AGENT SKILL

aws-cost-optimize

Analyze AWS resources used in the app (IaC files and/or resources in a target account/region) and optimize costs - creating GitHub issues for identified optimizations.

License 许可
MIT
最近更新
2026-11-13
Stars
★ 4.1w
Forks
5.3k

01 前言 Front Matter

name
aws-cost-optimize
description
Analyze AWS resources used in the app (IaC files and/or resources in a target account/region) and optimize costs - creating GitHub issues for identified optimizations.

03 SKILL.md 正文

AWS Cost Optimize

This workflow analyzes Infrastructure-as-Code (IaC) files and AWS resources to generate cost optimization recommendations. It creates individual GitHub issues for each optimization opportunity plus one EPIC issue to coordinate implementation, enabling efficient tracking and execution of cost savings initiatives.

Prerequisites

  • AWS CLI configured and authenticated (aws sts get-caller-identity succeeds)
  • GitHub MCP server configured and authenticated
  • Target GitHub repository identified
  • AWS resources deployed (IaC files optional but helpful)

Workflow Steps

Step 1: Get AWS Cost Optimization Best Practices

Action: Retrieve cost optimization best practices before analysis Tools: fetch to retrieve AWS documentation Process:

  1. Load Best Practices:
    • Fetch https://docs.aws.amazon.com/cost-management/latest/userguide/cost-optimization-best-practices.html
    • Fetch the AWS Well-Architected Cost Optimization pillar summary
    • Use these practices to inform subsequent analysis and recommendations

Step 2: Discover AWS Infrastructure

Action: Dynamically discover and analyze AWS resources and configurations Tools: AWS CLI + Local file system access Process:

  1. Account & Region Discovery:

    • Execute aws sts get-caller-identity to confirm account
    • Execute aws configure get region to determine default region
  2. Resource Discovery (per region):

    • EC2 instances: aws ec2 describe-instances --query 'Reservations[].Instances[].[InstanceId,InstanceType,State.Name,Tags]'
    • RDS instances: aws rds describe-db-instances --query 'DBInstances[].[DBInstanceIdentifier,DBInstanceClass,Engine,MultiAZ]'
    • Lambda functions: aws lambda list-functions --query 'Functions[].[FunctionName,Runtime,MemorySize,Architectures]'
    • ECS clusters/services: aws ecs list-clusters then aws ecs describe-services
    • S3 buckets: aws s3api list-buckets --query 'Buckets[].Name'
    • ElastiCache clusters: aws elasticache describe-cache-clusters
    • NAT Gateways: aws ec2 describe-nat-gateways
    • Load Balancers: aws elbv2 describe-load-balancers
  3. IaC Detection:

    • Scan for IaC files: **/*.tf, **/*.yaml (CloudFormation/SAM), **/*.json (CloudFormation), **/cdk.json, lib/**/*.ts (CDK)
    • Parse resource definitions to understand intended configurations
    • Do NOT use application code files — only IaC files as the source of truth
    • If no IaC files found: STOP and report to user

Step 3: Collect Usage Metrics & Validate Current Costs

Action: Gather utilization data and verify actual resource costs Tools: AWS CLI (CloudWatch, Cost Explorer) Process:

  1. CloudWatch Metrics (last 7 days):

    # EC2 CPU utilization
    aws cloudwatch get-metric-statistics \
      --namespace AWS/EC2 --metric-name CPUUtilization \
      --dimensions Name=InstanceId,Value=<id> \
      --start-time $(date -u -d '7 days ago' +%Y-%m-%dT%H:%M:%SZ) \
      --end-time $(date -u +%Y-%m-%dT%H:%M:%SZ) \
      --period 3600 --statistics Average
    
    # Lambda duration
    aws cloudwatch get-metric-statistics \
      --namespace AWS/Lambda --metric-name Duration \
      --dimensions Name=FunctionName,Value=<name> \
      --start-time $(date -u -d '7 days ago' +%Y-%m-%dT%H:%M:%SZ) \
      --end-time $(date -u +%Y-%m-%dT%H:%M:%SZ) \
      --period 86400 --statistics Average,Maximum
    
  2. AWS Cost Explorer:

    aws ce get-cost-and-usage \
      --time-period Start=$(date -u -d '30 days ago' +%Y-%m-%d),End=$(date -u +%Y-%m-%d) \
      --granularity MONTHLY --metrics BlendedCost \
      --group-by Type=DIMENSION,Key=SERVICE
    
  3. Calculate Baseline Metrics: CPU/Memory averages, Lambda invocation rates, data transfer patterns, and a realistic current monthly total.

Step 4: Generate Cost Optimization Recommendations

Action: Analyze resources to identify optimization opportunities Process:

  1. Apply Optimization Patterns:

    Compute:

    • EC2: Right-size based on CPU/memory (<20% average → downsize), convert On-Demand to Savings Plans, migrate to Graviton/ARM (up to 40% cheaper)
    • Lambda: Reduce memory for idle functions, switch to arm64 (20% cheaper)
    • ECS/EKS: Use Fargate Spot for dev/batch workloads

    Database:

    • RDS: Right-size instance class, convert single-AZ for dev, use Aurora Serverless v2 for variable load
    • DynamoDB: Switch Provisioned → On-Demand for unpredictable traffic
    • ElastiCache: Right-size node type based on memory utilization

    Storage:

    • S3: Lifecycle policies (Standard → Standard-IA after 30d → Glacier after 90d), enable Intelligent-Tiering
    • EBS: Delete unattached volumes, convert gp2 → gp3 (same performance, 20% cheaper)

    Network:

    • Consolidate NAT Gateways for non-production environments
    • Use VPC endpoints for S3/DynamoDB to avoid NAT Gateway charges
  2. Calculate Priority Score:

    Priority Score = (Value Score × Monthly Savings) / (Risk Score × Implementation Days)
    High: Score > 20 | Medium: Score 5-20 | Low: Score < 5
    

Step 5: User Confirmation

Action: Present summary and get approval before creating GitHub issues

? AWS Cost Optimization Summary

? Analysis Results:
• Total Resources Analyzed: X
• Current Monthly Cost: $X
• Potential Monthly Savings: $Y
• Optimization Opportunities: Z
• High Priority Items: N

? Recommendations:
1. [Resource]: [Current] → [Target] = $X/month savings - [Risk] | [Effort]
...

? This will create Y individual GitHub issues + 1 EPIC issue.

❓ Proceed with creating GitHub issues? (y/n)

Wait for user confirmation before proceeding.

Step 6: Create Individual Optimization Issues

Action: Create separate GitHub issues for each optimization. Label with "cost-optimization" (green) and "aws" (orange).

Title: [COST-OPT] [Resource Type] - [Brief Description] - $X/month savings

Body:

## ? Cost Optimization: [Brief Title]

**Monthly Savings**: $X | **Risk Level**: [Low/Medium/High] | **Effort**: X days

### ? Description
[Clear explanation of the optimization and why it's needed]

### ? Implementation

**IaC Files Detected**: [Yes/No]

```bash
# IaC modification (preferred) or AWS CLI fallback
```

### ? Evidence
- Current Configuration: [details]
- Usage Pattern: [evidence from CloudWatch]
- Cost Impact: $X/month → $Y/month

### ✅ Validation Steps
- [ ] Test in non-production environment
- [ ] Verify no performance degradation via CloudWatch
- [ ] Confirm cost reduction in AWS Cost Explorer

### ⚠️ Risks & Considerations
- [Risk and mitigation]

**Priority Score**: X | **Value**: X/10 | **Risk**: X/10

Step 7: Create EPIC Coordinating Issue

Action: Create master tracking issue. Label with "cost-optimization" (green), "aws" (orange), "epic" (purple).

Title: [EPIC] AWS Cost Optimization Initiative - $X/month potential savings

Body: Executive summary with account/region details, Mermaid architecture diagram of current resources, prioritized checklist linking all individual issues (High → Medium → Low), progress tracking, and success criteria (>80% of estimated savings realized, no performance degradation).

Error Handling

  • AWS Authentication Failure: Guide through aws configure
  • No Resources Found: Create informational issue about AWS resource deployment
  • Insufficient Permissions: List required IAM read-only permissions
  • GitHub Creation Failure: Output formatted recommendations to console
  • Cost Explorer Not Enabled: Guide user to enable in AWS Console

Success Criteria

  • ✅ All cost estimates verified against actual configurations and AWS pricing
  • ✅ Individual GitHub issues created for each optimization
  • ✅ EPIC issue provides comprehensive coordination and tracking
  • ✅ All recommendations include specific AWS CLI or IaC commands
  • ✅ User confirmation obtained before creating issues

04 同仓库更多 Skills

github
github/awesome-copilot

supabase-rls-policies

Write, review, and test Supabase Row Level Security (RLS) policies so that one user cannot read or change another user's rows. Use when creating or changing tables, policies, views, or security definer functions in a Supabase project, when reviewing a migration that touches RLS, or when asked to prove user isolation with pgTAP tests that sign in as two users.

测试与质量Skill与智能体开发
★ 4.1w
github
github/awesome-copilot

skill-distribution-audit

Audit a skill collection before release or investigate installer omissions, archived/template leakage, duplicate identities, and manifest drift. Reconcile the intended public source set, distribution manifest, and actual discovery output for a specified consumer version. Includes a deterministic set-comparison helper.

Skill与智能体开发
★ 4.1w
github
github/awesome-copilot

logicapps-custom-code-net10-migration

Migrate Azure Logic Apps Standard local-function custom-code projects from .NET 8 to .NET 10. Use for legacy Logic Apps custom-code workspace upgrades, project/package configuration, custom-worker settings, publication, and integrated VS Code debugging. Not for ordinary .NET applications, standalone Azure Functions, Consumption workflows, or cloud deployment.

开发工程师
★ 4.1w
github
github/awesome-copilot

winmd-api-search

Find and explore Windows desktop APIs. Use when building features that need platform capabilities — camera, file access, notifications, UI controls, AI/ML, sensors, networking, etc. Discovers the right API for a task and retrieves full type details (methods, properties, events, enumeration values).

开发工程师后端与接口
★ 4.1w
github
github/awesome-copilot

resemble-detect

Deepfake detection and media safety — detect AI-generated audio, images, video, and text, trace synthesis sources, apply watermarks, verify speaker identity, and analyze media intelligence using Resemble AI

后端与接口图像与多媒体
★ 4.1w
github
github/awesome-copilot

quality-playbook

Run a complete quality engineering audit on any codebase. Derives behavioral requirements from the code, generates spec-traced functional tests, runs a three-pass code review with regression tests, executes a multi-model spec audit (Council of Three), and produces a consolidated bug report with TDD-verified patches. Finds the 35% of real defects that structural code review alone cannot catch. Works with any language. Trigger on 'quality playbook', 'spec audit', 'Council of Three', 'fitness-to-purpose', or 'coverage theater'.

代码审查Skill与智能体开发
★ 4.1w