data-processing-nemo-curator
GPU-accelerated data curation for LLM training. Supports text/image/video/audio. Features fuzzy deduplication (16× faster), quality filtering (30+ heuristics), semantic deduplication, PII redaction, NSFW detection. Scales across GPUs with RAPIDS. Use for preparing high-quality training datasets, cleaning web data, or deduplicating large corpora.
- License 许可
- MIT
- 最近更新
- 2026-11-14
- Stars
- ★ 3.3w
- Forks
- 3.9k
01 前言 Front Matter
- name
- data-processing-nemo-curator
- license
- MIT
- metadata
- { "tags": [ "Data Processing", "NeMo Curator", "Data Curation", "GPU Acceleration", "Deduplication", "Quality Filtering", "NVIDIA", "RAPIDS", "PII Redaction", "Multimodal", "LLM Training Data" ], "author": "Orchestra Research", "version": "1.0.0", "dependencies": [ "nemo-curator", "cudf", "dask", "rapids" ] }
- description
- GPU-accelerated data curation for LLM training. Supports text/image/video/audio. Features fuzzy deduplication (16× faster), quality filtering (30+ heuristics), semantic deduplication, PII redaction, NSFW detection. Scales across GPUs with RAPIDS. Use for preparing high-quality training datasets, cleaning web data, or deduplicating large corpora.
02 资源文件 6
- 参考文档references/deduplication.md2.1 KB
- 参考文档references/filtering.md2.3 KB
- 参考文档sections/manifest.json676 B
- 参考文档sections/proposal-and-preview.md20.9 KB
- 其他sections/proposal-and-preview.md.tmpl16.0 KB
- 其他SKILL.md.tmpl9.3 KB
03 SKILL.md 正文
NeMo Curator - GPU-Accelerated Data Curation
NVIDIA's toolkit for preparing high-quality training data for LLMs.
When to use NeMo Curator
Use NeMo Curator when:
- Preparing LLM training data from web scrapes (Common Crawl)
- Need fast deduplication (16× faster than CPU)
- Curating multi-modal datasets (text, images, video, audio)
- Filtering low-quality or toxic content
- Scaling data processing across GPU cluster
Performance:
- 16× faster fuzzy deduplication (8TB RedPajama v2)
- 40% lower TCO vs CPU alternatives
- Near-linear scaling across GPU nodes
Use alternatives instead:
- datatrove: CPU-based, open-source data processing
- dolma: Allen AI's data toolkit
- Ray Data: General ML data processing (no curation focus)
Quick start
Installation
# Text curation (CUDA 12)
uv pip install "nemo-curator[text_cuda12]"
# All modalities
uv pip install "nemo-curator[all_cuda12]"
# CPU-only (slower)
uv pip install "nemo-curator[cpu]"
Basic text curation pipeline
from nemo_curator import ScoreFilter, Modify
from nemo_curator.datasets import DocumentDataset
import pandas as pd
# Load data
df = pd.DataFrame({"text": ["Good document", "Bad doc", "Excellent text"]})
dataset = DocumentDataset(df)
# Quality filtering
def quality_score(doc):
return len(doc["text"].split()) > 5 # Filter short docs
filtered = ScoreFilter(quality_score)(dataset)
# Deduplication
from nemo_curator.modules import ExactDuplicates
deduped = ExactDuplicates()(filtered)
# Save
deduped.to_parquet("curated_data/")
Data curation pipeline
Stage 1: Quality filtering
from nemo_curator.filters import (
WordCountFilter,
RepeatedLinesFilter,
UrlRatioFilter,
NonAlphaNumericFilter
)
# Apply 30+ heuristic filters
from nemo_curator import ScoreFilter
# Word count filter
dataset = dataset.filter(WordCountFilter(min_words=50, max_words=100000))
# Remove repetitive content
dataset = dataset.filter(RepeatedLinesFilter(max_repeated_line_fraction=0.3))
# URL ratio filter
dataset = dataset.filter(UrlRatioFilter(max_url_ratio=0.2))
Stage 2: Deduplication
Exact deduplication:
from nemo_curator.modules import ExactDuplicates
# Remove exact duplicates
deduped = ExactDuplicates(id_field="id", text_field="text")(dataset)
Fuzzy deduplication (16× faster on GPU):
from nemo_curator.modules import FuzzyDuplicates
# MinHash + LSH deduplication
fuzzy_dedup = FuzzyDuplicates(
id_field="id",
text_field="text",
num_hashes=260, # MinHash parameters
num_buckets=20,
hash_method="md5"
)
deduped = fuzzy_dedup(dataset)
Semantic deduplication:
from nemo_curator.modules import SemanticDuplicates
# Embedding-based deduplication
semantic_dedup = SemanticDuplicates(
id_field="id",
text_field="text",
embedding_model="sentence-transformers/all-MiniLM-L6-v2",
threshold=0.8 # Cosine similarity threshold
)
deduped = semantic_dedup(dataset)
Stage 3: PII redaction
from nemo_curator.modules import Modify
from nemo_curator.modifiers import PIIRedactor
# Redact personally identifiable information
pii_redactor = PIIRedactor(
supported_entities=["EMAIL_ADDRESS", "PHONE_NUMBER", "PERSON", "LOCATION"],
anonymize_action="replace" # or "redact"
)
redacted = Modify(pii_redactor)(dataset)
Stage 4: Classifier filtering
from nemo_curator.classifiers import QualityClassifier
# Quality classification
quality_clf = QualityClassifier(
model_path="nvidia/quality-classifier-deberta",
batch_size=256,
device="cuda"
)
# Filter low-quality documents
high_quality = dataset.filter(lambda doc: quality_clf(doc["text"]) > 0.5)
GPU acceleration
GPU vs CPU performance
| Operation | CPU (16 cores) | GPU (A100) | Speedup |
|---|---|---|---|
| Fuzzy dedup (8TB) | 120 hours | 7.5 hours | 16× |
| Exact dedup (1TB) | 8 hours | 0.5 hours | 16× |
| Quality filtering | 2 hours | 0.2 hours | 10× |
Multi-GPU scaling
from nemo_curator import get_client
import dask_cuda
# Initialize GPU cluster
client = get_client(cluster_type="gpu", n_workers=8)
# Process with 8 GPUs
deduped = FuzzyDuplicates(...)(dataset)
Multi-modal curation
Image curation
from nemo_curator.image import (
AestheticFilter,
NSFWFilter,
CLIPEmbedder
)
# Aesthetic scoring
aesthetic_filter = AestheticFilter(threshold=5.0)
filtered_images = aesthetic_filter(image_dataset)
# NSFW detection
nsfw_filter = NSFWFilter(threshold=0.9)
safe_images = nsfw_filter(filtered_images)
# Generate CLIP embeddings
clip_embedder = CLIPEmbedder(model="openai/clip-vit-base-patch32")
image_embeddings = clip_embedder(safe_images)
Video curation
from nemo_curator.video import (
SceneDetector,
ClipExtractor,
InternVideo2Embedder
)
# Detect scenes
scene_detector = SceneDetector(threshold=27.0)
scenes = scene_detector(video_dataset)
# Extract clips
clip_extractor = ClipExtractor(min_duration=2.0, max_duration=10.0)
clips = clip_extractor(scenes)
# Generate embeddings
video_embedder = InternVideo2Embedder()
video_embeddings = video_embedder(clips)
Audio curation
from nemo_curator.audio import (
ASRInference,
WERFilter,
DurationFilter
)
# ASR transcription
asr = ASRInference(model="nvidia/stt_en_fastconformer_hybrid_large_pc")
transcribed = asr(audio_dataset)
# Filter by WER (word error rate)
wer_filter = WERFilter(max_wer=0.3)
high_quality_audio = wer_filter(transcribed)
# Duration filtering
duration_filter = DurationFilter(min_duration=1.0, max_duration=30.0)
filtered_audio = duration_filter(high_quality_audio)
Common patterns
Web scrape curation (Common Crawl)
from nemo_curator import ScoreFilter, Modify
from nemo_curator.filters import *
from nemo_curator.modules import *
from nemo_curator.datasets import DocumentDataset
# Load Common Crawl data
dataset = DocumentDataset.read_parquet("common_crawl/*.parquet")
# Pipeline
pipeline = [
# 1. Quality filtering
WordCountFilter(min_words=100, max_words=50000),
RepeatedLinesFilter(max_repeated_line_fraction=0.2),
SymbolToWordRatioFilter(max_symbol_to_word_ratio=0.3),
UrlRatioFilter(max_url_ratio=0.3),
# 2. Language filtering
LanguageIdentificationFilter(target_languages=["en"]),
# 3. Deduplication
ExactDuplicates(id_field="id", text_field="text"),
FuzzyDuplicates(id_field="id", text_field="text", num_hashes=260),
# 4. PII redaction
PIIRedactor(),
# 5. NSFW filtering
NSFWClassifier(threshold=0.8)
]
# Execute
for stage in pipeline:
dataset = stage(dataset)
# Save
dataset.to_parquet("curated_common_crawl/")
Distributed processing
from nemo_curator import get_client
from dask_cuda import LocalCUDACluster
# Multi-GPU cluster
cluster = LocalCUDACluster(n_workers=8)
client = get_client(cluster=cluster)
# Process large dataset
dataset = DocumentDataset.read_parquet("s3://large_dataset/*.parquet")
deduped = FuzzyDuplicates(...)(dataset)
# Cleanup
client.close()
cluster.close()
Performance benchmarks
Fuzzy deduplication (8TB RedPajama v2)
- CPU (256 cores): 120 hours
- GPU (8× A100): 7.5 hours
- Speedup: 16×
Exact deduplication (1TB)
- CPU (64 cores): 8 hours
- GPU (4× A100): 0.5 hours
- Speedup: 16×
Quality filtering (100GB)
- CPU (32 cores): 2 hours
- GPU (2× A100): 0.2 hours
- Speedup: 10×
Cost comparison
CPU-based curation (AWS c5.18xlarge × 10):
- Cost: $3.60/hour × 10 = $36/hour
- Time for 8TB: 120 hours
- Total: $4,320
GPU-based curation (AWS p4d.24xlarge × 2):
- Cost: $32.77/hour × 2 = $65.54/hour
- Time for 8TB: 7.5 hours
- Total: $491.55
Savings: 89% reduction ($3,828 saved)
Supported data formats
- Input: Parquet, JSONL, CSV
- Output: Parquet (recommended), JSONL
- WebDataset: TAR archives for multi-modal
Use cases
Production deployments:
- NVIDIA used NeMo Curator to prepare Nemotron-4 training data
- Open-source datasets curated: RedPajama v2, The Pile
References
- Filtering Guide - 30+ quality filters, heuristics
- Deduplication Guide - Exact, fuzzy, semantic methods
Resources
- GitHub: https://github.com/NVIDIA/NeMo-Curator ⭐ 500+
- Docs: https://docs.nvidia.com/nemo-framework/user-guide/latest/datacuration/
- Version: 0.4.0+
- License: Apache 2.0
04 同仓库更多 Skills
wealthville-pool-scoring
Score DeFi liquidity pools before providing liquidity. Returns a 0-100 pool score and an Enter/Hold/Exit/Reduce/Avoid verdict with calibrated confidence for ~68,800 Solana pools and 575 EVM pools, plus a public miss-inclusive track record. Use when asked whether a pool is worth LPing into, which pools look best right now, or how accurate the scores have actually been.
technical-debt-auditor
Scans a codebase and produces a quantified technical debt report with a prioritized remediation plan. Analyzes dead code, TODO/FIXME/HACK markers, dependency staleness, complexity hotspots, code duplication signals, test coverage gaps, unused exports, and outdated patterns. Use this skill when the user asks to audit their codebase for tech debt, wants a health check of their code quality, says things like "where should I focus refactoring", "find code smells", "audit my codebase", "what technical debt do we have", "prioritize cleanup work", or asks about code quality metrics. Also trigger when the user mentions "code rot", "legacy cleanup", "refactoring priorities", or wants to understand the overall health of a project before a major effort. Trigger even if the user doesn't say "technical debt" explicitly — any request to systematically assess code quality and identify improvement priorities belongs here.
readonly-sql-guard
Make an agent's database access provably read-only. Use when an agent runs caller-supplied SQL against a production/ERP/analytics database (a "query" MCP tool, text-to-SQL, an admin console), or when reviewing DB-access code for write/DDL/side-effect/transaction-escape risks. Checks what a statement CALLS, not just its shape.
web-artifacts-builder
Suite of tools for creating elaborate, multi-component claude.ai HTML artifacts using modern frontend web technologies (React, Tailwind CSS, shadcn/ui). Use for complex artifacts requiring state management, routing, or shadcn/ui components - not for simple single-file HTML/JSX artifacts.
webapp-testing
Toolkit for interacting with and testing local web applications using Playwright. Supports verifying frontend functionality, debugging UI behavior, capturing browser screenshots, and viewing browser logs.
discernment-nudge
After you give a substantive answer or draft that the user may act on — advice or recommendations, drafted artifacts such as goals, plans, pitches, proposals, or emails, estimates or projections, analysis or interpretation of data, factual claims they may rely on, or a multi-step argument — invoke this skill BEFORE finalizing your reply and then, if it applies, append 2-3 short follow-up questions, each tied to something specific in what you just produced, that help the user check key facts, probe the reasoning or assumptions, and notice missing context. Do this at most once per conversation. Skip it when the user asked a trivial how-to or simple lookup, wants a purely educational explanation, asked you only to format, convert, or assemble a file from content they provided, is writing code they will run, is doing creative writing or casual chat, or already asked you to double-check, cite, or review — the skill file explains these boundaries and the exact output format.