audit-integrity
Enforce output quality, evidence verification, and quality gates across security audits. Use this skill when you perform SAST, SCA, threat modeling, or security code reviews. Use this skill to verify code locations and taint traces for all findings. Use this skill to prevent the suppression of valid security findings. Use this skill to evaluate reports against quality thresholds (score ≥ 8/10) before delivery.
- License 许可
- MIT
- 最近更新
- 2026-11-13
- Stars
- ★ 4.1w
- Forks
- 5.3k
01 前言 Front Matter
- name
- audit-integrity
- license
- MIT
- metadata
- { "version": "1.1" }
- description
- Enforce output quality, evidence verification, and quality gates across security audits. Use this skill when you perform SAST, SCA, threat modeling, or security code reviews. Use this skill to verify code locations and taint traces for all findings. Use this skill to prevent the suppression of valid security findings. Use this skill to evaluate reports against quality thresholds (score ≥ 8/10) before delivery.
02 资源文件 7
- 参考文档references/anti-rationalization-guard.md3.2 KB
- 参考文档references/clarification-protocol.md807 B
- 参考文档references/non-negotiable-behaviors.md1.2 KB
- 参考文档references/retry-protocol.md536 B
- 参考文档references/self-critique-loop.md1.6 KB
- 参考文档references/self-learning-system.md2.2 KB
- 参考文档references/self-reflection-quality-gate.md4.6 KB
03 SKILL.md 正文
Audit Integrity Skill
Enforce output quality, intellectual honesty, and continuous improvement across security audits and code reviews.
When to Use
- Perform security analyses, threat models, code reviews, or quality audits.
- Validate that every finding has verified code evidence and taint flow.
- Prevent the suppression or rationalization of security findings.
- Evaluate draft reports against the quality gate threshold (score ≥ 8/10).
- Record lessons learned and security memories after you complete a scan.
Components
This skill provides 7 modular capabilities in the references/ directory. Load each file when you reach its execution phase:
| Component | Reference File | Purpose |
|---|---|---|
| Clarification Protocol | references/clarification-protocol.md | Ask a maximum of 2 targeted questions when scope is not clear |
| Anti-Rationalization Guard | references/anti-rationalization-guard.md | Prohibited rationalizations and mandatory responses for findings |
| Self-Critique Loop | references/self-critique-loop.md | Mandatory second pass to verify evidence and coverage |
| Retry Protocol | references/retry-protocol.md | Tool failure and empty search handling: retry once, then document |
| Non-Negotiable Behaviors | references/non-negotiable-behaviors.md | Mandatory rules: do not fabricate, cite evidence, report gaps |
| Self-Reflection Quality Gate | references/self-reflection-quality-gate.md | Scoring rubric (1–10 scale) with a minimum threshold of 8 |
| Self-Learning System | references/self-learning-system.md | Templates and rules for lessons and security memories |
Execution Flow
Load reference files as you reach each phase:
- Before analysis: If scope or policy is not clear, read references/clarification-protocol.md. Ask a maximum of 2 targeted questions.
- During analysis: Follow references/non-negotiable-behaviors.md. At each triage decision, consult references/anti-rationalization-guard.md.
- On tool or search failure: Follow references/retry-protocol.md. Do not assume code is secure without verification.
- After initial analysis: Complete a second pass with the checklist in references/self-critique-loop.md. Verify taint traces and manifest coverage.
- Before delivery: Score the draft report using references/self-reflection-quality-gate.md. All categories must score ≥ 8.
- Final delivery: Record lessons and memories using references/self-learning-system.md.
04 同仓库更多 Skills
supabase-rls-policies
Write, review, and test Supabase Row Level Security (RLS) policies so that one user cannot read or change another user's rows. Use when creating or changing tables, policies, views, or security definer functions in a Supabase project, when reviewing a migration that touches RLS, or when asked to prove user isolation with pgTAP tests that sign in as two users.
skill-distribution-audit
Audit a skill collection before release or investigate installer omissions, archived/template leakage, duplicate identities, and manifest drift. Reconcile the intended public source set, distribution manifest, and actual discovery output for a specified consumer version. Includes a deterministic set-comparison helper.
logicapps-custom-code-net10-migration
Migrate Azure Logic Apps Standard local-function custom-code projects from .NET 8 to .NET 10. Use for legacy Logic Apps custom-code workspace upgrades, project/package configuration, custom-worker settings, publication, and integrated VS Code debugging. Not for ordinary .NET applications, standalone Azure Functions, Consumption workflows, or cloud deployment.
winmd-api-search
Find and explore Windows desktop APIs. Use when building features that need platform capabilities — camera, file access, notifications, UI controls, AI/ML, sensors, networking, etc. Discovers the right API for a task and retrieves full type details (methods, properties, events, enumeration values).
resemble-detect
Deepfake detection and media safety — detect AI-generated audio, images, video, and text, trace synthesis sources, apply watermarks, verify speaker identity, and analyze media intelligence using Resemble AI
quality-playbook
Run a complete quality engineering audit on any codebase. Derives behavioral requirements from the code, generates spec-traced functional tests, runs a three-pass code review with regression tests, executes a multi-model spec audit (Council of Three), and produces a consolidated bug report with TDD-verified patches. Finds the 35% of real defects that structural code review alone cannot catch. Works with any language. Trigger on 'quality playbook', 'spec audit', 'Council of Three', 'fitness-to-purpose', or 'coverage theater'.