analyzing-linux-elf-malware
Analyze malicious Linux ELF binaries — botnets, cryptominers, ransomware, and rootkits targeting Linux servers, containers, and cloud infrastructure — through static analysis, dynamic tracing, and reverse engineering of x86_64 and ARM samples. Use when investigating Linux malware, triaging a suspicious ELF binary, assessing a compromised Linux server, or analyzing container-targeted malware.
- License 许可
- Apache-2.0
- 最近更新
- 2026-08-31
- Stars
- ★ 3.6w
- Forks
- 4.4k
01 前言 Front Matter
- name
- analyzing-linux-elf-malware
- tags
- [ "malware", "Linux", "ELF", "reverse-engineering", "server-malware" ]
- author
- mahipal
- domain
- cybersecurity
- license
- Apache-2.0
- version
- 1.0.0
- mitre_f3
- { "tactics": [ "positioning", "monetization", "reconnaissance" ], "version": "1.1", "techniques": [ { "id": "T1219", "name": "Remote Access Tools", "source": "attack", "tactic": "positioning" }, { "id": "T1555", "name": "Credentials from Password Stores", "source": "attack", "tactic": "reconnaissance" }, { "id": "F1018", "name": "Convert to Cryptocurrency", "source": "f3", "tactic": "monetization" }, { "id": "F1047", "name": "Transfer of funds", "source": "f3", "tactic": "monetization" } ] }
- nist_csf
- [ "DE.AE-02", "RS.AN-03", "ID.RA-01", "DE.CM-01" ]
- subdomain
- malware-analysis
- description
- Analyze malicious Linux ELF binaries — botnets, cryptominers, ransomware, and rootkits targeting Linux servers, containers, and cloud infrastructure — through static analysis, dynamic tracing, and reverse engineering of x86_64 and ARM samples. Use when investigating Linux malware, triaging a suspicious ELF binary, assessing a compromised Linux server, or analyzing container-targeted malware.
- mitre_attack
- [ "T1027", "T1059.004", "T1620", "T1574.006" ]
02 资源文件 3
- 许可证LICENSE11.0 KB
- 参考文档references/api-reference.md3.1 KB
- 脚本scripts/agent.py8.6 KB
03 SKILL.md 正文
Analyzing Linux ELF Malware
When to Use
- A Linux server or container has been compromised and suspicious ELF binaries are found
- Analyzing Linux botnets (Mirai, Gafgyt, XorDDoS), cryptominers, or ransomware
- Investigating malware targeting cloud infrastructure, Docker containers, or Kubernetes pods
- Reverse engineering Linux rootkits and kernel modules
- Analyzing cross-platform malware compiled for Linux x86_64, ARM, or MIPS architectures
Do not use for Windows PE binary analysis; use PEStudio, Ghidra, or IDA for Windows malware.
Prerequisites
- Ghidra or IDA with Linux ELF support for disassembly and decompilation
- Linux analysis VM (Ubuntu 22.04 recommended) with development tools installed
- strace, ltrace, and GDB for dynamic analysis and debugging
- readelf, objdump, and nm from GNU binutils for static inspection
- Radare2 for quick binary triage and scripted analysis
- Docker for isolated container-based malware execution
Workflow
Step 1: Identify ELF Binary Properties
Examine the ELF header and basic properties:
# File type identification
file suspect_binary
# Detailed ELF header analysis
readelf -h suspect_binary
# Section headers
readelf -S suspect_binary
# Program headers (segments)
readelf -l suspect_binary
# Symbol table (if not stripped)
readelf -s suspect_binary
nm suspect_binary 2>/dev/null
# Dynamic linking information
readelf -d suspect_binary
ldd suspect_binary 2>/dev/null # Only on matching architecture!
# Compute hashes
md5sum suspect_binary
sha256sum suspect_binary
# Check for packing/UPX
upx -t suspect_binary
# Python-based ELF analysis
from elftools.elf.elffile import ELFFile
import hashlib
with open("suspect_binary", "rb") as f:
data = f.read()
sha256 = hashlib.sha256(data).hexdigest()
with open("suspect_binary", "rb") as f:
elf = ELFFile(f)
print(f"SHA-256: {sha256}")
print(f"Class: {elf.elfclass}-bit")
print(f"Endian: {elf.little_endian and 'Little' or 'Big'}")
print(f"Machine: {elf.header.e_machine}")
print(f"Type: {elf.header.e_type}")
print(f"Entry Point: 0x{elf.header.e_entry:X}")
# Check if stripped
symtab = elf.get_section_by_name('.symtab')
print(f"Stripped: {'Yes' if symtab is None else 'No'}")
# Section entropy analysis
import math
from collections import Counter
for section in elf.iter_sections():
data = section.data()
if len(data) > 0:
entropy = -sum((c/len(data)) * math.log2(c/len(data))
for c in Counter(data).values() if c > 0)
if entropy > 7.0:
print(f" [!] High entropy section: {section.name} ({entropy:.2f})")
Step 2: Extract Strings and Indicators
Search for embedded IOCs and functionality clues:
# ASCII strings
strings suspect_binary > strings_output.txt
# Search for network indicators
grep -iE "(http|https|ftp)://" strings_output.txt
grep -iE "([0-9]{1,3}\.){3}[0-9]{1,3}" strings_output.txt
grep -iE "[a-zA-Z0-9.-]+\.(com|net|org|io|ru|cn)" strings_output.txt
# Search for shell commands
grep -iE "(bash|sh|wget|curl|chmod|/tmp/|/dev/)" strings_output.txt
# Search for crypto mining indicators
grep -iE "(stratum|xmr|monero|pool\.|mining)" strings_output.txt
# Search for SSH/credential theft
grep -iE "(ssh|authorized_keys|id_rsa|shadow|passwd)" strings_output.txt
# Search for persistence mechanisms
grep -iE "(crontab|systemd|init\.d|rc\.local|ld\.so\.preload)" strings_output.txt
# FLOSS for obfuscated strings (if available)
floss suspect_binary
Step 3: Analyze System Calls and Library Usage
Identify what system calls and libraries the malware uses:
# List imported functions (dynamically linked)
readelf -r suspect_binary | grep -E "socket|connect|exec|fork|open|write|bind|listen"
# Trace system calls during execution (in isolated VM only)
strace -f -e trace=network,process,file -o strace_output.txt ./suspect_binary
# Trace library calls
ltrace -f -o ltrace_output.txt ./suspect_binary
# Key system calls to watch:
# Network: socket, connect, bind, listen, accept, sendto, recvfrom
# Process: fork, execve, clone, kill, ptrace
# File: open, read, write, unlink, rename, chmod
# Persistence: inotify_add_watch (file monitoring)
Step 4: Dynamic Analysis with GDB
Debug the malware to observe runtime behavior:
# Start GDB with the binary
gdb ./suspect_binary
# Set breakpoints on key functions
(gdb) break main
(gdb) break socket
(gdb) break connect
(gdb) break execve
(gdb) break fork
# Run and analyze
(gdb) run
(gdb) info registers # View register state
(gdb) x/20s $rdi # Examine string argument
(gdb) bt # Backtrace
(gdb) continue
# For stripped binaries, break on entry point
(gdb) break *0x400580 # Entry point from readelf
(gdb) run
# Monitor network connections during execution
# In another terminal:
ss -tlnp # List listening sockets
ss -tnp # List established connections
Step 5: Reverse Engineer with Ghidra
Perform deep code analysis on the ELF binary:
Ghidra Analysis for Linux ELF:
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
1. Import: File -> Import -> Select ELF binary
- Ghidra auto-detects ELF format and architecture
- Accept default analysis options
2. Key analysis targets:
- main() function (or entry point if stripped)
- Socket creation and connection functions
- Command dispatch logic (switch/case on received data)
- Encryption/encoding routines
- Persistence installation code
- Self-propagation/scanning functions
3. For Mirai-like botnets, look for:
- Credential list for brute-forcing (telnet/SSH)
- Attack module selection (UDP flood, SYN flood, ACK flood)
- Scanner module (port scanning for vulnerable devices)
- Killer module (killing competing botnets)
4. For cryptominers, look for:
- Mining pool connection (stratum protocol)
- Wallet address strings
- CPU/GPU utilization functions
- Process hiding techniques
Step 6: Analyze Linux-Specific Persistence
Check for persistence mechanisms:
# Check for LD_PRELOAD rootkit
strings suspect_binary | grep "ld.so.preload"
# Malware writing to /etc/ld.so.preload can hook all dynamic library calls
# Check for crontab persistence
strings suspect_binary | grep -i "cron"
# Check for systemd service creation
strings suspect_binary | grep -iE "systemd|\.service|systemctl"
# Check for init script creation
strings suspect_binary | grep -iE "init\.d|rc\.local|update-rc"
# Check for SSH key injection
strings suspect_binary | grep -i "authorized_keys"
# Check for kernel module (rootkit) loading
strings suspect_binary | grep -iE "insmod|modprobe|init_module"
# Check for process hiding
strings suspect_binary | grep -iE "proc|readdir|getdents"
Key Concepts
| Term | Definition |
|---|---|
| ELF (Executable and Linkable Format) | Standard binary format for Linux executables, shared libraries, and core dumps containing headers, sections, and segments |
| Stripped Binary | ELF binary with debug symbols removed, making reverse engineering more difficult as function names are lost |
| LD_PRELOAD | Linux environment variable specifying shared libraries to load before all others; abused by rootkits to intercept system library calls |
| strace | Linux system call tracer that logs all system calls and signals made by a process, revealing file, network, and process operations |
| GOT/PLT | Global Offset Table and Procedure Linkage Table; ELF structures for dynamic linking that can be hijacked for function hooking |
| Statically Linked | Binary compiled with all library code included; common in IoT malware to run on systems without matching shared libraries |
| Mirai | Prolific Linux botnet targeting IoT devices via telnet brute-force; source code leaked, leading to many variants |
Tools & Systems
- Ghidra: NSA reverse engineering tool with full ELF support for x86, x86_64, ARM, MIPS, and other Linux architectures
- Radare2: Open-source reverse engineering framework with command-line interface for quick binary analysis and scripting
- strace: Linux system call tracing tool for observing binary behavior including file, network, and process operations
- GDB: GNU Debugger for setting breakpoints, examining memory, and stepping through Linux binary execution
- pyelftools: Python library for parsing ELF files programmatically for automated analysis pipelines
Common Scenarios
Scenario: Analyzing a Cryptominer Found on a Compromised Linux Server
Context: A cloud server shows 100% CPU usage. Investigation reveals an unknown binary running from /tmp with a suspicious name. The binary needs analysis to confirm it is a cryptominer and identify the attacker's wallet and pool.
Approach:
- Copy the binary to an analysis VM and compute SHA-256 hash
- Run
fileandreadelfto identify architecture and linking type - Extract strings and search for mining pool addresses (stratum+tcp://) and wallet addresses
- Run with strace in a sandbox to observe network connections (mining pool connection)
- Import into Ghidra to identify the mining algorithm and configuration extraction
- Check for persistence mechanisms (crontab, systemd service, SSH keys)
- Document all IOCs including pool address, wallet, C2 for updates, and persistence artifacts
Pitfalls:
- Running
lddon malware outside a sandbox (ldd can execute code in the binary) - Not checking for ARM/MIPS architecture before attempting x86_64 execution
- Missing companion scripts (.sh files) that may handle persistence and cleanup
- Ignoring the initial access vector (how the miner was deployed: SSH brute force, web exploit, container escape)
Output Format
LINUX ELF MALWARE ANALYSIS REPORT
====================================
File: /tmp/.X11-unix/.rsync
SHA-256: e3b0c44298fc1c149afbf4c8996fb924...
Type: ELF 64-bit LSB executable, x86-64
Linking: Statically linked (all libraries embedded)
Stripped: Yes
Size: 2,847,232 bytes
Packer: UPX 3.96 (unpacked for analysis)
CLASSIFICATION
Family: XMRig Cryptominer (modified)
Variant: Custom build with C2 update mechanism
FUNCTIONALITY
[*] XMR (Monero) mining via RandomX algorithm
[*] Stratum pool connection for work submission
[*] C2 check-in for configuration updates
[*] Process name masquerading (argv[0] = "[kworker/0:0]")
[*] Competitor process killing (kills other miners)
[*] SSH key injection for re-access
NETWORK INDICATORS
Mining Pool: stratum+tcp://pool.minexmr[.]com:4444
C2 Server: hxxp://update.malicious[.]com/config
Wallet: 49jZ5Q3b...Monero_Wallet_Address...
PERSISTENCE
[1] Crontab entry: */5 * * * * /tmp/.X11-unix/.rsync
[2] SSH key added to /root/.ssh/authorized_keys
[3] Systemd service: /etc/systemd/system/rsync-daemon.service
[4] Modified /etc/ld.so.preload for process hiding
PROCESS HIDING
LD_PRELOAD: /usr/lib/.libsystem.so
Hook: readdir() to hide /tmp/.X11-unix/.rsync from ls
Hook: fopen() to hide from /proc/*/maps reading
04 同仓库更多 Skills
verifying-build-provenance-with-slsa-sigstore
Verifies artifact signatures and SLSA provenance using Sigstore's cosign (verify, verify-attestation, verify-blob-attestation) and slsa-verifier (verify-artifact), enforcing keyless OIDC builder identity and source repo against SLSA Build levels. Use in CI/CD before deploying artifacts, when consuming third-party attestations, establishing a SLSA Build L3 pipeline, or confirming provenance during incident response or admission control.
validating-tpm-measured-boot-attestation
Verifies TPM 2.0 measured-boot integrity and remote attestation with tpm2-tools -- reading PCRs (tpm2_pcrread), replaying the boot event log, generating and checking signed quotes (tpm2_quote/tpm2_checkquote), and sealing secrets to a PCR policy. Use to confirm a system booted trusted firmware/kernel for Zero Trust device posture, detect boot-chain tampering via PCR drift, or build a golden-value baseline for fleet attestation.
validating-backup-integrity-for-recovery
Validates backup integrity through cryptographic hash verification, automated restore testing, corruption detection, and recoverability checks to confirm backups are reliable for disaster recovery and ransomware response. Use before relying on backups for recovery, when building post-backup validation pipelines, auditing backup infrastructure for compliance, or checking immutable/air-gapped backups for silent corruption or tampering.
triaging-windows-with-kape
Runs KAPE (Kroll Artifact Parser and Extractor) to collect targeted forensic artifacts (registry hives, $MFT, event logs, prefetch, browser data) via Targets and parse them with Modules wrapping Eric Zimmerman's EZ Tools (PECmd, MFTECmd, RECmd). Use during early incident containment/triage when full disk imaging is impractical but a defensible, parseable Windows artifact set is needed quickly, including at-scale remote collection.
triaging-vulnerabilities-with-ssvc-framework
Triages and prioritizes vulnerabilities with CISA's Stakeholder-Specific Vulnerability Categorization (SSVC) decision tree, weighing exploitation status (via the CISA KEV catalog and FIRST EPSS API), technical impact, automatability, and mission prevalence to output Track/Track*/Attend/Act decisions. Use when prioritizing vulnerability scan results (OpenVAS, Nessus, Qualys) for remediation planning beyond raw CVSS scores.
triaging-security-incident
Performs initial triage of security incidents using the NIST SP 800-61r3 and SANS PICERL frameworks, classifying incident type, assigning priority by business impact, and routing to the appropriate response team. Use when a SIEM/EDR alert needs human classification, concurrent alerts must be prioritized, or a user report or threat-intel IOC match requires initial incident categorization.