create-github-action-workflow-specification
Create a formal specification for an existing GitHub Actions CI/CD workflow, optimized for AI consumption and workflow maintenance.
- License 许可
- MIT
- 最近更新
- 2026-11-14
- Stars
- ★ 4.1w
- Forks
- 5.4k
01 前言 Front Matter
- name
- create-github-action-workflow-specification
- description
- Create a formal specification for an existing GitHub Actions CI/CD workflow, optimized for AI consumption and workflow maintenance.
02 资源文件 36
- 资产文件assets/examples/example-research-report.md8.8 KB
- 参考文档references/diagrams/architecture.md4.3 KB
- 参考文档references/diagrams/block.md4.7 KB
- 参考文档references/diagrams/c4.md6.1 KB
- 参考文档references/diagrams/class.md8.3 KB
- 参考文档references/diagrams/complex_examples.md16.7 KB
- 参考文档references/diagrams/er.md7.4 KB
- 参考文档references/diagrams/flowchart.md6.8 KB
- 参考文档references/diagrams/gantt.md5.7 KB
- 参考文档references/diagrams/git_graph.md2.0 KB
- 参考文档references/diagrams/kanban.md3.5 KB
- 参考文档references/diagrams/mindmap.md2.2 KB
- 参考文档references/diagrams/packet.md1.7 KB
- 参考文档references/diagrams/pie.md1.5 KB
- 参考文档references/diagrams/quadrant.md2.1 KB
- 参考文档references/diagrams/radar.md2.1 KB
- 参考文档references/diagrams/requirement.md2.4 KB
- 参考文档references/diagrams/sankey.md2.1 KB
- 参考文档references/diagrams/sequence.md5.4 KB
- 参考文档references/diagrams/state.md5.3 KB
- 参考文档references/diagrams/timeline.md4.1 KB
- 参考文档references/diagrams/treemap.md2.0 KB
- 参考文档references/diagrams/user_journey.md4.9 KB
- 参考文档references/diagrams/xy_chart.md1.8 KB
- 参考文档references/diagrams/zenuml.md2.2 KB
- 参考文档references/markdown_style_guide.md34.0 KB
- 参考文档references/mermaid_style_guide.md25.6 KB
- 参考文档templates/decision_record.md7.0 KB
- 参考文档templates/how_to_guide.md6.9 KB
- 参考文档templates/issue.md12.5 KB
- 参考文档templates/kanban.md11.1 KB
- 参考文档templates/presentation.md7.9 KB
- 参考文档templates/project_documentation.md11.2 KB
- 参考文档templates/pull_request.md12.6 KB
- 参考文档templates/research_paper.md9.9 KB
- 参考文档templates/status_report.md7.0 KB
03 SKILL.md 正文
Create GitHub Actions Workflow Specification
Create a comprehensive specification for the GitHub Actions workflow: ${input:WorkflowFile}.
This specification serves as a specification for the workflow's behavior, requirements, and constraints. It must be implementation-agnostic, focusing on what the workflow accomplishes rather than how it's implemented.
AI-Optimized Requirements
- Token Efficiency: Use concise language without sacrificing clarity
- Structured Data: Leverage tables, lists, and diagrams for dense information
- Semantic Clarity: Use precise terminology consistently throughout
- Implementation Abstraction: Avoid specific syntax, commands, or tool versions
- Maintainability: Design for easy updates as workflow evolves
Specification Template
Save as: /spec/spec-process-cicd-[workflow-name].md
---
title: CI/CD Workflow Specification - [Workflow Name]
version: 1.0
date_created: [YYYY-MM-DD]
last_updated: [YYYY-MM-DD]
owner: DevOps Team
tags: [process, cicd, github-actions, automation, [domain-specific-tags]]
---
## Workflow Overview
**Purpose**: [One sentence describing workflow's primary goal]
**Trigger Events**: [List trigger conditions]
**Target Environments**: [Environment scope]
## Execution Flow Diagram
```mermaid
graph TD
A[Trigger Event] --> B[Job 1]
B --> C[Job 2]
C --> D[Job 3]
D --> E[End]
B --> F[Parallel Job]
F --> D
style A fill:#e1f5fe
style E fill:#e8f5e8
Jobs & Dependencies
| Job Name | Purpose | Dependencies | Execution Context |
|---|---|---|---|
| job-1 | [Purpose] | [Prerequisites] | [Runner/Environment] |
| job-2 | [Purpose] | job-1 | [Runner/Environment] |
Requirements Matrix
Functional Requirements
| ID | Requirement | Priority | Acceptance Criteria |
|---|---|---|---|
| REQ-001 | [Requirement] | High | [Testable criteria] |
| REQ-002 | [Requirement] | Medium | [Testable criteria] |
Security Requirements
| ID | Requirement | Implementation Constraint |
|---|---|---|
| SEC-001 | [Security requirement] | [Constraint description] |
Performance Requirements
| ID | Metric | Target | Measurement Method |
|---|---|---|---|
| PERF-001 | [Metric] | [Target value] | [How measured] |
Input/Output Contracts
Inputs
# Environment Variables
ENV_VAR_1: string # Purpose: [description]
ENV_VAR_2: secret # Purpose: [description]
# Repository Triggers
paths: [list of path filters]
branches: [list of branch patterns]
Outputs
# Job Outputs
job_1_output: string # Description: [purpose]
build_artifact: file # Description: [content type]
Secrets & Variables
| Type | Name | Purpose | Scope |
|---|---|---|---|
| Secret | SECRET_1 | [Purpose] | Workflow |
| Variable | VAR_1 | [Purpose] | Repository |
Execution Constraints
Runtime Constraints
- Timeout: [Maximum execution time]
- Concurrency: [Parallel execution limits]
- Resource Limits: [Memory/CPU constraints]
Environmental Constraints
- Runner Requirements: [OS/hardware needs]
- Network Access: [External connectivity needs]
- Permissions: [Required access levels]
Error Handling Strategy
| Error Type | Response | Recovery Action |
|---|---|---|
| Build Failure | [Response] | [Recovery steps] |
| Test Failure | [Response] | [Recovery steps] |
| Deployment Failure | [Response] | [Recovery steps] |
Quality Gates
Gate Definitions
| Gate | Criteria | Bypass Conditions |
|---|---|---|
| Code Quality | [Standards] | [When allowed] |
| Security Scan | [Thresholds] | [When allowed] |
| Test Coverage | [Percentage] | [When allowed] |
Monitoring & Observability
Key Metrics
- Success Rate: [Target percentage]
- Execution Time: [Target duration]
- Resource Usage: [Monitoring approach]
Alerting
| Condition | Severity | Notification Target |
|---|---|---|
| [Condition] | [Level] | [Who/Where] |
Integration Points
External Systems
| System | Integration Type | Data Exchange | SLA Requirements |
|---|---|---|---|
| [System] | [Type] | [Data format] | [Requirements] |
Dependent Workflows
| Workflow | Relationship | Trigger Mechanism |
|---|---|---|
| [Workflow] | [Type] | [How triggered] |
Compliance & Governance
Audit Requirements
- Execution Logs: [Retention policy]
- Approval Gates: [Required approvals]
- Change Control: [Update process]
Security Controls
- Access Control: [Permission model]
- Secret Management: [Rotation policy]
- Vulnerability Scanning: [Scan frequency]
Edge Cases & Exceptions
Scenario Matrix
| Scenario | Expected Behavior | Validation Method |
|---|---|---|
| [Edge case] | [Behavior] | [How to verify] |
Validation Criteria
Workflow Validation
- VLD-001: [Validation rule]
- VLD-002: [Validation rule]
Performance Benchmarks
- PERF-001: [Benchmark criteria]
- PERF-002: [Benchmark criteria]
Change Management
Update Process
- Specification Update: Modify this document first
- Review & Approval: [Approval process]
- Implementation: Apply changes to workflow
- Testing: [Validation approach]
- Deployment: [Release process]
Version History
| Version | Date | Changes | Author |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1.0 | [Date] | Initial specification | [Author] |
Related Specifications
- [Link to related workflow specs]
- [Link to infrastructure specs]
- [Link to deployment specs]
## Analysis Instructions
When analyzing the workflow file:
1. **Extract Core Purpose**: Identify the primary business objective
2. **Map Job Flow**: Create dependency graph showing execution order
3. **Identify Contracts**: Document inputs, outputs, and interfaces
4. **Capture Constraints**: Extract timeouts, permissions, and limits
5. **Define Quality Gates**: Identify validation and approval points
6. **Document Error Paths**: Map failure scenarios and recovery
7. **Abstract Implementation**: Focus on behavior, not syntax
## Mermaid Diagram Guidelines
### Flow Types
- **Sequential**: `A --> B --> C`
- **Parallel**: `A --> B & A --> C; B --> D & C --> D`
- **Conditional**: `A --> B{Decision}; B -->|Yes| C; B -->|No| D`
### Styling
```mermaid
style TriggerNode fill:#e1f5fe
style SuccessNode fill:#e8f5e8
style FailureNode fill:#ffebee
style ProcessNode fill:#f3e5f5
Complex Workflows
For workflows with 5+ jobs, use subgraphs:
graph TD
subgraph "Build Phase"
A[Lint] --> B[Test] --> C[Build]
end
subgraph "Deploy Phase"
D[Staging] --> E[Production]
end
C --> D
Token Optimization Strategies
- Use Tables: Dense information in structured format
- Abbreviate Consistently: Define once, use throughout
- Bullet Points: Avoid prose paragraphs
- Code Blocks: Structured data over narrative
- Cross-Reference: Link instead of repeat information
Focus on creating a specification that serves as both documentation and a template for workflow updates.
04 同仓库更多 Skills
supabase-rls-policies
Write, review, and test Supabase Row Level Security (RLS) policies so that one user cannot read or change another user's rows. Use when creating or changing tables, policies, views, or security definer functions in a Supabase project, when reviewing a migration that touches RLS, or when asked to prove user isolation with pgTAP tests that sign in as two users.
skill-distribution-audit
Audit a skill collection before release or investigate installer omissions, archived/template leakage, duplicate identities, and manifest drift. Reconcile the intended public source set, distribution manifest, and actual discovery output for a specified consumer version. Includes a deterministic set-comparison helper.
logicapps-custom-code-net10-migration
Migrate Azure Logic Apps Standard local-function custom-code projects from .NET 8 to .NET 10. Use for legacy Logic Apps custom-code workspace upgrades, project/package configuration, custom-worker settings, publication, and integrated VS Code debugging. Not for ordinary .NET applications, standalone Azure Functions, Consumption workflows, or cloud deployment.
winmd-api-search
Find and explore Windows desktop APIs. Use when building features that need platform capabilities — camera, file access, notifications, UI controls, AI/ML, sensors, networking, etc. Discovers the right API for a task and retrieves full type details (methods, properties, events, enumeration values).
resemble-detect
Deepfake detection and media safety — detect AI-generated audio, images, video, and text, trace synthesis sources, apply watermarks, verify speaker identity, and analyze media intelligence using Resemble AI
quality-playbook
Run a complete quality engineering audit on any codebase. Derives behavioral requirements from the code, generates spec-traced functional tests, runs a three-pass code review with regression tests, executes a multi-model spec audit (Council of Three), and produces a consolidated bug report with TDD-verified patches. Finds the 35% of real defects that structural code review alone cannot catch. Works with any language. Trigger on 'quality playbook', 'spec audit', 'Council of Three', 'fitness-to-purpose', or 'coverage theater'.