[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"skill:01M6ADMT4QXDDZ3VN191TBRM5P":3,"skill-same:01M6ADMT4QXDDZ3VN191TBRM5P":86},{"skillNo":4,"name":5,"nameZh":6,"description":7,"descriptionZh":6,"repositoryFullName":8,"ownerLogin":9,"ownerAvatarUrl":10,"ownerAccountNo":11,"ownerDisplayName":12,"repositoryNo":13,"starsCount":14,"licenseSpdxId":15,"licenseFileUrl":6,"sourceHtmlUrl":16,"categories":17,"keywords":26,"publishedAt":39,"linkOnly":40,"markdownContent":41,"markdownBody":42,"frontMatter":43,"refName":44,"commitSha":45,"skillDirectory":46,"forksCount":47,"repositoryHtmlUrl":48,"repositoryHomepageUrl":49,"ownerHtmlUrl":50,"ownerBlogUrl":51,"ownerDescription":52,"updatedAt":53,"install":54,"resources":67},"01M6ADMT4QXDDZ3VN191TBRM5P","github-actions-efficiency",null,"Audit GitHub Actions workflow efficiency and recommend fixes to reduce CI minutes and costs.","github\u002Fawesome-copilot","github","https:\u002F\u002Favatars.githubusercontent.com\u002Fu\u002F9919?v=4","01M6AC83DS133TPXFSP1DHNCC6","GitHub","01M6AD3PBDYPK7NVFJNJ66Y8RS",41081,"MIT","https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002Fgithub\u002Fawesome-copilot\u002Fblob\u002Fmain\u002Fskills\u002Fgithub-actions-efficiency\u002FSKILL.md",[18,23],{"categoryNo":19,"categoryName":20,"taxonomyType":21,"taxonomyTypeDesc":22},"01JBSEEDCAT000000000000011","运维与部署","SCENARIO","使用场景",{"categoryNo":24,"categoryName":25,"taxonomyType":21,"taxonomyTypeDesc":22},"01JBSEEDCAT000000000000023","Skill与智能体开发",[9,27,28,29,30,31,32,33,34,35,36,37,38],"actions","github actions","github actions efficiency","efficiency","workflow","audit","ci","minutes","github actions workflow","reduce","recommend","fixes","2026-11-10 10:12:30",false,"---\nname: github-actions-efficiency\ndescription: 'Audit GitHub Actions workflow efficiency and recommend fixes to reduce CI minutes and costs.'\n---\n\n# GitHub Actions Efficiency\n\nUse this skill as a lean entrypoint for GitHub Actions efficiency work. Inspect the repo, identify the waste source, and load only the reference material needed for the current task.\n\nIf no workflows exist yet, load [`references\u002Factions.md`](.\u002Freferences\u002Factions.md) and define a baseline before proceeding with the steps below.\n\n**If shell or `gh` CLI access is unavailable:** ask the user to paste `.github\u002Fworkflows\u002F` contents and `gh run list --limit 10` output. If only partial files are provided, note it: \"Audit based on provided files only; some insights may be incomplete.\" Begin responses from files alone with: \"**Static-only analysis** (not confirmed with live runs).\"\n\n## Use This Skill When\n\n- The user wants to reduce GitHub Actions runtime, CI cost, or wasted workflow runs.\n- The repo has existing workflows in `.github\u002Fworkflows\u002F` or explicit GitHub Actions configuration questions.\n- The user asks for caching, concurrency, path filters, matrix reduction, job optimization, or workflow-specific fixes.\n- The user needs help creating a new GitHub Actions workflow or CI baseline from scratch.\n\n## Load Only What You Need\n\n- [`references\u002Factions.md`](.\u002Freferences\u002Factions.md) — audits, job gating, matrix reduction, live validation, and workflow-specific fixes.\n- [`references\u002Freporting.md`](.\u002Freferences\u002Freporting.md) — when the user asks for a before\u002Fafter efficiency report.\n- [`references\u002Fpatterns.md`](.\u002Freferences\u002Fpatterns.md) — full YAML examples when inline audit commands are not enough.\n\n## Core Workflow\n\n### 1. Measure first\n\n```bash\nrg -n \"on:|concurrency:|paths:|paths-ignore:|strategy:|matrix:|cache:\" .github\u002Fworkflows\ngh run list --limit 10\nrun_id=$(gh run list --limit 1 --json databaseId --jq '.[0].databaseId')\ngh run view \"$run_id\" --log-failed\n```\n\nLook for: missing dependency caches, missing `concurrency` cancellation, over-broad triggers, duplicate workflow coverage, and expensive jobs that run on every change regardless of scope.\n\n### 2. Apply guardrails\n\nCheck each proposed fix against these rules before recommending it:\n\n1. Does not hide required validation — drop any fix that removes release, schema, migration, or shared-library checks.\n2. Does not reduce parallelism without justification — drop unless the user prioritised cost over latency *and* the new critical path stays within 1.25× the original.\n3. Preserves only documented matrix legs — drop matrix legs with no explicit version or platform commitment.\n4. Write-back jobs use opt-in triggers — flag (do not drop) formatter or bot jobs that run automatically; recommend an opt-in trigger instead.\n5. Repo changes stay separate from org settings — split any fix that mixes repo-editable YAML with org-level or GitHub-account settings into two distinct recommendations.\n\n### 3. Select the top 3 fixes\n\nFrom the six candidates below, keep only those supported by audit evidence from step 1 *and* passing all guardrails from step 2. Rank survivors by estimated daily CI minutes saved (per-run savings × runs per day). Select all candidates that meet both criteria, up to a maximum of 3.\n\n1. Add dependency caching with lockfile-based keys\n2. Add or correct `concurrency` cancellation\n3. Remove duplicate workflow coverage before merging jobs\n4. Narrow workflow or job triggers safely\n5. Reduce matrix breadth to match risk and event type\n6. Parallelize independent jobs on the critical path\n\n### 4. Verify\n\n- If `gh` CLI access is available, validate path-gating and concurrency cancellation with a live test push on a non-protected branch.\n- If live validation is not possible, state that explicitly in the output.\n- Treat unexpected live behavior as a real bug even when the YAML looks correct.\n\n## Required Output\n\n1. **Waste sources** — top cost or latency drivers found in step 1\n2. **Proposed fixes** — top 3 (or all remaining) with supporting audit evidence\n3. **Validation** — what was proven live, what was checked locally only, and any remaining risk\n4. **Impact** — expected savings vs. measured savings; separate PR wall-clock time from total runner time\n\n## References\n\n- [`references\u002Factions.md`](.\u002Freferences\u002Factions.md)\n- [`references\u002Freporting.md`](.\u002Freferences\u002Freporting.md)\n- [`references\u002Fpatterns.md`](.\u002Freferences\u002Fpatterns.md)\n- [`references\u002Freview-rubric.md`](.\u002Freferences\u002Freview-rubric.md) — load when reviewing completed efficiency work\n","# GitHub Actions Efficiency\n\nUse this skill as a lean entrypoint for GitHub Actions efficiency work. Inspect the repo, identify the waste source, and load only the reference material needed for the current task.\n\nIf no workflows exist yet, load [`references\u002Factions.md`](.\u002Freferences\u002Factions.md) and define a baseline before proceeding with the steps below.\n\n**If shell or `gh` CLI access is unavailable:** ask the user to paste `.github\u002Fworkflows\u002F` contents and `gh run list --limit 10` output. If only partial files are provided, note it: \"Audit based on provided files only; some insights may be incomplete.\" Begin responses from files alone with: \"**Static-only analysis** (not confirmed with live runs).\"\n\n## Use This Skill When\n\n- The user wants to reduce GitHub Actions runtime, CI cost, or wasted workflow runs.\n- The repo has existing workflows in `.github\u002Fworkflows\u002F` or explicit GitHub Actions configuration questions.\n- The user asks for caching, concurrency, path filters, matrix reduction, job optimization, or workflow-specific fixes.\n- The user needs help creating a new GitHub Actions workflow or CI baseline from scratch.\n\n## Load Only What You Need\n\n- [`references\u002Factions.md`](.\u002Freferences\u002Factions.md) — audits, job gating, matrix reduction, live validation, and workflow-specific fixes.\n- [`references\u002Freporting.md`](.\u002Freferences\u002Freporting.md) — when the user asks for a before\u002Fafter efficiency report.\n- [`references\u002Fpatterns.md`](.\u002Freferences\u002Fpatterns.md) — full YAML examples when inline audit commands are not enough.\n\n## Core Workflow\n\n### 1. Measure first\n\n```bash\nrg -n \"on:|concurrency:|paths:|paths-ignore:|strategy:|matrix:|cache:\" .github\u002Fworkflows\ngh run list --limit 10\nrun_id=$(gh run list --limit 1 --json databaseId --jq '.[0].databaseId')\ngh run view \"$run_id\" --log-failed\n```\n\nLook for: missing dependency caches, missing `concurrency` cancellation, over-broad triggers, duplicate workflow coverage, and expensive jobs that run on every change regardless of scope.\n\n### 2. Apply guardrails\n\nCheck each proposed fix against these rules before recommending it:\n\n1. Does not hide required validation — drop any fix that removes release, schema, migration, or shared-library checks.\n2. Does not reduce parallelism without justification — drop unless the user prioritised cost over latency *and* the new critical path stays within 1.25× the original.\n3. Preserves only documented matrix legs — drop matrix legs with no explicit version or platform commitment.\n4. Write-back jobs use opt-in triggers — flag (do not drop) formatter or bot jobs that run automatically; recommend an opt-in trigger instead.\n5. Repo changes stay separate from org settings — split any fix that mixes repo-editable YAML with org-level or GitHub-account settings into two distinct recommendations.\n\n### 3. Select the top 3 fixes\n\nFrom the six candidates below, keep only those supported by audit evidence from step 1 *and* passing all guardrails from step 2. Rank survivors by estimated daily CI minutes saved (per-run savings × runs per day). Select all candidates that meet both criteria, up to a maximum of 3.\n\n1. Add dependency caching with lockfile-based keys\n2. Add or correct `concurrency` cancellation\n3. Remove duplicate workflow coverage before merging jobs\n4. Narrow workflow or job triggers safely\n5. Reduce matrix breadth to match risk and event type\n6. Parallelize independent jobs on the critical path\n\n### 4. Verify\n\n- If `gh` CLI access is available, validate path-gating and concurrency cancellation with a live test push on a non-protected branch.\n- If live validation is not possible, state that explicitly in the output.\n- Treat unexpected live behavior as a real bug even when the YAML looks correct.\n\n## Required Output\n\n1. **Waste sources** — top cost or latency drivers found in step 1\n2. **Proposed fixes** — top 3 (or all remaining) with supporting audit evidence\n3. **Validation** — what was proven live, what was checked locally only, and any remaining risk\n4. **Impact** — expected savings vs. measured savings; separate PR wall-clock time from total runner time\n\n## References\n\n- [`references\u002Factions.md`](.\u002Freferences\u002Factions.md)\n- [`references\u002Freporting.md`](.\u002Freferences\u002Freporting.md)\n- [`references\u002Fpatterns.md`](.\u002Freferences\u002Fpatterns.md)\n- [`references\u002Freview-rubric.md`](.\u002Freferences\u002Freview-rubric.md) — load when reviewing completed efficiency work\n",{"name":5,"description":7},"main","5269f7ea2d6c3a9bfda5ed878b6726cf509121fd","skills\u002Fgithub-actions-efficiency",5344,"https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002Fgithub\u002Fawesome-copilot","https:\u002F\u002Fawesome-copilot.github.com\u002F","https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002Fgithub","https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002Fabout","How people build software.","2026-11-13 02:05:36",{"source":8,"skillName":5,"commands":55,"prompt":65,"zipAvailable":66},[56,59,62],{"tool":57,"command":58},"npx","npx skills add github\u002Fawesome-copilot --skill github-actions-efficiency",{"tool":60,"command":61},"bunx","bunx skills add github\u002Fawesome-copilot --skill github-actions-efficiency",{"tool":63,"command":64},"pnpm","pnpm dlx skills add github\u002Fawesome-copilot --skill github-actions-efficiency","安装技能，技能地址：https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002Fgithub\u002Fawesome-copilot\u002Fblob\u002Fmain\u002Fskills\u002Fgithub-actions-efficiency\u002FSKILL.md",true,[68,74,78,82],{"path":69,"resourceType":70,"resourceTypeDesc":71,"sizeBytes":72,"sourceHtmlUrl":73},"references\u002Factions.md","REFERENCE","参考文档",3201,"https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002Fgithub\u002Fawesome-copilot\u002Fblob\u002Fmain\u002Fskills\u002Fgithub-actions-efficiency\u002Freferences\u002Factions.md",{"path":75,"resourceType":70,"resourceTypeDesc":71,"sizeBytes":76,"sourceHtmlUrl":77},"references\u002Fpatterns.md",1298,"https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002Fgithub\u002Fawesome-copilot\u002Fblob\u002Fmain\u002Fskills\u002Fgithub-actions-efficiency\u002Freferences\u002Fpatterns.md",{"path":79,"resourceType":70,"resourceTypeDesc":71,"sizeBytes":80,"sourceHtmlUrl":81},"references\u002Freporting.md",1568,"https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002Fgithub\u002Fawesome-copilot\u002Fblob\u002Fmain\u002Fskills\u002Fgithub-actions-efficiency\u002Freferences\u002Freporting.md",{"path":83,"resourceType":70,"resourceTypeDesc":71,"sizeBytes":84,"sourceHtmlUrl":85},"references\u002Freview-rubric.md",465,"https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002Fgithub\u002Fawesome-copilot\u002Fblob\u002Fmain\u002Fskills\u002Fgithub-actions-efficiency\u002Freferences\u002Freview-rubric.md",[87,118,145,175,209,226],{"skillNo":88,"name":89,"nameZh":6,"description":90,"descriptionZh":6,"repositoryFullName":8,"ownerLogin":9,"ownerAvatarUrl":10,"ownerAccountNo":11,"ownerDisplayName":12,"repositoryNo":13,"starsCount":14,"licenseSpdxId":15,"licenseFileUrl":6,"sourceHtmlUrl":91,"categories":92,"keywords":97,"publishedAt":39},"01M70KXZNX9ES38N2A8M58ZZMZ","supabase-rls-policies","Write, review, and test Supabase Row Level Security (RLS) policies so that one user cannot read or change another user's rows. Use when creating or changing tables, policies, views, or security definer functions in a Supabase project, when reviewing a migration that touches RLS, or when asked to prove user isolation with pgTAP tests that sign in as two users.","https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002Fgithub\u002Fawesome-copilot\u002Fblob\u002Fmain\u002Fskills\u002Fsupabase-rls-policies\u002FSKILL.md",[93,96],{"categoryNo":94,"categoryName":95,"taxonomyType":21,"taxonomyTypeDesc":22},"01JBSEEDCAT000000000000008","测试与质量",{"categoryNo":24,"categoryName":25,"taxonomyType":21,"taxonomyTypeDesc":22},[98,99,100,101,102,103,104,105,106,107,108,109,110,111,112,113,114,115,116,117],"supabase","rls","supabase rls","supabase rls policies","project","when","review","change","read","write","security","isolation","tables","as","tests","prove","use","users","functions","with",{"skillNo":119,"name":120,"nameZh":6,"description":121,"descriptionZh":6,"repositoryFullName":8,"ownerLogin":9,"ownerAvatarUrl":10,"ownerAccountNo":11,"ownerDisplayName":12,"repositoryNo":13,"starsCount":14,"licenseSpdxId":15,"licenseFileUrl":6,"sourceHtmlUrl":122,"categories":123,"keywords":125,"publishedAt":39},"01M70KWA5YWXDV6V8DZ19E3T2Y","skill-distribution-audit","Audit a skill collection before release or investigate installer omissions, archived\u002Ftemplate leakage, duplicate identities, and manifest drift. Reconcile the intended public source set, distribution manifest, and actual discovery output for a specified consumer version. Includes a deterministic set-comparison helper.","https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002Fgithub\u002Fawesome-copilot\u002Fblob\u002Fmain\u002Fskills\u002Fskill-distribution-audit\u002FSKILL.md",[124],{"categoryNo":24,"categoryName":25,"taxonomyType":21,"taxonomyTypeDesc":22},[126,127,32,128,129,130,131,132,133,134,135,136,137,138,139,140,141,142,143,144],"distribution","skill distribution audit","SET","deterministic","installer","for","discovery","comparison","helper","manifest","version","collection","drift","output","investigate","duplicate","template","release","reconcile",{"skillNo":146,"name":147,"nameZh":6,"description":148,"descriptionZh":6,"repositoryFullName":8,"ownerLogin":9,"ownerAvatarUrl":10,"ownerAccountNo":11,"ownerDisplayName":12,"repositoryNo":13,"starsCount":14,"licenseSpdxId":15,"licenseFileUrl":149,"sourceHtmlUrl":150,"categories":151,"keywords":157,"publishedAt":39},"01M70KCJPFVW7PPQ49CC5R8JGK","logicapps-custom-code-net10-migration","Migrate Azure Logic Apps Standard local-function custom-code projects from .NET 8 to .NET 10. Use for legacy Logic Apps custom-code workspace upgrades, project\u002Fpackage configuration, custom-worker settings, publication, and integrated VS Code debugging. Not for ordinary .NET applications, standalone Azure Functions, Consumption workflows, or cloud deployment.","https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002Fgithub\u002Fawesome-copilot\u002Fblob\u002Fmain\u002Fskills\u002Flogicapps-custom-code-net10-migration\u002FLICENSE","https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002Fgithub\u002Fawesome-copilot\u002Fblob\u002Fmain\u002Fskills\u002Flogicapps-custom-code-net10-migration\u002FSKILL.md",[152],{"categoryNo":153,"categoryName":154,"taxonomyType":155,"taxonomyTypeDesc":156},"01JBSEEDCAT000000000000030","开发工程师","PROFESSION","适用职业",[158,159,160,161,162,163,131,102,164,165,166,167,168,169,170,114,171,172,173,174],"custom","code","logicapps custom code net10 migration","migration","projects","standalone","deployment","applications","local","azure","worker","upgrades","package","apps","Legacy","debugging","workflows",{"skillNo":176,"name":177,"nameZh":6,"description":178,"descriptionZh":6,"repositoryFullName":8,"ownerLogin":9,"ownerAvatarUrl":10,"ownerAccountNo":11,"ownerDisplayName":12,"repositoryNo":13,"starsCount":14,"licenseSpdxId":15,"licenseFileUrl":179,"sourceHtmlUrl":180,"categories":181,"keywords":186,"publishedAt":39},"01M6AEBN37RQMXJ3298PEY7PG1","winmd-api-search","Find and explore Windows desktop APIs. Use when building features that need platform capabilities — camera, file access, notifications, UI controls, AI\u002FML, sensors, networking, etc. Discovers the right API for a task and retrieves full type details (methods, properties, events, enumeration values).","https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002Fgithub\u002Fawesome-copilot\u002Fblob\u002Fmain\u002Fskills\u002Fwinmd-api-search\u002FLICENSE.txt","https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002Fgithub\u002Fawesome-copilot\u002Fblob\u002Fmain\u002Fskills\u002Fwinmd-api-search\u002FSKILL.md",[182,185],{"categoryNo":183,"categoryName":184,"taxonomyType":21,"taxonomyTypeDesc":22},"01JBSEEDCAT000000000000010","后端与接口",{"categoryNo":153,"categoryName":154,"taxonomyType":155,"taxonomyTypeDesc":156},[187,188,189,190,191,192,193,194,195,196,197,198,199,200,201,103,202,203,204,205,206,131,207,208],"winmd api search","search","api","windows","desktop","file access","enumeration","ui","ml","file","networking","capabilities","notifications","explore","access","features","full","camera","events","platform","methods","controls",{"skillNo":210,"name":211,"nameZh":6,"description":212,"descriptionZh":6,"repositoryFullName":8,"ownerLogin":9,"ownerAvatarUrl":10,"ownerAccountNo":11,"ownerDisplayName":12,"repositoryNo":13,"starsCount":14,"licenseSpdxId":213,"licenseFileUrl":214,"sourceHtmlUrl":215,"categories":216,"keywords":222,"publishedAt":39},"01M6AE571R3SC1ZGE202B3NB5S","resemble-detect","Deepfake detection and media safety — detect AI-generated audio, images, video, and text, trace synthesis sources, apply watermarks, verify speaker identity, and analyze media intelligence using Resemble AI","Apache-2.0","https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002Fgithub\u002Fawesome-copilot\u002Fblob\u002Fmain\u002Fskills\u002Fresemble-detect\u002FLICENSE","https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002Fgithub\u002Fawesome-copilot\u002Fblob\u002Fmain\u002Fskills\u002Fresemble-detect\u002FSKILL.md",[217,218,221],{"categoryNo":183,"categoryName":184,"taxonomyType":21,"taxonomyTypeDesc":22},{"categoryNo":219,"categoryName":220,"taxonomyType":21,"taxonomyTypeDesc":22},"01JBSEEDCAT000000000000016","图像与多媒体",{"categoryNo":24,"categoryName":25,"taxonomyType":21,"taxonomyTypeDesc":22},[223,128,196,224,225],"resemble detect","https","identity",{"skillNo":227,"name":228,"nameZh":6,"description":229,"descriptionZh":6,"repositoryFullName":8,"ownerLogin":9,"ownerAvatarUrl":10,"ownerAccountNo":11,"ownerDisplayName":12,"repositoryNo":13,"starsCount":14,"licenseSpdxId":213,"licenseFileUrl":230,"sourceHtmlUrl":231,"categories":232,"keywords":237,"publishedAt":39},"01M6AE30BSK2HCY4TQQ22Z8JRD","quality-playbook","Run a complete quality engineering audit on any codebase. Derives behavioral requirements from the code, generates spec-traced functional tests, runs a three-pass code review with regression tests, executes a multi-model spec audit (Council of Three), and produces a consolidated bug report with TDD-verified patches. Finds the 35% of real defects that structural code review alone cannot catch. Works with any language. Trigger on 'quality playbook', 'spec audit', 'Council of Three', 'fitness-to-purpose', or 'coverage theater'.","https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002Fgithub\u002Fawesome-copilot\u002Fblob\u002Fmain\u002Fskills\u002Fquality-playbook\u002FLICENSE.txt","https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002Fgithub\u002Fawesome-copilot\u002Fblob\u002Fmain\u002Fskills\u002Fquality-playbook\u002FSKILL.md",[233,236],{"categoryNo":234,"categoryName":235,"taxonomyType":21,"taxonomyTypeDesc":22},"01JBSEEDCAT000000000000007","代码审查",{"categoryNo":24,"categoryName":25,"taxonomyType":21,"taxonomyTypeDesc":22},[238,239,240,241,159,104,9,32,242,243,224,244,245,246,247,248,249,250,251,252,253,254,112,255,256,257,258],"playbook","quality playbook","quality","code review","tdd","run","report","spec","bug report","council","engineering","functional","spec audit","bug","verified","multi-model","three","coverage","model","regression","structural"]