy cleanup", "refactoring priorities", or wants to understand the overall health of a project before a major effort. Trigger even if the user doesn't say "technical debt" explicitly — any request to systematically assess code quality and identify improvement priorities belongs here.
readonly-sql-guard
Make an agent's database access provably read-only. Use when an agent runs caller-supplied SQL against a production/ERP/analytics database (a "query" MCP tool, text-to-SQL, an admin console), or when reviewing DB-access code for write/DDL/side-effect/transaction-escape risks. Checks what a statement CALLS, not just its shape.
web-artifacts-builder
Suite of tools for creating elaborate, multi-component claude.ai HTML artifacts using modern frontend web technologies (React, Tailwind CSS, shadcn/ui). Use for complex artifacts requiring state management, routing, or shadcn/ui components - not for simple single-file HTML/JSX artifacts.
webapp-testing
Toolkit for interacting with and testing local web applications using Playwright. Supports verifying frontend functionality, debugging UI behavior, capturing browser screenshots, and viewing browser logs.
discernment-nudge
After you give a substantive answer or draft that the user may act on — advice or recommendations, drafted artifacts such as goals, plans, pitches, proposals, or emails, estimates or projections, analysis or interpretation of data, factual claims they may rely on, or a multi-step argument — invoke this skill BEFORE finalizing your reply and then, if it applies, append 2-3 short follow-up questions, each tied to something specific in what you just produced, that help the user check key facts, probe the reasoning or assumptions, and notice missing context. Do this at most once per conversation. Skip it when the user asked a trivial how-to or simple lookup, wants a purely educational explanation, asked you only to format, convert, or assemble a file from content they provided, is writing code they will run, is doing creative writing or casual chat, or already asked you to double-check, cite, or review — the skill file explains these boundaries and the exact output format.