[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"skill:01M6ADA5PXK0YTREPQ7REJH8ZC":3,"skill-same:01M6ADA5PXK0YTREPQ7REJH8ZC":64},{"skillNo":4,"name":5,"nameZh":6,"description":7,"descriptionZh":6,"repositoryFullName":8,"ownerLogin":9,"ownerAvatarUrl":10,"ownerAccountNo":11,"ownerDisplayName":12,"repositoryNo":13,"starsCount":14,"licenseSpdxId":15,"licenseFileUrl":6,"sourceHtmlUrl":16,"categories":17,"keywords":18,"publishedAt":29,"linkOnly":30,"markdownContent":31,"markdownBody":32,"frontMatter":33,"refName":34,"commitSha":35,"skillDirectory":36,"forksCount":37,"repositoryHtmlUrl":38,"repositoryHomepageUrl":39,"ownerHtmlUrl":40,"ownerBlogUrl":41,"ownerDescription":42,"updatedAt":43,"install":44,"resources":57},"01M6ADA5PXK0YTREPQ7REJH8ZC","bug-reproduction-brief",null,"Turn a vague, intermittent, or environment-specific bug report into a minimal evidence-backed reproduction before proposing a fix.","github\u002Fawesome-copilot","github","https:\u002F\u002Favatars.githubusercontent.com\u002Fu\u002F9919?v=4","01M6AC83DS133TPXFSP1DHNCC6","GitHub","01M6AD3PBDYPK7NVFJNJ66Y8RS",41081,"MIT","https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002Fgithub\u002Fawesome-copilot\u002Fblob\u002Fmain\u002Fskills\u002Fbug-reproduction-brief\u002FSKILL.md",[],[19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27,28],"brief","bug reproduction brief","bug","bug report","report","fix","environment","evidence","minimal","vague","2026-11-10 10:12:30",false,"---\nname: bug-reproduction-brief\ndescription: 'Turn a vague, intermittent, or environment-specific bug report into a minimal evidence-backed reproduction before proposing a fix.'\n---\n\n# Bug Reproduction Brief\n\nUse this skill when a bug report is incomplete, intermittent, environment-specific, or mixed with an assumed cause. The goal is to prove the smallest observable failure before diagnosis or repair begins.\n\n## 1. Record the observed failure\n\nCapture the exact error, incorrect output, timestamp, affected route or command, and the smallest known input. Preserve relevant logs without secrets or personal data. Label second-hand descriptions as unverified.\n\n## 2. Identify the environment\n\nRecord only facts you can inspect:\n\n- repository and commit;\n- runtime and package-manager versions;\n- operating system or container;\n- dependency lockfile;\n- relevant feature flags;\n- whether the target is local, test, staging, or production.\n\nNever guess credentials or production configuration.\n\n## 3. Separate expected from actual behaviour\n\nWrite two explicit observable statements:\n\n```text\nExpected: [observable result]\nActual:   [observable result, including status or error]\n```\n\nDo not put the suspected cause in either statement.\n\n## 4. Reduce the reproduction\n\nStart from the reported path, then remove unrelated data, services, and steps one at a time. Keep the smallest fixture that still fails. If the failure stops, restore the last removed condition and record it.\n\nPrefer an isolated test, minimal script, or smallest safe request over reproducing against production.\n\n## 5. Prove repeatability\n\nRun the minimal reproduction at least twice where safe. Record commands and outputs. If the failure is intermittent, report the observed frequency and duration instead of calling it deterministic.\n\n## 6. Stop before repair\n\nA verified reproduction is the deliverable. Do not edit implementation code while building the brief because that can destroy the evidence or mix diagnosis with remediation.\n\n## Output\n\n```markdown\n# Bug Reproduction Brief\n\n- Target and commit:\n- Environment:\n- Expected:\n- Actual:\n- Minimal steps:\n- Minimal fixture:\n- Reproduced: yes \u002F no \u002F intermittent\n- Evidence:\n- Unknowns:\n- Safe next hypothesis to test:\n```\n\n## Safety boundaries\n\n- Do not change production data merely to reproduce a bug.\n- Do not publish secrets, customer records, or private source.\n- Do not claim a root cause from correlation alone.\n- Use read-only or reversible discovery first.\n- Stop after a verified reproduction; diagnosis and repair are separate workflows.\n\n## Example prompt\n\n```text\nUse the Bug Reproduction Brief skill on the failing checkout test. Do not fix it yet. Reduce it to the smallest safe failing fixture and report the exact command evidence, expected result, actual result, and remaining unknowns.\n```\n\n## Source and licence\n\nAdapted from the MIT-licensed workflow at https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002Fskyestrela\u002Fai-agent-skill-preview.\n","# Bug Reproduction Brief\n\nUse this skill when a bug report is incomplete, intermittent, environment-specific, or mixed with an assumed cause. The goal is to prove the smallest observable failure before diagnosis or repair begins.\n\n## 1. Record the observed failure\n\nCapture the exact error, incorrect output, timestamp, affected route or command, and the smallest known input. Preserve relevant logs without secrets or personal data. Label second-hand descriptions as unverified.\n\n## 2. Identify the environment\n\nRecord only facts you can inspect:\n\n- repository and commit;\n- runtime and package-manager versions;\n- operating system or container;\n- dependency lockfile;\n- relevant feature flags;\n- whether the target is local, test, staging, or production.\n\nNever guess credentials or production configuration.\n\n## 3. Separate expected from actual behaviour\n\nWrite two explicit observable statements:\n\n```text\nExpected: [observable result]\nActual:   [observable result, including status or error]\n```\n\nDo not put the suspected cause in either statement.\n\n## 4. Reduce the reproduction\n\nStart from the reported path, then remove unrelated data, services, and steps one at a time. Keep the smallest fixture that still fails. If the failure stops, restore the last removed condition and record it.\n\nPrefer an isolated test, minimal script, or smallest safe request over reproducing against production.\n\n## 5. Prove repeatability\n\nRun the minimal reproduction at least twice where safe. Record commands and outputs. If the failure is intermittent, report the observed frequency and duration instead of calling it deterministic.\n\n## 6. Stop before repair\n\nA verified reproduction is the deliverable. Do not edit implementation code while building the brief because that can destroy the evidence or mix diagnosis with remediation.\n\n## Output\n\n```markdown\n# Bug Reproduction Brief\n\n- Target and commit:\n- Environment:\n- Expected:\n- Actual:\n- Minimal steps:\n- Minimal fixture:\n- Reproduced: yes \u002F no \u002F intermittent\n- Evidence:\n- Unknowns:\n- Safe next hypothesis to test:\n```\n\n## Safety boundaries\n\n- Do not change production data merely to reproduce a bug.\n- Do not publish secrets, customer records, or private source.\n- Do not claim a root cause from correlation alone.\n- Use read-only or reversible discovery first.\n- Stop after a verified reproduction; diagnosis and repair are separate workflows.\n\n## Example prompt\n\n```text\nUse the Bug Reproduction Brief skill on the failing checkout test. Do not fix it yet. Reduce it to the smallest safe failing fixture and report the exact command evidence, expected result, actual result, and remaining unknowns.\n```\n\n## Source and licence\n\nAdapted from the MIT-licensed workflow at https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002Fskyestrela\u002Fai-agent-skill-preview.\n",{"name":5,"description":7},"main","5269f7ea2d6c3a9bfda5ed878b6726cf509121fd","skills\u002Fbug-reproduction-brief",5344,"https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002Fgithub\u002Fawesome-copilot","https:\u002F\u002Fawesome-copilot.github.com\u002F","https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002Fgithub","https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002Fabout","How people build software.","2026-11-13 02:05:36",{"source":8,"skillName":5,"commands":45,"prompt":55,"zipAvailable":56},[46,49,52],{"tool":47,"command":48},"npx","npx skills add github\u002Fawesome-copilot --skill bug-reproduction-brief",{"tool":50,"command":51},"bunx","bunx skills add github\u002Fawesome-copilot --skill bug-reproduction-brief",{"tool":53,"command":54},"pnpm","pnpm dlx skills add github\u002Fawesome-copilot --skill bug-reproduction-brief","安装技能，技能地址：https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002Fgithub\u002Fawesome-copilot\u002Fblob\u002Fmain\u002Fskills\u002Fbug-reproduction-brief\u002FSKILL.md",true,[58],{"path":59,"resourceType":60,"resourceTypeDesc":61,"sizeBytes":62,"sourceHtmlUrl":63},"routing-eval.jsonl","OTHER","其他",589,"https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002Fshengdabai\u002FTony-Claude-Code-Skills\u002Fblob\u002Fmain\u002Fskills\u002Fgbrain-brain-pdf\u002Frouting-eval.jsonl",[65,100,128,158,192,209],{"skillNo":66,"name":67,"nameZh":6,"description":68,"descriptionZh":6,"repositoryFullName":8,"ownerLogin":9,"ownerAvatarUrl":10,"ownerAccountNo":11,"ownerDisplayName":12,"repositoryNo":13,"starsCount":14,"licenseSpdxId":15,"licenseFileUrl":6,"sourceHtmlUrl":69,"categories":70,"keywords":79,"publishedAt":29},"01M70KXZNX9ES38N2A8M58ZZMZ","supabase-rls-policies","Write, review, and test Supabase Row Level Security (RLS) policies so that one user cannot read or change another user's rows. Use when creating or changing tables, policies, views, or security definer functions in a Supabase project, when reviewing a migration that touches RLS, or when asked to prove user isolation with pgTAP tests that sign in as two users.","https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002Fgithub\u002Fawesome-copilot\u002Fblob\u002Fmain\u002Fskills\u002Fsupabase-rls-policies\u002FSKILL.md",[71,76],{"categoryNo":72,"categoryName":73,"taxonomyType":74,"taxonomyTypeDesc":75},"01JBSEEDCAT000000000000008","测试与质量","SCENARIO","使用场景",{"categoryNo":77,"categoryName":78,"taxonomyType":74,"taxonomyTypeDesc":75},"01JBSEEDCAT000000000000023","Skill与智能体开发",[80,81,82,83,84,85,86,87,88,89,90,91,92,93,94,95,96,97,98,99],"supabase","rls","supabase rls","supabase rls policies","project","when","review","change","read","write","security","isolation","tables","as","tests","prove","use","users","functions","with",{"skillNo":101,"name":102,"nameZh":6,"description":103,"descriptionZh":6,"repositoryFullName":8,"ownerLogin":9,"ownerAvatarUrl":10,"ownerAccountNo":11,"ownerDisplayName":12,"repositoryNo":13,"starsCount":14,"licenseSpdxId":15,"licenseFileUrl":6,"sourceHtmlUrl":104,"categories":105,"keywords":107,"publishedAt":29},"01M70KWA5YWXDV6V8DZ19E3T2Y","skill-distribution-audit","Audit a skill collection before release or investigate installer omissions, archived\u002Ftemplate leakage, duplicate identities, and manifest drift. Reconcile the intended public source set, distribution manifest, and actual discovery output for a specified consumer version. Includes a deterministic set-comparison helper.","https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002Fgithub\u002Fawesome-copilot\u002Fblob\u002Fmain\u002Fskills\u002Fskill-distribution-audit\u002FSKILL.md",[106],{"categoryNo":77,"categoryName":78,"taxonomyType":74,"taxonomyTypeDesc":75},[108,109,110,111,112,113,114,115,116,117,118,119,120,121,122,123,124,125,126,127],"distribution","skill distribution audit","audit","SET","deterministic","installer","for","discovery","comparison","helper","manifest","version","collection","drift","output","investigate","duplicate","template","release","reconcile",{"skillNo":129,"name":130,"nameZh":6,"description":131,"descriptionZh":6,"repositoryFullName":8,"ownerLogin":9,"ownerAvatarUrl":10,"ownerAccountNo":11,"ownerDisplayName":12,"repositoryNo":13,"starsCount":14,"licenseSpdxId":15,"licenseFileUrl":132,"sourceHtmlUrl":133,"categories":134,"keywords":140,"publishedAt":29},"01M70KCJPFVW7PPQ49CC5R8JGK","logicapps-custom-code-net10-migration","Migrate Azure Logic Apps Standard local-function custom-code projects from .NET 8 to .NET 10. Use for legacy Logic Apps custom-code workspace upgrades, project\u002Fpackage configuration, custom-worker settings, publication, and integrated VS Code debugging. Not for ordinary .NET applications, standalone Azure Functions, Consumption workflows, or cloud deployment.","https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002Fgithub\u002Fawesome-copilot\u002Fblob\u002Fmain\u002Fskills\u002Flogicapps-custom-code-net10-migration\u002FLICENSE","https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002Fgithub\u002Fawesome-copilot\u002Fblob\u002Fmain\u002Fskills\u002Flogicapps-custom-code-net10-migration\u002FSKILL.md",[135],{"categoryNo":136,"categoryName":137,"taxonomyType":138,"taxonomyTypeDesc":139},"01JBSEEDCAT000000000000030","开发工程师","PROFESSION","适用职业",[141,142,143,144,145,146,114,84,147,148,149,150,151,152,153,96,154,155,156,157],"custom","code","logicapps custom code net10 migration","migration","projects","standalone","deployment","applications","local","azure","worker","upgrades","package","apps","Legacy","debugging","workflows",{"skillNo":159,"name":160,"nameZh":6,"description":161,"descriptionZh":6,"repositoryFullName":8,"ownerLogin":9,"ownerAvatarUrl":10,"ownerAccountNo":11,"ownerDisplayName":12,"repositoryNo":13,"starsCount":14,"licenseSpdxId":15,"licenseFileUrl":162,"sourceHtmlUrl":163,"categories":164,"keywords":169,"publishedAt":29},"01M6AEBN37RQMXJ3298PEY7PG1","winmd-api-search","Find and explore Windows desktop APIs. Use when building features that need platform capabilities — camera, file access, notifications, UI controls, AI\u002FML, sensors, networking, etc. Discovers the right API for a task and retrieves full type details (methods, properties, events, enumeration values).","https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002Fgithub\u002Fawesome-copilot\u002Fblob\u002Fmain\u002Fskills\u002Fwinmd-api-search\u002FLICENSE.txt","https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002Fgithub\u002Fawesome-copilot\u002Fblob\u002Fmain\u002Fskills\u002Fwinmd-api-search\u002FSKILL.md",[165,168],{"categoryNo":166,"categoryName":167,"taxonomyType":74,"taxonomyTypeDesc":75},"01JBSEEDCAT000000000000010","后端与接口",{"categoryNo":136,"categoryName":137,"taxonomyType":138,"taxonomyTypeDesc":139},[170,171,172,173,174,175,176,177,178,179,180,181,182,183,184,85,185,186,187,188,189,114,190,191],"winmd api search","search","api","windows","desktop","file access","enumeration","ui","ml","file","networking","capabilities","notifications","explore","access","features","full","camera","events","platform","methods","controls",{"skillNo":193,"name":194,"nameZh":6,"description":195,"descriptionZh":6,"repositoryFullName":8,"ownerLogin":9,"ownerAvatarUrl":10,"ownerAccountNo":11,"ownerDisplayName":12,"repositoryNo":13,"starsCount":14,"licenseSpdxId":196,"licenseFileUrl":197,"sourceHtmlUrl":198,"categories":199,"keywords":205,"publishedAt":29},"01M6AE571R3SC1ZGE202B3NB5S","resemble-detect","Deepfake detection and media safety — detect AI-generated audio, images, video, and text, trace synthesis sources, apply watermarks, verify speaker identity, and analyze media intelligence using Resemble AI","Apache-2.0","https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002Fgithub\u002Fawesome-copilot\u002Fblob\u002Fmain\u002Fskills\u002Fresemble-detect\u002FLICENSE","https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002Fgithub\u002Fawesome-copilot\u002Fblob\u002Fmain\u002Fskills\u002Fresemble-detect\u002FSKILL.md",[200,201,204],{"categoryNo":166,"categoryName":167,"taxonomyType":74,"taxonomyTypeDesc":75},{"categoryNo":202,"categoryName":203,"taxonomyType":74,"taxonomyTypeDesc":75},"01JBSEEDCAT000000000000016","图像与多媒体",{"categoryNo":77,"categoryName":78,"taxonomyType":74,"taxonomyTypeDesc":75},[206,111,179,207,208],"resemble detect","https","identity",{"skillNo":210,"name":211,"nameZh":6,"description":212,"descriptionZh":6,"repositoryFullName":8,"ownerLogin":9,"ownerAvatarUrl":10,"ownerAccountNo":11,"ownerDisplayName":12,"repositoryNo":13,"starsCount":14,"licenseSpdxId":196,"licenseFileUrl":213,"sourceHtmlUrl":214,"categories":215,"keywords":220,"publishedAt":29},"01M6AE30BSK2HCY4TQQ22Z8JRD","quality-playbook","Run a complete quality engineering audit on any codebase. Derives behavioral requirements from the code, generates spec-traced functional tests, runs a three-pass code review with regression tests, executes a multi-model spec audit (Council of Three), and produces a consolidated bug report with TDD-verified patches. Finds the 35% of real defects that structural code review alone cannot catch. Works with any language. Trigger on 'quality playbook', 'spec audit', 'Council of Three', 'fitness-to-purpose', or 'coverage theater'.","https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002Fgithub\u002Fawesome-copilot\u002Fblob\u002Fmain\u002Fskills\u002Fquality-playbook\u002FLICENSE.txt","https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002Fgithub\u002Fawesome-copilot\u002Fblob\u002Fmain\u002Fskills\u002Fquality-playbook\u002FSKILL.md",[216,219],{"categoryNo":217,"categoryName":218,"taxonomyType":74,"taxonomyTypeDesc":75},"01JBSEEDCAT000000000000007","代码审查",{"categoryNo":77,"categoryName":78,"taxonomyType":74,"taxonomyTypeDesc":75},[221,222,223,224,142,86,9,110,225,226,207,23,227,22,228,229,230,231,21,232,233,234,94,235,236,237,238],"playbook","quality playbook","quality","code review","tdd","run","spec","council","engineering","functional","spec audit","verified","multi-model","three","coverage","model","regression","structural"]