distributed-training-megatron-core
Trains large language models (2B-462B parameters) using NVIDIA Megatron-Core with advanced parallelism strategies. Use when training models >1B parameters, need maximum GPU efficiency (47% MFU on H100), or require tensor/pipeline/sequence/context/expert parallelism. Production-ready framework used for Nemotron, LLaMA, DeepSeek.
- License 许可
- MIT
- 最近更新
- 2026-11-14
- Stars
- ★ 3.3w
- Forks
- 3.9k
01 前言 Front Matter
- name
- distributed-training-megatron-core
- license
- MIT
- metadata
- { "tags": [ "Megatron-Core", "Large-Scale Training", "NVIDIA", "Tensor Parallelism", "Pipeline Parallelism", "Model Parallelism", "H100", "Distributed Training", "Production" ], "author": "Orchestra Research", "version": "1.0.0", "dependencies": [ "megatron-core", "torch", "apex", "transformer-engine" ] }
- description
- Trains large language models (2B-462B parameters) using NVIDIA Megatron-Core with advanced parallelism strategies. Use when training models >1B parameters, need maximum GPU efficiency (47% MFU on H100), or require tensor/pipeline/sequence/context/expert parallelism. Production-ready framework used for Nemotron, LLaMA, DeepSeek.
02 资源文件 5
- 参考文档agents/openai.yaml247 B
- 参考文档references/benchmarks.md7.2 KB
- 参考文档references/parallelism-guide.md9.4 KB
- 参考文档references/production-examples.md10.6 KB
- 参考文档references/training-recipes.md11.3 KB
03 SKILL.md 正文
Megatron-Core - Large-Scale LLM Training
Quick start
Megatron-Core trains LLMs from 2B to 462B parameters with up to 47% Model FLOP Utilization on H100 GPUs through advanced parallelism strategies.
Installation:
# Docker (recommended)
docker run --gpus all -it --rm nvcr.io/nvidia/pytorch:25.04-py3
# Or pip
pip install megatron-core
Simple distributed training:
# Train with 2 GPUs using data parallelism
torchrun --nproc_per_node=2 examples/run_simple_mcore_train_loop.py
# Or LLaMA-3 8B training
./examples/llama/train_llama3_8b_fp8.sh
Common workflows
Workflow 1: Train LLaMA-style model with 3D parallelism
Copy this checklist:
LLaMA Training Setup:
- [ ] Step 1: Choose parallelism configuration
- [ ] Step 2: Configure training hyperparameters
- [ ] Step 3: Launch distributed training
- [ ] Step 4: Monitor performance metrics
Step 1: Choose parallelism configuration
Model size determines parallelism strategy:
| Model Size | GPUs | Tensor Parallel | Pipeline Parallel | Data Parallel | Context Parallel |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7B | 8 | 1 | 1 | 8 | 1 |
| 13B | 8 | 2 | 1 | 4 | 1 |
| 70B | 64 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 1 |
| 405B | 128 | 8 | 8 | 2 | 2 |
Step 2: Configure training hyperparameters
#!/bin/bash
# train_llama_70b.sh
GPUS_PER_NODE=8
NNODES=8 # 64 GPUs total
TP=4 # Tensor parallel
PP=4 # Pipeline parallel
CP=1 # Context parallel
# LLaMA 70B configuration
MODEL_SIZE=70 # Billion parameters
HIDDEN_SIZE=8192
NUM_LAYERS=80
NUM_HEADS=64
SEQ_LENGTH=4096
# Training hyperparameters
MICRO_BATCH=1
GLOBAL_BATCH=1024
LR=3e-4
torchrun \
--nproc_per_node=$GPUS_PER_NODE \
--nnodes=$NNODES \
pretrain_gpt.py \
--tensor-model-parallel-size $TP \
--pipeline-model-parallel-size $PP \
--context-parallel-size $CP \
--sequence-parallel \
--num-layers $NUM_LAYERS \
--hidden-size $HIDDEN_SIZE \
--num-attention-heads $NUM_HEADS \
--seq-length $SEQ_LENGTH \
--max-position-embeddings $SEQ_LENGTH \
--micro-batch-size $MICRO_BATCH \
--global-batch-size $GLOBAL_BATCH \
--lr $LR \
--train-iters 100000 \
--lr-decay-style cosine \
--lr-warmup-iters 2000 \
--weight-decay 0.1 \
--clip-grad 1.0 \
--bf16 \
--use-mcore-models \
--transformer-impl transformer_engine \
--data-path /path/to/data \
--vocab-file /path/to/vocab.json \
--merge-file /path/to/merges.txt
Step 3: Launch distributed training
# Single node (8 GPUs)
bash train_llama_70b.sh
# Multi-node with SLURM
sbatch --nodes=8 --gpus-per-node=8 train_llama_70b.sh
Step 4: Monitor performance metrics
Key metrics to track:
Model FLOP Utilization (MFU): Target >40% on H100
Throughput: Tokens/sec/GPU
Memory usage: <80GB per GPU for 70B model
Loss: Should decrease steadily
Workflow 2: Configure Mixture of Experts (MoE) training
For sparse MoE models like Mixtral.
MoE Training:
- [ ] Step 1: Configure expert parallelism
- [ ] Step 2: Set MoE hyperparameters
- [ ] Step 3: Launch training with EP
Step 1: Configure expert parallelism
# Mixtral 8x7B example
TENSOR_PARALLEL=2
PIPELINE_PARALLEL=1
EXPERT_PARALLEL=4 # Split 8 experts across 4 GPUs
DATA_PARALLEL=4
TOTAL_GPUS=$((TENSOR_PARALLEL * PIPELINE_PARALLEL * EXPERT_PARALLEL * DATA_PARALLEL))
# = 2 * 1 * 4 * 4 = 32 GPUs
Step 2: Set MoE hyperparameters
torchrun \
--nproc_per_node=8 \
pretrain_gpt.py \
--tensor-model-parallel-size 2 \
--pipeline-model-parallel-size 1 \
--expert-model-parallel-size 4 \
--num-experts 8 \
--moe-router-topk 2 \
--moe-router-load-balancing-type aux_loss \
--moe-aux-loss-coeff 0.01 \
--hidden-size 4096 \
--num-layers 32 \
--num-attention-heads 32 \
--seq-length 4096 \
--max-position-embeddings 4096 \
--bf16 \
--use-mcore-models \
--transformer-impl transformer_engine \
--data-path /path/to/data \
--vocab-file /path/to/vocab.json \
--merge-file /path/to/merges.txt
Step 3: Launch training with EP
Expert parallelism distributes different experts across GPUs, reducing memory while maintaining capacity.
Memory without EP: 8 experts × 7B = 56GB per GPU
Memory with EP=4: 2 experts × 7B = 14GB per GPU
Savings: 75% memory reduction
Workflow 3: Optimize for maximum throughput
Achieve 47% MFU on H100.
Performance Optimization:
- [ ] Step 1: Enable Flash Attention
- [ ] Step 2: Use FP8 precision (H100)
- [ ] Step 3: Optimize micro-batch size
- [ ] Step 4: Tune parallelism degrees
Step 1: Enable optimizations
--use-mcore-models # Use Megatron Core models
--transformer-impl transformer_engine # Use Transformer Engine
--sequence-parallel # Reduce activation memory (use with TP)
Step 2: Use FP8 precision (H100 only)
--fp8-hybrid # FP8 mixed precision training
# Transformer Engine handles FP8 automatically
Result: 1.5-2x speedup on H100 vs BF16.
Step 3: Optimize micro-batch size
Find largest micro-batch that fits in memory:
# Start with 1, increase until OOM
for MBS in 1 2 4 8; do
echo "Testing micro-batch-size=$MBS"
torchrun ... --micro-batch-size $MBS
done
Typical values:
- 7B model: 4-8
- 70B model: 1-2
- 405B model: 1
Step 4: Tune parallelism degrees
Rules of thumb:
Tensor Parallel: Use ≤8 (limited by NVLink within node)
Pipeline Parallel: Use for >70B models
Context Parallel: Use for sequences >8K tokens
Data Parallel: Fill remaining GPUs
Example 405B on 128 H100s:
TP=8 (1 node)
PP=8 (across nodes)
CP=2 (long sequences)
DP=1
Total = 8 × 8 × 2 × 1 = 128 GPUs
When to use vs alternatives
Use Megatron-Core when:
- Training models >10B parameters
- Need maximum efficiency (target >40% MFU)
- Using NVIDIA GPUs (A100, H100)
- Production training at scale
- Want fine-grained parallelism control
Use alternatives instead:
- PyTorch FSDP: Models <70B, simpler API, PyTorch native
- DeepSpeed: Easier setup, good for <100B models
- HuggingFace Accelerate: Prototyping, simpler workflows
- LitGPT: Educational, single-file implementations
Common issues
Issue: Low GPU utilization (<30% MFU)
Causes:
- Micro-batch too small
- Too much parallelism overhead
- Not using Flash Attention
Fixes:
# Increase micro-batch
--micro-batch-size 4 # Was 1
# Enable optimizations
--use-flash-attn
--sequence-parallel
# Reduce TP if >8
--tensor-model-parallel-size 4 # Was 16
Issue: Out of memory
Reduce memory with:
--tensor-model-parallel-size 2 # Split model across GPUs
--recompute-granularity full # Gradient checkpointing
--recompute-method block # Checkpoint transformer blocks
--recompute-num-layers 1 # Checkpoint every layer
Or use CPU/NVMe offloading:
--cpu-optimizer # Offload optimizer to CPU
--cpu-optimizer-type ADAM # CPU Adam variant
Issue: Training slower than expected
Check:
- Network bottleneck: Ensure InfiniBand/NVLink enabled
- Pipeline bubbles: Use interleaved pipeline schedule
--num-layers-per-virtual-pipeline-stage 2 - Data loading: Use fast data loader
--dataloader-type cyclic
Issue: Diverging loss
Stabilize training:
--lr-warmup-iters 2000 # Longer warmup
--clip-grad 1.0 # Gradient clipping
--init-method-std 0.006 # Smaller init
--attention-dropout 0.0 # No dropout in attention
--hidden-dropout 0.0 # No dropout in FFN
Advanced topics
Parallelism strategies: See references/parallelism-guide.md for detailed comparison of TP/PP/DP/CP/EP with performance analysis and when to use each.
Performance benchmarks: See references/benchmarks.md for MFU numbers across different model sizes and GPU configurations.
Production configurations: See references/production-examples.md for real-world setups from LLaMA 3 405B, Nemotron-4 340B, and DeepSeek-V3 671B.
Training recipes: See references/training-recipes.md for complete hyperparameter configurations for GPT/LLaMA/Mixtral architectures.
Hardware requirements
- GPU: NVIDIA Ampere+ (A100, H100, B200)
- Turing works but slower
- FP8 requires Hopper/Ada/Blackwell
- Network: InfiniBand or 400Gb+ Ethernet for multi-node
- Memory per GPU:
- 7B model: 40GB+
- 70B model: 80GB (with TP=4)
- 405B model: 80GB (with TP=8, PP=8)
- Storage: Fast NVMe for checkpoints (1TB+ for 70B+ models)
Resources
- Docs: https://docs.nvidia.com/megatron-core/
- GitHub: https://github.com/NVIDIA/Megatron-LM
- Papers:
- "Megatron-LM: Training Multi-Billion Parameter Language Models Using Model Parallelism" (2019)
- "Efficient Large-Scale Language Model Training on GPU Clusters Using Megatron-LM" (2021)
- NeMo Framework: https://docs.nvidia.com/nemo-framework/ (built on Megatron-Core)
04 同仓库更多 Skills
wealthville-pool-scoring
Score DeFi liquidity pools before providing liquidity. Returns a 0-100 pool score and an Enter/Hold/Exit/Reduce/Avoid verdict with calibrated confidence for ~68,800 Solana pools and 575 EVM pools, plus a public miss-inclusive track record. Use when asked whether a pool is worth LPing into, which pools look best right now, or how accurate the scores have actually been.
technical-debt-auditor
Scans a codebase and produces a quantified technical debt report with a prioritized remediation plan. Analyzes dead code, TODO/FIXME/HACK markers, dependency staleness, complexity hotspots, code duplication signals, test coverage gaps, unused exports, and outdated patterns. Use this skill when the user asks to audit their codebase for tech debt, wants a health check of their code quality, says things like "where should I focus refactoring", "find code smells", "audit my codebase", "what technical debt do we have", "prioritize cleanup work", or asks about code quality metrics. Also trigger when the user mentions "code rot", "legacy cleanup", "refactoring priorities", or wants to understand the overall health of a project before a major effort. Trigger even if the user doesn't say "technical debt" explicitly — any request to systematically assess code quality and identify improvement priorities belongs here.
readonly-sql-guard
Make an agent's database access provably read-only. Use when an agent runs caller-supplied SQL against a production/ERP/analytics database (a "query" MCP tool, text-to-SQL, an admin console), or when reviewing DB-access code for write/DDL/side-effect/transaction-escape risks. Checks what a statement CALLS, not just its shape.
web-artifacts-builder
Suite of tools for creating elaborate, multi-component claude.ai HTML artifacts using modern frontend web technologies (React, Tailwind CSS, shadcn/ui). Use for complex artifacts requiring state management, routing, or shadcn/ui components - not for simple single-file HTML/JSX artifacts.
webapp-testing
Toolkit for interacting with and testing local web applications using Playwright. Supports verifying frontend functionality, debugging UI behavior, capturing browser screenshots, and viewing browser logs.
discernment-nudge
After you give a substantive answer or draft that the user may act on — advice or recommendations, drafted artifacts such as goals, plans, pitches, proposals, or emails, estimates or projections, analysis or interpretation of data, factual claims they may rely on, or a multi-step argument — invoke this skill BEFORE finalizing your reply and then, if it applies, append 2-3 short follow-up questions, each tied to something specific in what you just produced, that help the user check key facts, probe the reasoning or assumptions, and notice missing context. Do this at most once per conversation. Skip it when the user asked a trivial how-to or simple lookup, wants a purely educational explanation, asked you only to format, convert, or assemble a file from content they provided, is writing code they will run, is doing creative writing or casual chat, or already asked you to double-check, cite, or review — the skill file explains these boundaries and the exact output format.