[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"skill:01M6ADPA8Y0CQ8RVVNHHWHWGA7":3,"skill-same:01M6ADPA8Y0CQ8RVVNHHWHWGA7":119},{"skillNo":4,"name":5,"nameZh":6,"description":7,"descriptionZh":6,"repositoryFullName":8,"ownerLogin":9,"ownerAvatarUrl":10,"ownerAccountNo":11,"ownerDisplayName":12,"repositoryNo":13,"starsCount":14,"licenseSpdxId":15,"licenseFileUrl":6,"sourceHtmlUrl":16,"categories":17,"keywords":18,"publishedAt":45,"linkOnly":46,"markdownContent":47,"markdownBody":48,"frontMatter":49,"refName":63,"commitSha":64,"skillDirectory":65,"forksCount":66,"repositoryHtmlUrl":67,"repositoryHomepageUrl":68,"ownerHtmlUrl":69,"ownerBlogUrl":70,"ownerDescription":71,"updatedAt":72,"install":73,"resources":86},"01M6ADPA8Y0CQ8RVVNHHWHWGA7","emerging-techniques-moe-training",null,"Train Mixture of Experts (MoE) models using DeepSpeed or HuggingFace. Use when training large-scale models with limited compute (5× cost reduction vs dense models), implementing sparse architectures like Mixtral 8x7B or DeepSeek-V3, or scaling model capacity without proportional compute increase. Covers MoE architectures, routing mechanisms, load balancing, expert parallelism, and inference optimization.","davila7\u002Fclaude-code-templates","davila7","https:\u002F\u002Favatars.githubusercontent.com\u002Fu\u002F6216945?v=4","01M6ADEWWFPS191NFM0Y1EX1JH","Daniel Avila","01M6ADJHGM78PHQRD3XZTFDVKK",33481,"MIT","https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002Fdavila7\u002Fclaude-code-templates\u002Fblob\u002Fmain\u002Fcli-tool\u002Fcomponents\u002Fskills\u002Fai-research\u002Femerging-techniques-moe-training\u002FSKILL.md",[],[19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27,28,29,30,31,32,33,34,35,36,37,38,39,40,41,42,43,44],"training","techniques","moe training","emerging techniques moe training","moe","Emerging Techniques","architectures","when","implementing","experts","Efficient Training","Mixtral","Expert Parallelism","Sparse Models","Mixture Of Experts","Accelerate","inference","scaling","expert","model","Transformers","Optimization","DeepSpeed","routing","capacity","research","2026-11-10 10:12:30",false,"---\nname: emerging-techniques-moe-training\ndescription: Train Mixture of Experts (MoE) models using DeepSpeed or HuggingFace. Use when training large-scale models with limited compute (5× cost reduction vs dense models), implementing sparse architectures like Mixtral 8x7B or DeepSeek-V3, or scaling model capacity without proportional compute increase. Covers MoE architectures, routing mechanisms, load balancing, expert parallelism, and inference optimization.\nlicense: MIT\nmetadata:\n  version: 1.0.0\n  author: Orchestra Research\n  tags: [Emerging Techniques, MoE, Mixture Of Experts, Sparse Models, DeepSpeed, Expert Parallelism, Mixtral, DeepSeek, Routing, Load Balancing, Efficient Training]\n  dependencies: [deepspeed, transformers, torch, accelerate]\n---\n\n# MoE Training: Mixture of Experts\n\n## When to Use This Skill\n\nUse MoE Training when you need to:\n- **Train larger models** with limited compute (5× cost reduction vs dense models)\n- **Scale model capacity** without proportional compute increase\n- **Achieve better performance** per compute budget than dense models\n- **Specialize experts** for different domains\u002Ftasks\u002Flanguages\n- **Reduce inference latency** with sparse activation (only 13B\u002F47B params active in Mixtral)\n- **Implement SOTA models** like Mixtral 8x7B, DeepSeek-V3, Switch Transformers\n\n**Notable MoE Models**: Mixtral 8x7B (Mistral AI), DeepSeek-V3, Switch Transformers (Google), GLaM (Google), NLLB-MoE (Meta)\n\n## Installation\n\n```bash\n# DeepSpeed with MoE support\npip install deepspeed>=0.6.0\n\n# Megatron-DeepSpeed for large-scale training\ngit clone https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002Fmicrosoft\u002FMegatron-DeepSpeed\ncd Megatron-DeepSpeed\npip install -r requirements.txt\n\n# Alternative: HuggingFace Transformers\npip install transformers accelerate\n```\n\n## Quick Start\n\n### Basic MoE Architecture\n\n```python\nimport torch\nimport torch.nn as nn\n\nclass MoELayer(nn.Module):\n    \"\"\"Sparse Mixture of Experts layer.\"\"\"\n\n    def __init__(self, hidden_size, num_experts=8, top_k=2):\n        super().__init__()\n        self.num_experts = num_experts\n        self.top_k = top_k\n\n        # Expert networks (FFN)\n        self.experts = nn.ModuleList([\n            nn.Sequential(\n                nn.Linear(hidden_size, 4 * hidden_size),\n                nn.GELU(),\n                nn.Linear(4 * hidden_size, hidden_size)\n            )\n            for _ in range(num_experts)\n        ])\n\n        # Gating network (router)\n        self.gate = nn.Linear(hidden_size, num_experts)\n\n    def forward(self, x):\n        # x shape: (batch_size, seq_len, hidden_size)\n        batch_size, seq_len, hidden_size = x.shape\n\n        # Flatten for routing\n        x_flat = x.view(-1, hidden_size)  # (batch_size * seq_len, hidden_size)\n\n        # Compute gate scores\n        gate_logits = self.gate(x_flat)  # (batch_size * seq_len, num_experts)\n\n        # Top-k routing\n        gate_scores = torch.softmax(gate_logits, dim=-1)\n        topk_scores, topk_indices = torch.topk(gate_scores, self.top_k, dim=-1)\n\n        # Normalize top-k scores\n        topk_scores = topk_scores \u002F topk_scores.sum(dim=-1, keepdim=True)\n\n        # Dispatch and combine expert outputs\n        output = torch.zeros_like(x_flat)\n\n        for i in range(self.top_k):\n            expert_idx = topk_indices[:, i]\n            expert_scores = topk_scores[:, i].unsqueeze(-1)\n\n            # Route tokens to experts\n            for expert_id in range(self.num_experts):\n                mask = (expert_idx == expert_id)\n                if mask.any():\n                    expert_input = x_flat[mask]\n                    expert_output = self.experts[expert_id](expert_input)\n                    output[mask] += expert_scores[mask] * expert_output\n\n        # Reshape back\n        return output.view(batch_size, seq_len, hidden_size)\n```\n\n### DeepSpeed MoE Training\n\n```bash\n# Training script with MoE\ndeepspeed pretrain_gpt_moe.py \\\n  --num-layers 24 \\\n  --hidden-size 1024 \\\n  --num-attention-heads 16 \\\n  --seq-length 2048 \\\n  --max-position-embeddings 2048 \\\n  --micro-batch-size 4 \\\n  --global-batch-size 256 \\\n  --train-iters 500000 \\\n  --lr 0.0001 \\\n  --min-lr 0.00001 \\\n  --lr-decay-style cosine \\\n  --num-experts 128 \\\n  --moe-expert-parallel-size 4 \\\n  --moe-loss-coeff 0.01 \\\n  --moe-train-capacity-factor 1.25 \\\n  --moe-eval-capacity-factor 2.0 \\\n  --fp16 \\\n  --deepspeed_config ds_config.json\n```\n\n## Core Concepts\n\n### 1. MoE Architecture\n\n**Key Components:**\n- **Experts**: Multiple specialized FFN networks (typically 8-128)\n- **Router\u002FGate**: Learned network that selects which experts to use\n- **Top-k Routing**: Activate only k experts per token (k=1 or k=2)\n- **Load Balancing**: Ensure even expert utilization\n\n```\nInput Token\n    ↓\nRouter (Gate Network)\n    ↓\nTop-k Expert Selection (e.g., 2 out of 8)\n    ↓\nExpert 1 (weight: 0.6) + Expert 5 (weight: 0.4)\n    ↓\nWeighted Combination\n    ↓\nOutput\n```\n\n### 2. Routing Mechanisms\n\n**Top-1 Routing (Switch Transformer):**\n```python\n# Simplest routing: one expert per token\ngate_logits = router(x)  # (batch, seq_len, num_experts)\nexpert_idx = torch.argmax(gate_logits, dim=-1)  # Hard routing\n```\n\n**Top-2 Routing (Mixtral):**\n```python\n# Top-2: two experts per token\ngate_scores = torch.softmax(router(x), dim=-1)\ntop2_scores, top2_indices = torch.topk(gate_scores, k=2, dim=-1)\n\n# Normalize scores\ntop2_scores = top2_scores \u002F top2_scores.sum(dim=-1, keepdim=True)\n\n# Combine expert outputs\noutput = (top2_scores[:, :, 0:1] * expert_outputs[top2_indices[:, :, 0]] +\n          top2_scores[:, :, 1:2] * expert_outputs[top2_indices[:, :, 1]])\n```\n\n**Expert Choice Routing:**\n```python\n# Experts choose top-k tokens (instead of tokens choosing experts)\n# Guarantees perfect load balancing\nexpert_scores = router(x).transpose(-1, -2)  # (batch, num_experts, seq_len)\ntopk_tokens = torch.topk(expert_scores, k=capacity_per_expert, dim=-1)\n```\n\n### 3. Load Balancing\n\n**Auxiliary Loss:**\n```python\ndef load_balancing_loss(gate_logits, expert_indices, num_experts):\n    \"\"\"Encourage uniform expert usage.\"\"\"\n    # Fraction of tokens routed to each expert\n    expert_counts = torch.bincount(expert_indices.flatten(), minlength=num_experts)\n    expert_fraction = expert_counts.float() \u002F expert_indices.numel()\n\n    # Gate probability for each expert (average across tokens)\n    gate_probs = torch.softmax(gate_logits, dim=-1).mean(dim=0)\n\n    # Auxiliary loss: encourage alignment\n    aux_loss = num_experts * (expert_fraction * gate_probs).sum()\n\n    return aux_loss\n\n# Add to main loss\ntotal_loss = language_model_loss + 0.01 * load_balancing_loss(...)\n```\n\n**Router Z-Loss (Stability):**\n```python\ndef router_z_loss(logits):\n    \"\"\"Encourage router to have lower entropy (more decisive).\"\"\"\n    z_loss = torch.logsumexp(logits, dim=-1).pow(2).mean()\n    return z_loss\n\ntotal_loss = lm_loss + 0.01 * aux_loss + 0.001 * router_z_loss(gate_logits)\n```\n\n### 4. Expert Parallelism\n\n```python\n# DeepSpeed configuration\n{\n  \"train_batch_size\": 256,\n  \"fp16\": {\"enabled\": true},\n  \"moe\": {\n    \"enabled\": true,\n    \"num_experts\": 128,\n    \"expert_parallel_size\": 8,  # Distribute 128 experts across 8 GPUs\n    \"capacity_factor\": 1.25,    # Expert capacity = tokens_per_batch * capacity_factor \u002F num_experts\n    \"drop_tokens\": true,        # Drop tokens exceeding capacity\n    \"use_residual\": false\n  }\n}\n```\n\n## Training Configuration\n\n### DeepSpeed MoE Config\n\n```json\n{\n  \"train_batch_size\": 256,\n  \"gradient_accumulation_steps\": 1,\n  \"optimizer\": {\n    \"type\": \"Adam\",\n    \"params\": {\n      \"lr\": 0.0001,\n      \"betas\": [0.9, 0.999],\n      \"eps\": 1e-8\n    }\n  },\n  \"fp16\": {\n    \"enabled\": true,\n    \"loss_scale\": 0,\n    \"initial_scale_power\": 16\n  },\n  \"moe\": {\n    \"enabled\": true,\n    \"num_experts\": 128,\n    \"expert_parallel_size\": 8,\n    \"moe_loss_coeff\": 0.01,\n    \"train_capacity_factor\": 1.25,\n    \"eval_capacity_factor\": 2.0,\n    \"min_capacity\": 4,\n    \"drop_tokens\": true,\n    \"use_residual\": false,\n    \"use_tutel\": false\n  },\n  \"zero_optimization\": {\n    \"stage\": 1\n  }\n}\n```\n\n### Training Script\n\n```bash\n#!\u002Fbin\u002Fbash\n\n# Mixtral-style MoE training\ndeepspeed --num_gpus 8 pretrain_moe.py \\\n  --model-parallel-size 1 \\\n  --num-layers 32 \\\n  --hidden-size 4096 \\\n  --num-attention-heads 32 \\\n  --seq-length 2048 \\\n  --max-position-embeddings 4096 \\\n  --micro-batch-size 2 \\\n  --global-batch-size 256 \\\n  --train-iters 500000 \\\n  --save-interval 5000 \\\n  --eval-interval 1000 \\\n  --eval-iters 100 \\\n  --lr 0.0001 \\\n  --min-lr 0.00001 \\\n  --lr-decay-style cosine \\\n  --lr-warmup-iters 2000 \\\n  --clip-grad 1.0 \\\n  --weight-decay 0.1 \\\n  --num-experts 8 \\\n  --moe-expert-parallel-size 4 \\\n  --moe-loss-coeff 0.01 \\\n  --moe-train-capacity-factor 1.25 \\\n  --moe-eval-capacity-factor 2.0 \\\n  --disable-moe-token-dropping \\\n  --fp16 \\\n  --deepspeed \\\n  --deepspeed_config ds_config_moe.json \\\n  --data-path \u002Fpath\u002Fto\u002Fdata \\\n  --vocab-file \u002Fpath\u002Fto\u002Fvocab.json \\\n  --merge-file \u002Fpath\u002Fto\u002Fmerges.txt\n```\n\n## Advanced Patterns\n\n### Mixtral 8x7B Architecture\n\n```python\nclass MixtralMoEBlock(nn.Module):\n    \"\"\"Mixtral-style MoE block with 8 experts, top-2 routing.\"\"\"\n\n    def __init__(self, config):\n        super().__init__()\n        self.hidden_dim = config.hidden_size\n        self.ffn_dim = config.intermediate_size\n        self.num_experts = config.num_local_experts  # 8\n        self.top_k = config.num_experts_per_tok       # 2\n\n        # 8 expert FFNs\n        self.experts = nn.ModuleList([\n            nn.Sequential(\n                nn.Linear(self.hidden_dim, self.ffn_dim, bias=False),\n                nn.SiLU(),\n                nn.Linear(self.ffn_dim, self.hidden_dim, bias=False)\n            )\n            for _ in range(self.num_experts)\n        ])\n\n        # Router\n        self.gate = nn.Linear(self.hidden_dim, self.num_experts, bias=False)\n\n    def forward(self, hidden_states):\n        batch_size, sequence_length, hidden_dim = hidden_states.shape\n\n        # Flatten\n        hidden_states = hidden_states.view(-1, hidden_dim)\n\n        # Router logits\n        router_logits = self.gate(hidden_states)  # (batch * seq_len, num_experts)\n\n        # Softmax and top-2\n        routing_weights = torch.softmax(router_logits, dim=1)\n        routing_weights, selected_experts = torch.topk(routing_weights, self.top_k, dim=-1)\n\n        # Normalize routing weights\n        routing_weights \u002F= routing_weights.sum(dim=-1, keepdim=True)\n\n        # Initialize output\n        final_hidden_states = torch.zeros_like(hidden_states)\n\n        # Route to experts\n        for expert_idx in range(self.num_experts):\n            expert_layer = self.experts[expert_idx]\n            idx, top_x = torch.where(selected_experts == expert_idx)\n\n            if idx.shape[0] == 0:\n                continue\n\n            # Current expert tokens\n            current_hidden_states = hidden_states[idx]\n\n            # Expert forward\n            current_hidden_states = expert_layer(current_hidden_states)\n\n            # Weighted by routing scores\n            current_hidden_states *= routing_weights[idx, top_x, None]\n\n            # Accumulate\n            final_hidden_states.index_add_(0, idx, current_hidden_states)\n\n        # Reshape\n        return final_hidden_states.view(batch_size, sequence_length, hidden_dim)\n```\n\n### PR-MoE (Pyramid-Residual-MoE)\n\n```bash\n# DeepSpeed PR-MoE: 3x better parameter efficiency\ndeepspeed pretrain_gpt_moe.py \\\n  --num-layers 24 \\\n  --hidden-size 1024 \\\n  --num-attention-heads 16 \\\n  --num-experts \"[128, 64, 32, 16]\" \\\n  --mlp-type residual \\\n  --moe-expert-parallel-size 4 \\\n  --moe-loss-coeff 0.01 \\\n  --fp16\n```\n\n## Best Practices\n\n### 1. Expert Count Selection\n\n```python\n# Rule of thumb: More experts = more capacity, but diminishing returns\n# Typical configurations:\n# - Small models (1B-7B): 8-16 experts\n# - Medium models (7B-30B): 8-64 experts\n# - Large models (30B+): 64-256 experts\n\n# Example: Mixtral 8x7B\n# Total params: 47B (8 experts × 7B each)\n# Active params: 13B (2 experts × 7B, top-2 routing)\n# Efficiency: 47B capacity with 13B compute\n```\n\n### 2. Capacity Factor Tuning\n\n```python\n# Capacity = (tokens_per_batch \u002F num_experts) * capacity_factor\n\n# Training: Lower capacity (faster, drops some tokens)\ntrain_capacity_factor = 1.25  # 25% buffer\n\n# Evaluation: Higher capacity (no dropping)\neval_capacity_factor = 2.0    # 100% buffer\n\n# Formula:\nexpert_capacity = int((seq_len * batch_size \u002F num_experts) * capacity_factor)\n```\n\n### 3. Learning Rate Guidelines\n\n```python\n# MoE models need lower LR than dense models\n# - Dense model: lr = 6e-4\n# - MoE model: lr = 1e-4 (3-6× lower)\n\n# Also extend decay schedule\ndense_lr_decay_iters = 300000\nmoe_lr_decay_iters = 500000  # 1.5-2× longer\n```\n\n### 4. Loss Coefficient Tuning\n\n```python\n# Start with standard values\nmoe_loss_coeff = 0.01    # Auxiliary loss (load balancing)\nrouter_z_loss_coeff = 0.001  # Router entropy (stability)\n\n# If load imbalance persists, increase aux loss\nif max_expert_usage \u002F min_expert_usage > 2.0:\n    moe_loss_coeff = 0.1  # Stronger load balancing\n\n# If training unstable, increase z-loss\nif grad_norm > 10.0:\n    router_z_loss_coeff = 0.01\n```\n\n### 5. Avoid Common Pitfalls\n\n```python\n# ❌ Bad: Using same LR as dense model\noptimizer = Adam(model.parameters(), lr=6e-4)\n\n# ✅ Good: Lower LR for MoE\noptimizer = Adam([\n    {'params': model.non_moe_params, 'lr': 6e-4},\n    {'params': model.moe_params, 'lr': 1e-4}\n])\n\n# ❌ Bad: No load balancing\nloss = lm_loss\n\n# ✅ Good: Add auxiliary loss\nloss = lm_loss + 0.01 * aux_loss + 0.001 * z_loss\n\n# ❌ Bad: Too many experts for small dataset\nnum_experts = 128  # Overfitting risk\n\n# ✅ Good: Match experts to data diversity\nnum_experts = 8  # Better for small datasets\n```\n\n## Inference Optimization\n\n### Sparse Inference\n\n```python\n# Only activate top-k experts (huge memory savings)\n@torch.no_grad()\ndef moe_inference(x, model, top_k=2):\n    \"\"\"Sparse MoE inference: only load k experts.\"\"\"\n    # Router\n    gate_logits = model.gate(x)\n    topk_scores, topk_indices = torch.topk(\n        torch.softmax(gate_logits, dim=-1),\n        k=top_k,\n        dim=-1\n    )\n\n    # Load and run only top-k experts\n    output = torch.zeros_like(x)\n    for i in range(top_k):\n        expert_idx = topk_indices[:, i]\n        # Load expert from disk\u002Foffload if needed\n        expert = model.load_expert(expert_idx)\n        output += topk_scores[:, i:i+1] * expert(x)\n\n    return output\n```\n\n## Resources\n\n- **DeepSpeed MoE Tutorial**: https:\u002F\u002Fwww.deepspeed.ai\u002Ftutorials\u002Fmixture-of-experts-nlg\u002F\n- **Mixtral Paper**: https:\u002F\u002Farxiv.org\u002Fabs\u002F2401.04088\n- **Switch Transformers**: https:\u002F\u002Farxiv.org\u002Fabs\u002F2101.03961\n- **HuggingFace MoE Guide**: https:\u002F\u002Fhuggingface.co\u002Fblog\u002Fmoe\n- **NVIDIA MoE Blog**: https:\u002F\u002Fdeveloper.nvidia.com\u002Fblog\u002Fapplying-mixture-of-experts-in-llm-architectures\u002F\n\n## See Also\n\n- `references\u002Farchitectures.md` - MoE model architectures (Mixtral, Switch, DeepSeek-V3)\n- `references\u002Ftraining.md` - Advanced training techniques and optimization\n- `references\u002Finference.md` - Production deployment and serving patterns\n\n\n","# MoE Training: Mixture of Experts\n\n## When to Use This Skill\n\nUse MoE Training when you need to:\n- **Train larger models** with limited compute (5× cost reduction vs dense models)\n- **Scale model capacity** without proportional compute increase\n- **Achieve better performance** per compute budget than dense models\n- **Specialize experts** for different domains\u002Ftasks\u002Flanguages\n- **Reduce inference latency** with sparse activation (only 13B\u002F47B params active in Mixtral)\n- **Implement SOTA models** like Mixtral 8x7B, DeepSeek-V3, Switch Transformers\n\n**Notable MoE Models**: Mixtral 8x7B (Mistral AI), DeepSeek-V3, Switch Transformers (Google), GLaM (Google), NLLB-MoE (Meta)\n\n## Installation\n\n```bash\n# DeepSpeed with MoE support\npip install deepspeed>=0.6.0\n\n# Megatron-DeepSpeed for large-scale training\ngit clone https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002Fmicrosoft\u002FMegatron-DeepSpeed\ncd Megatron-DeepSpeed\npip install -r requirements.txt\n\n# Alternative: HuggingFace Transformers\npip install transformers accelerate\n```\n\n## Quick Start\n\n### Basic MoE Architecture\n\n```python\nimport torch\nimport torch.nn as nn\n\nclass MoELayer(nn.Module):\n    \"\"\"Sparse Mixture of Experts layer.\"\"\"\n\n    def __init__(self, hidden_size, num_experts=8, top_k=2):\n        super().__init__()\n        self.num_experts = num_experts\n        self.top_k = top_k\n\n        # Expert networks (FFN)\n        self.experts = nn.ModuleList([\n            nn.Sequential(\n                nn.Linear(hidden_size, 4 * hidden_size),\n                nn.GELU(),\n                nn.Linear(4 * hidden_size, hidden_size)\n            )\n            for _ in range(num_experts)\n        ])\n\n        # Gating network (router)\n        self.gate = nn.Linear(hidden_size, num_experts)\n\n    def forward(self, x):\n        # x shape: (batch_size, seq_len, hidden_size)\n        batch_size, seq_len, hidden_size = x.shape\n\n        # Flatten for routing\n        x_flat = x.view(-1, hidden_size)  # (batch_size * seq_len, hidden_size)\n\n        # Compute gate scores\n        gate_logits = self.gate(x_flat)  # (batch_size * seq_len, num_experts)\n\n        # Top-k routing\n        gate_scores = torch.softmax(gate_logits, dim=-1)\n        topk_scores, topk_indices = torch.topk(gate_scores, self.top_k, dim=-1)\n\n        # Normalize top-k scores\n        topk_scores = topk_scores \u002F topk_scores.sum(dim=-1, keepdim=True)\n\n        # Dispatch and combine expert outputs\n        output = torch.zeros_like(x_flat)\n\n        for i in range(self.top_k):\n            expert_idx = topk_indices[:, i]\n            expert_scores = topk_scores[:, i].unsqueeze(-1)\n\n            # Route tokens to experts\n            for expert_id in range(self.num_experts):\n                mask = (expert_idx == expert_id)\n                if mask.any():\n                    expert_input = x_flat[mask]\n                    expert_output = self.experts[expert_id](expert_input)\n                    output[mask] += expert_scores[mask] * expert_output\n\n        # Reshape back\n        return output.view(batch_size, seq_len, hidden_size)\n```\n\n### DeepSpeed MoE Training\n\n```bash\n# Training script with MoE\ndeepspeed pretrain_gpt_moe.py \\\n  --num-layers 24 \\\n  --hidden-size 1024 \\\n  --num-attention-heads 16 \\\n  --seq-length 2048 \\\n  --max-position-embeddings 2048 \\\n  --micro-batch-size 4 \\\n  --global-batch-size 256 \\\n  --train-iters 500000 \\\n  --lr 0.0001 \\\n  --min-lr 0.00001 \\\n  --lr-decay-style cosine \\\n  --num-experts 128 \\\n  --moe-expert-parallel-size 4 \\\n  --moe-loss-coeff 0.01 \\\n  --moe-train-capacity-factor 1.25 \\\n  --moe-eval-capacity-factor 2.0 \\\n  --fp16 \\\n  --deepspeed_config ds_config.json\n```\n\n## Core Concepts\n\n### 1. MoE Architecture\n\n**Key Components:**\n- **Experts**: Multiple specialized FFN networks (typically 8-128)\n- **Router\u002FGate**: Learned network that selects which experts to use\n- **Top-k Routing**: Activate only k experts per token (k=1 or k=2)\n- **Load Balancing**: Ensure even expert utilization\n\n```\nInput Token\n    ↓\nRouter (Gate Network)\n    ↓\nTop-k Expert Selection (e.g., 2 out of 8)\n    ↓\nExpert 1 (weight: 0.6) + Expert 5 (weight: 0.4)\n    ↓\nWeighted Combination\n    ↓\nOutput\n```\n\n### 2. Routing Mechanisms\n\n**Top-1 Routing (Switch Transformer):**\n```python\n# Simplest routing: one expert per token\ngate_logits = router(x)  # (batch, seq_len, num_experts)\nexpert_idx = torch.argmax(gate_logits, dim=-1)  # Hard routing\n```\n\n**Top-2 Routing (Mixtral):**\n```python\n# Top-2: two experts per token\ngate_scores = torch.softmax(router(x), dim=-1)\ntop2_scores, top2_indices = torch.topk(gate_scores, k=2, dim=-1)\n\n# Normalize scores\ntop2_scores = top2_scores \u002F top2_scores.sum(dim=-1, keepdim=True)\n\n# Combine expert outputs\noutput = (top2_scores[:, :, 0:1] * expert_outputs[top2_indices[:, :, 0]] +\n          top2_scores[:, :, 1:2] * expert_outputs[top2_indices[:, :, 1]])\n```\n\n**Expert Choice Routing:**\n```python\n# Experts choose top-k tokens (instead of tokens choosing experts)\n# Guarantees perfect load balancing\nexpert_scores = router(x).transpose(-1, -2)  # (batch, num_experts, seq_len)\ntopk_tokens = torch.topk(expert_scores, k=capacity_per_expert, dim=-1)\n```\n\n### 3. Load Balancing\n\n**Auxiliary Loss:**\n```python\ndef load_balancing_loss(gate_logits, expert_indices, num_experts):\n    \"\"\"Encourage uniform expert usage.\"\"\"\n    # Fraction of tokens routed to each expert\n    expert_counts = torch.bincount(expert_indices.flatten(), minlength=num_experts)\n    expert_fraction = expert_counts.float() \u002F expert_indices.numel()\n\n    # Gate probability for each expert (average across tokens)\n    gate_probs = torch.softmax(gate_logits, dim=-1).mean(dim=0)\n\n    # Auxiliary loss: encourage alignment\n    aux_loss = num_experts * (expert_fraction * gate_probs).sum()\n\n    return aux_loss\n\n# Add to main loss\ntotal_loss = language_model_loss + 0.01 * load_balancing_loss(...)\n```\n\n**Router Z-Loss (Stability):**\n```python\ndef router_z_loss(logits):\n    \"\"\"Encourage router to have lower entropy (more decisive).\"\"\"\n    z_loss = torch.logsumexp(logits, dim=-1).pow(2).mean()\n    return z_loss\n\ntotal_loss = lm_loss + 0.01 * aux_loss + 0.001 * router_z_loss(gate_logits)\n```\n\n### 4. Expert Parallelism\n\n```python\n# DeepSpeed configuration\n{\n  \"train_batch_size\": 256,\n  \"fp16\": {\"enabled\": true},\n  \"moe\": {\n    \"enabled\": true,\n    \"num_experts\": 128,\n    \"expert_parallel_size\": 8,  # Distribute 128 experts across 8 GPUs\n    \"capacity_factor\": 1.25,    # Expert capacity = tokens_per_batch * capacity_factor \u002F num_experts\n    \"drop_tokens\": true,        # Drop tokens exceeding capacity\n    \"use_residual\": false\n  }\n}\n```\n\n## Training Configuration\n\n### DeepSpeed MoE Config\n\n```json\n{\n  \"train_batch_size\": 256,\n  \"gradient_accumulation_steps\": 1,\n  \"optimizer\": {\n    \"type\": \"Adam\",\n    \"params\": {\n      \"lr\": 0.0001,\n      \"betas\": [0.9, 0.999],\n      \"eps\": 1e-8\n    }\n  },\n  \"fp16\": {\n    \"enabled\": true,\n    \"loss_scale\": 0,\n    \"initial_scale_power\": 16\n  },\n  \"moe\": {\n    \"enabled\": true,\n    \"num_experts\": 128,\n    \"expert_parallel_size\": 8,\n    \"moe_loss_coeff\": 0.01,\n    \"train_capacity_factor\": 1.25,\n    \"eval_capacity_factor\": 2.0,\n    \"min_capacity\": 4,\n    \"drop_tokens\": true,\n    \"use_residual\": false,\n    \"use_tutel\": false\n  },\n  \"zero_optimization\": {\n    \"stage\": 1\n  }\n}\n```\n\n### Training Script\n\n```bash\n#!\u002Fbin\u002Fbash\n\n# Mixtral-style MoE training\ndeepspeed --num_gpus 8 pretrain_moe.py \\\n  --model-parallel-size 1 \\\n  --num-layers 32 \\\n  --hidden-size 4096 \\\n  --num-attention-heads 32 \\\n  --seq-length 2048 \\\n  --max-position-embeddings 4096 \\\n  --micro-batch-size 2 \\\n  --global-batch-size 256 \\\n  --train-iters 500000 \\\n  --save-interval 5000 \\\n  --eval-interval 1000 \\\n  --eval-iters 100 \\\n  --lr 0.0001 \\\n  --min-lr 0.00001 \\\n  --lr-decay-style cosine \\\n  --lr-warmup-iters 2000 \\\n  --clip-grad 1.0 \\\n  --weight-decay 0.1 \\\n  --num-experts 8 \\\n  --moe-expert-parallel-size 4 \\\n  --moe-loss-coeff 0.01 \\\n  --moe-train-capacity-factor 1.25 \\\n  --moe-eval-capacity-factor 2.0 \\\n  --disable-moe-token-dropping \\\n  --fp16 \\\n  --deepspeed \\\n  --deepspeed_config ds_config_moe.json \\\n  --data-path \u002Fpath\u002Fto\u002Fdata \\\n  --vocab-file \u002Fpath\u002Fto\u002Fvocab.json \\\n  --merge-file \u002Fpath\u002Fto\u002Fmerges.txt\n```\n\n## Advanced Patterns\n\n### Mixtral 8x7B Architecture\n\n```python\nclass MixtralMoEBlock(nn.Module):\n    \"\"\"Mixtral-style MoE block with 8 experts, top-2 routing.\"\"\"\n\n    def __init__(self, config):\n        super().__init__()\n        self.hidden_dim = config.hidden_size\n        self.ffn_dim = config.intermediate_size\n        self.num_experts = config.num_local_experts  # 8\n        self.top_k = config.num_experts_per_tok       # 2\n\n        # 8 expert FFNs\n        self.experts = nn.ModuleList([\n            nn.Sequential(\n                nn.Linear(self.hidden_dim, self.ffn_dim, bias=False),\n                nn.SiLU(),\n                nn.Linear(self.ffn_dim, self.hidden_dim, bias=False)\n            )\n            for _ in range(self.num_experts)\n        ])\n\n        # Router\n        self.gate = nn.Linear(self.hidden_dim, self.num_experts, bias=False)\n\n    def forward(self, hidden_states):\n        batch_size, sequence_length, hidden_dim = hidden_states.shape\n\n        # Flatten\n        hidden_states = hidden_states.view(-1, hidden_dim)\n\n        # Router logits\n        router_logits = self.gate(hidden_states)  # (batch * seq_len, num_experts)\n\n        # Softmax and top-2\n        routing_weights = torch.softmax(router_logits, dim=1)\n        routing_weights, selected_experts = torch.topk(routing_weights, self.top_k, dim=-1)\n\n        # Normalize routing weights\n        routing_weights \u002F= routing_weights.sum(dim=-1, keepdim=True)\n\n        # Initialize output\n        final_hidden_states = torch.zeros_like(hidden_states)\n\n        # Route to experts\n        for expert_idx in range(self.num_experts):\n            expert_layer = self.experts[expert_idx]\n            idx, top_x = torch.where(selected_experts == expert_idx)\n\n            if idx.shape[0] == 0:\n                continue\n\n            # Current expert tokens\n            current_hidden_states = hidden_states[idx]\n\n            # Expert forward\n            current_hidden_states = expert_layer(current_hidden_states)\n\n            # Weighted by routing scores\n            current_hidden_states *= routing_weights[idx, top_x, None]\n\n            # Accumulate\n            final_hidden_states.index_add_(0, idx, current_hidden_states)\n\n        # Reshape\n        return final_hidden_states.view(batch_size, sequence_length, hidden_dim)\n```\n\n### PR-MoE (Pyramid-Residual-MoE)\n\n```bash\n# DeepSpeed PR-MoE: 3x better parameter efficiency\ndeepspeed pretrain_gpt_moe.py \\\n  --num-layers 24 \\\n  --hidden-size 1024 \\\n  --num-attention-heads 16 \\\n  --num-experts \"[128, 64, 32, 16]\" \\\n  --mlp-type residual \\\n  --moe-expert-parallel-size 4 \\\n  --moe-loss-coeff 0.01 \\\n  --fp16\n```\n\n## Best Practices\n\n### 1. Expert Count Selection\n\n```python\n# Rule of thumb: More experts = more capacity, but diminishing returns\n# Typical configurations:\n# - Small models (1B-7B): 8-16 experts\n# - Medium models (7B-30B): 8-64 experts\n# - Large models (30B+): 64-256 experts\n\n# Example: Mixtral 8x7B\n# Total params: 47B (8 experts × 7B each)\n# Active params: 13B (2 experts × 7B, top-2 routing)\n# Efficiency: 47B capacity with 13B compute\n```\n\n### 2. Capacity Factor Tuning\n\n```python\n# Capacity = (tokens_per_batch \u002F num_experts) * capacity_factor\n\n# Training: Lower capacity (faster, drops some tokens)\ntrain_capacity_factor = 1.25  # 25% buffer\n\n# Evaluation: Higher capacity (no dropping)\neval_capacity_factor = 2.0    # 100% buffer\n\n# Formula:\nexpert_capacity = int((seq_len * batch_size \u002F num_experts) * capacity_factor)\n```\n\n### 3. Learning Rate Guidelines\n\n```python\n# MoE models need lower LR than dense models\n# - Dense model: lr = 6e-4\n# - MoE model: lr = 1e-4 (3-6× lower)\n\n# Also extend decay schedule\ndense_lr_decay_iters = 300000\nmoe_lr_decay_iters = 500000  # 1.5-2× longer\n```\n\n### 4. Loss Coefficient Tuning\n\n```python\n# Start with standard values\nmoe_loss_coeff = 0.01    # Auxiliary loss (load balancing)\nrouter_z_loss_coeff = 0.001  # Router entropy (stability)\n\n# If load imbalance persists, increase aux loss\nif max_expert_usage \u002F min_expert_usage > 2.0:\n    moe_loss_coeff = 0.1  # Stronger load balancing\n\n# If training unstable, increase z-loss\nif grad_norm > 10.0:\n    router_z_loss_coeff = 0.01\n```\n\n### 5. Avoid Common Pitfalls\n\n```python\n# ❌ Bad: Using same LR as dense model\noptimizer = Adam(model.parameters(), lr=6e-4)\n\n# ✅ Good: Lower LR for MoE\noptimizer = Adam([\n    {'params': model.non_moe_params, 'lr': 6e-4},\n    {'params': model.moe_params, 'lr': 1e-4}\n])\n\n# ❌ Bad: No load balancing\nloss = lm_loss\n\n# ✅ Good: Add auxiliary loss\nloss = lm_loss + 0.01 * aux_loss + 0.001 * z_loss\n\n# ❌ Bad: Too many experts for small dataset\nnum_experts = 128  # Overfitting risk\n\n# ✅ Good: Match experts to data diversity\nnum_experts = 8  # Better for small datasets\n```\n\n## Inference Optimization\n\n### Sparse Inference\n\n```python\n# Only activate top-k experts (huge memory savings)\n@torch.no_grad()\ndef moe_inference(x, model, top_k=2):\n    \"\"\"Sparse MoE inference: only load k experts.\"\"\"\n    # Router\n    gate_logits = model.gate(x)\n    topk_scores, topk_indices = torch.topk(\n        torch.softmax(gate_logits, dim=-1),\n        k=top_k,\n        dim=-1\n    )\n\n    # Load and run only top-k experts\n    output = torch.zeros_like(x)\n    for i in range(top_k):\n        expert_idx = topk_indices[:, i]\n        # Load expert from disk\u002Foffload if needed\n        expert = model.load_expert(expert_idx)\n        output += topk_scores[:, i:i+1] * expert(x)\n\n    return output\n```\n\n## Resources\n\n- **DeepSpeed MoE Tutorial**: https:\u002F\u002Fwww.deepspeed.ai\u002Ftutorials\u002Fmixture-of-experts-nlg\u002F\n- **Mixtral Paper**: https:\u002F\u002Farxiv.org\u002Fabs\u002F2401.04088\n- **Switch Transformers**: https:\u002F\u002Farxiv.org\u002Fabs\u002F2101.03961\n- **HuggingFace MoE Guide**: https:\u002F\u002Fhuggingface.co\u002Fblog\u002Fmoe\n- **NVIDIA MoE Blog**: https:\u002F\u002Fdeveloper.nvidia.com\u002Fblog\u002Fapplying-mixture-of-experts-in-llm-architectures\u002F\n\n## See Also\n\n- `references\u002Farchitectures.md` - MoE model architectures (Mixtral, Switch, DeepSeek-V3)\n- `references\u002Ftraining.md` - Advanced training techniques and optimization\n- `references\u002Finference.md` - Production deployment and serving patterns\n\n\n",{"name":5,"license":15,"metadata":50,"description":7},{"tags":51,"author":56,"version":57,"dependencies":58},[24,52,33,32,41,31,30,53,54,55,29],"MoE","DeepSeek","Routing","Load Balancing","Orchestra Research","1.0.0",[59,60,61,62],"deepspeed","transformers","torch","accelerate","main","2b749c82b5d11fac39d9a6e021ce3f5b8a541bd1","cli-tool\u002Fcomponents\u002Fskills\u002Fai-research\u002Femerging-techniques-moe-training",3931,"https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002Fdavila7\u002Fclaude-code-templates","https:\u002F\u002Faitmpl.com","https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002Fdavila7","https:\u002F\u002Fdanielavila.me","Building AI dev tools with LLMs","2026-11-14 06:14:46",{"source":8,"skillName":5,"commands":74,"prompt":84,"zipAvailable":85},[75,78,81],{"tool":76,"command":77},"npx","npx skills add davila7\u002Fclaude-code-templates --skill emerging-techniques-moe-training",{"tool":79,"command":80},"bunx","bunx skills add davila7\u002Fclaude-code-templates --skill emerging-techniques-moe-training",{"tool":82,"command":83},"pnpm","pnpm dlx skills add davila7\u002Fclaude-code-templates --skill emerging-techniques-moe-training","安装技能，技能地址：https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002Fdavila7\u002Fclaude-code-templates\u002Fblob\u002Fmain\u002Fcli-tool\u002Fcomponents\u002Fskills\u002Fai-research\u002Femerging-techniques-moe-training\u002FSKILL.md",true,[87,93,97,101,105,109,115],{"path":88,"resourceType":89,"resourceTypeDesc":90,"sizeBytes":91,"sourceHtmlUrl":92},"references\u002Farchitectures.md","REFERENCE","参考文档",14044,"https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002Fdavila7\u002Fclaude-code-templates\u002Fblob\u002Fmain\u002Fcli-tool\u002Fcomponents\u002Fskills\u002Fai-research\u002Femerging-techniques-moe-training\u002Freferences\u002Farchitectures.md",{"path":94,"resourceType":89,"resourceTypeDesc":90,"sizeBytes":95,"sourceHtmlUrl":96},"references\u002Finference.md",8239,"https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002Fdavila7\u002Fclaude-code-templates\u002Fblob\u002Fmain\u002Fcli-tool\u002Fcomponents\u002Fskills\u002Fai-research\u002Femerging-techniques-moe-training\u002Freferences\u002Finference.md",{"path":98,"resourceType":89,"resourceTypeDesc":90,"sizeBytes":99,"sourceHtmlUrl":100},"references\u002Ftraining.md",9707,"https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002Fdavila7\u002Fclaude-code-templates\u002Fblob\u002Fmain\u002Fcli-tool\u002Fcomponents\u002Fskills\u002Fai-research\u002Femerging-techniques-moe-training\u002Freferences\u002Ftraining.md",{"path":102,"resourceType":89,"resourceTypeDesc":90,"sizeBytes":103,"sourceHtmlUrl":104},"sections\u002Fmanifest.json",771,"https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002Fshengdabai\u002FTony-Claude-Code-Skills\u002Fblob\u002Fmain\u002Fskills\u002Fgstack\u002Fdocument-release\u002Fsections\u002Fmanifest.json",{"path":106,"resourceType":89,"resourceTypeDesc":90,"sizeBytes":107,"sourceHtmlUrl":108},"sections\u002Frelease-body.md",21046,"https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002Fshengdabai\u002FTony-Claude-Code-Skills\u002Fblob\u002Fmain\u002Fskills\u002Fgstack\u002Fdocument-release\u002Fsections\u002Frelease-body.md",{"path":110,"resourceType":111,"resourceTypeDesc":112,"sizeBytes":113,"sourceHtmlUrl":114},"sections\u002Frelease-body.md.tmpl","OTHER","其他",14379,"https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002Fshengdabai\u002FTony-Claude-Code-Skills\u002Fblob\u002Fmain\u002Fskills\u002Fgstack\u002Fdocument-release\u002Fsections\u002Frelease-body.md.tmpl",{"path":116,"resourceType":111,"resourceTypeDesc":112,"sizeBytes":117,"sourceHtmlUrl":118},"SKILL.md.tmpl",6688,"https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002Fshengdabai\u002FTony-Claude-Code-Skills\u002Fblob\u002Fmain\u002Fskills\u002Fgstack\u002Fdocument-release\u002FSKILL.md.tmpl",[120,151,178,211,245,269],{"skillNo":121,"name":122,"nameZh":6,"description":123,"descriptionZh":6,"repositoryFullName":8,"ownerLogin":9,"ownerAvatarUrl":10,"ownerAccountNo":11,"ownerDisplayName":12,"repositoryNo":13,"starsCount":14,"licenseSpdxId":15,"licenseFileUrl":6,"sourceHtmlUrl":124,"categories":125,"keywords":131,"publishedAt":45},"01M70NHBTQ8BV0A2SCAZXEPHCX","wealthville-pool-scoring","Score DeFi liquidity pools before providing liquidity. Returns a 0-100 pool score and an Enter\u002FHold\u002FExit\u002FReduce\u002FAvoid verdict with calibrated confidence for ~68,800 Solana pools and 575 EVM pools, plus a public miss-inclusive track record. Use when asked whether a pool is worth LPing into, which pools look best right now, or how accurate the scores have actually been.","https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002Fdavila7\u002Fclaude-code-templates\u002Fblob\u002Fmain\u002Fcli-tool\u002Fcomponents\u002Fskills\u002Fweb-data\u002Fwealthville-pool-scoring\u002FSKILL.md",[126],{"categoryNo":127,"categoryName":128,"taxonomyType":129,"taxonomyTypeDesc":130},"01JBSEEDCAT000000000000023","Skill与智能体开发","SCENARIO","使用场景",[132,133,134,135,136,137,138,139,140,26,141,142,143,144,145,146,147,148,149,150],"scoring","pool","wealthville pool scoring","liquidity","which","for","exit","now","use","reduce","with","record","track","verdict","evm","solana","how","public","look",{"skillNo":152,"name":153,"nameZh":6,"description":154,"descriptionZh":6,"repositoryFullName":8,"ownerLogin":9,"ownerAvatarUrl":10,"ownerAccountNo":11,"ownerDisplayName":12,"repositoryNo":13,"starsCount":14,"licenseSpdxId":15,"licenseFileUrl":6,"sourceHtmlUrl":155,"categories":156,"keywords":158,"publishedAt":45},"01M70MB6VR8ERJ4EM8D5KHBMEV","technical-debt-auditor","Scans a codebase and produces a quantified technical debt report with a prioritized remediation plan. Analyzes dead code, TODO\u002FFIXME\u002FHACK markers, dependency staleness, complexity hotspots, code duplication signals, test coverage gaps, unused exports, and outdated patterns. Use this skill when the user asks to audit their codebase for tech debt, wants a health check of their code quality, says things like \"where should I focus refactoring\", \"find code smells\", \"audit my codebase\", \"what technical debt do we have\", \"prioritize cleanup work\", or asks about code quality metrics. Also trigger when the user mentions \"code rot\", \"legacy cleanup\", \"refactoring priorities\", or wants to understand the overall health of a project before a major effort. Trigger even if the user doesn't say \"technical debt\" explicitly — any request to systematically assess code quality and identify improvement priorities belongs here.","https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002Fdavila7\u002Fclaude-code-templates\u002Fblob\u002Fmain\u002Fcli-tool\u002Fcomponents\u002Fskills\u002Fdevelopment\u002Ftechnical-debt-auditor\u002FSKILL.md",[157],{"categoryNo":127,"categoryName":128,"taxonomyType":129,"taxonomyTypeDesc":130},[159,160,161,162,163,164,165,166,167,168,169,26,170,171,172,173,174,175,176,177],"technical debt","debt","technical","technical debt auditor","auditor","coverage","complexity","markers","project","cleanup","unused","code","todo","work","plan","focus","signals","audit","dependency",{"skillNo":179,"name":180,"nameZh":6,"description":181,"descriptionZh":6,"repositoryFullName":8,"ownerLogin":9,"ownerAvatarUrl":10,"ownerAccountNo":11,"ownerDisplayName":12,"repositoryNo":13,"starsCount":14,"licenseSpdxId":15,"licenseFileUrl":6,"sourceHtmlUrl":182,"categories":183,"keywords":193,"publishedAt":45},"01M70KPYH9QNHCNME5GJQGE22K","readonly-sql-guard","Make an agent's database access provably read-only. Use when an agent runs caller-supplied SQL against a production\u002FERP\u002Fanalytics database (a \"query\" MCP tool, text-to-SQL, an admin console), or when reviewing DB-access code for write\u002FDDL\u002Fside-effect\u002Ftransaction-escape risks. Checks what a statement CALLS, not just its shape.","https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002Fdavila7\u002Fclaude-code-templates\u002Fblob\u002Fmain\u002Fcli-tool\u002Fcomponents\u002Fskills\u002Fdatabase\u002Freadonly-sql-guard\u002FSKILL.md",[184,187,188],{"categoryNo":185,"categoryName":186,"taxonomyType":129,"taxonomyTypeDesc":130},"01JBSEEDCAT000000000000010","后端与接口",{"categoryNo":127,"categoryName":128,"taxonomyType":129,"taxonomyTypeDesc":130},{"categoryNo":189,"categoryName":190,"taxonomyType":191,"taxonomyTypeDesc":192},"01JBSEEDCAT000000000000033","数据分析师","PROFESSION","适用职业",[194,195,196,197,198,199,200,137,201,202,203,204,205,206,207,140,208,209,26,210],"readonly","guard","sql guard","sql","readonly sql guard","erp","effect","read-only","db","just","tool","calls","only","MCP","access","database","query",{"skillNo":212,"name":213,"nameZh":6,"description":214,"descriptionZh":6,"repositoryFullName":8,"ownerLogin":9,"ownerAvatarUrl":10,"ownerAccountNo":11,"ownerDisplayName":12,"repositoryNo":13,"starsCount":14,"licenseSpdxId":215,"licenseFileUrl":216,"sourceHtmlUrl":217,"categories":218,"keywords":222,"publishedAt":45},"01M6AFY6F7CC2BBZP1QD6VTNVC","web-artifacts-builder","Suite of tools for creating elaborate, multi-component claude.ai HTML artifacts using modern frontend web technologies (React, Tailwind CSS, shadcn\u002Fui). Use for complex artifacts requiring state management, routing, or shadcn\u002Fui components - not for simple single-file HTML\u002FJSX artifacts.","Apache-2.0","https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002Fdavila7\u002Fclaude-code-templates\u002Fblob\u002Fmain\u002Fcli-tool\u002Fcomponents\u002Fskills\u002Futilities\u002Fweb-artifacts-builder\u002FLICENSE.txt","https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002Fdavila7\u002Fclaude-code-templates\u002Fblob\u002Fmain\u002Fcli-tool\u002Fcomponents\u002Fskills\u002Futilities\u002Fweb-artifacts-builder\u002FSKILL.md",[219],{"categoryNo":220,"categoryName":221,"taxonomyType":129,"taxonomyTypeDesc":130},"01JBSEEDCAT000000000000009","前端开发",[223,224,225,226,227,228,42,229,230,231,232,233,234,235,236,237,238,239,240,241,242,243,137,244],"artifacts builder","web","web artifacts builder","artifacts","builder","state","state management","component","css","frontend","ui","Tools","file","components","shadcn","react","Tailwind","suite","jsx","html","single-file","ui components",{"skillNo":246,"name":247,"nameZh":6,"description":248,"descriptionZh":6,"repositoryFullName":8,"ownerLogin":9,"ownerAvatarUrl":10,"ownerAccountNo":11,"ownerDisplayName":12,"repositoryNo":13,"starsCount":14,"licenseSpdxId":215,"licenseFileUrl":249,"sourceHtmlUrl":250,"categories":251,"keywords":256,"publishedAt":45},"01M6AFWF33SFV9Z3SF4PEEE4BF","webapp-testing","Toolkit for interacting with and testing local web applications using Playwright. Supports verifying frontend functionality, debugging UI behavior, capturing browser screenshots, and viewing browser logs.","https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002Fdavila7\u002Fclaude-code-templates\u002Fblob\u002Fmain\u002Fcli-tool\u002Fcomponents\u002Fskills\u002Fsecurity\u002Fwebapp-testing\u002FLICENSE.txt","https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002Fdavila7\u002Fclaude-code-templates\u002Fblob\u002Fmain\u002Fcli-tool\u002Fcomponents\u002Fskills\u002Fsecurity\u002Fwebapp-testing\u002FSKILL.md",[252,255],{"categoryNo":253,"categoryName":254,"taxonomyType":129,"taxonomyTypeDesc":130},"01JBSEEDCAT000000000000008","测试与质量",{"categoryNo":220,"categoryName":221,"taxonomyType":129,"taxonomyTypeDesc":130},[257,258,259,260,261,224,262,232,233,263,264,265,266,137,267,142,268],"webapp testing","testing","webapp","browser","playwright","applications","debugging","toolkit","logs","screenshots","local","behavior",{"skillNo":270,"name":271,"nameZh":6,"description":272,"descriptionZh":6,"repositoryFullName":8,"ownerLogin":9,"ownerAvatarUrl":10,"ownerAccountNo":11,"ownerDisplayName":12,"repositoryNo":13,"starsCount":14,"licenseSpdxId":215,"licenseFileUrl":273,"sourceHtmlUrl":274,"categories":275,"keywords":283,"publishedAt":45},"01M6AF67Q67JJJ5V51JR2P52KA","discernment-nudge","After you give a substantive answer or draft that the user may act on — advice or recommendations, drafted artifacts such as goals, plans, pitches, proposals, or emails, estimates or projections, analysis or interpretation of data, factual claims they may rely on, or a multi-step argument — invoke this skill BEFORE finalizing your reply and then, if it applies, append 2-3 short follow-up questions, each tied to something specific in what you just produced, that help the user check key facts, probe the reasoning or assumptions, and notice missing context. Do this at most once per conversation. Skip it when the user asked a trivial how-to or simple lookup, wants a purely educational explanation, asked you only to format, convert, or assemble a file from content they provided, is writing code they will run, is doing creative writing or casual chat, or already asked you to double-check, cite, or review — the skill file explains these boundaries and the exact output format.","https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002Fdavila7\u002Fclaude-code-templates\u002Fblob\u002Fmain\u002Fcli-tool\u002Fcomponents\u002Fskills\u002Fproductivity\u002Fdiscernment-nudge\u002FLICENSE.txt","https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002Fdavila7\u002Fclaude-code-templates\u002Fblob\u002Fmain\u002Fcli-tool\u002Fcomponents\u002Fskills\u002Fproductivity\u002Fdiscernment-nudge\u002FSKILL.md",[276,279,280],{"categoryNo":277,"categoryName":278,"taxonomyType":129,"taxonomyTypeDesc":130},"01JBSEEDCAT000000000000018","写作与文案",{"categoryNo":127,"categoryName":128,"taxonomyType":129,"taxonomyTypeDesc":130},{"categoryNo":281,"categoryName":282,"taxonomyType":191,"taxonomyTypeDesc":192},"01JBSEEDCAT000000000000036","内容创作者",[284,285,286,287,288,289,290,291,226,292,235,170,293,294,295,296,297,206,298,26,299,300,301,302,303,148,304],"discernment nudge","nudge","interpretation","help","run","reasoning","data","writing","lookup","content","review","conversation","short","up","invoke","you","analysis","claims","argument","assemble","recommendations"]