ai-team-orchestration
Bootstrap and run a lightweight multi-agent development team. Use when starting or adopting a project, planning work, coordinating implementation and optional QA, brainstorming with distinct perspectives, or preserving context across sessions.
- License 许可
- MIT
- 最近更新
- 2026-11-13
- Stars
- ★ 4.1w
- Forks
- 5.3k
01 前言 Front Matter
- name
- ai-team-orchestration
- description
- Bootstrap and run a lightweight multi-agent development team. Use when starting or adopting a project, planning work, coordinating implementation and optional QA, brainstorming with distinct perspectives, or preserving context across sessions.
02 资源文件 4
- 参考文档references/anti-patterns.md2.5 KB
- 参考文档references/brainstorm-format.md3.9 KB
- 参考文档references/project-brief-template.md1.9 KB
- 参考文档references/sprint-plan-template.md2.3 KB
03 SKILL.md 正文
AI Team Orchestration
Use three stable agents:
| Agent | Purpose |
|---|---|
@ai-team-producer |
Clarify scope, plan proportionately, coordinate, and merge |
@ai-team-dev |
Implement, test, self-review, and prepare the pull request |
@ai-team-qa |
Independently test behavior when dedicated QA is useful |
Nova, Sage, and Milo are perspectives inside the Dev agent, not mandatory project layers.
Default Workflow
Plan -> Implement -> Test -> optional review or QA -> Merge -> update project state
Keep the workflow proportional:
- Skip formal planning for small, obvious changes.
- Use a short plan for multi-step or cross-cutting work.
- Add independent review or QA when risk, uncertainty, or repository policy justifies it.
- Let branch protection, required checks, permissions, and merge queues enforce repository merge policy.
Start or Adopt a Project
- Read existing repository instructions and documentation.
- Discover the actual stack, architecture, commands, deployment model, and risks.
- Create or update
PROJECT_BRIEF.mdonly when durable cross-session context is useful. Start from the project brief template and omit irrelevant sections. - For substantial work, create a concise plan from the sprint plan template.
- Use a separate branch or clone when parallel sessions could conflict, following the repository's own Git policy.
Execute
Producer
- Define the outcome, constraints, acceptance criteria, and explicit exclusions.
- Choose review and QA based on risk rather than ceremony.
- Keep durable project state concise and current.
Dev
- Follow repository conventions and implement the smallest complete solution.
- Run relevant checks and inspect the final diff.
- Open or update the pull request with summary, verification, and limitations.
QA
- Use only when dedicated behavioral verification adds value.
- Test the requested change and important regressions.
- Report reproducible findings and verify fixes.
Brainstorms
Use the brainstorm format for product or architecture decisions that benefit from competing perspectives. For ordinary implementation choices, let Dev decide using repository conventions.
Context Recovery
Before ending a long or interrupted session:
- Update the active plan or progress note if one exists.
- Record material decisions, blockers, and the next action in repository context.
- Use a cold-start prompt such as:
Read the repository instructions, then read whichever sources exist for this
work: the active issue or request, PROJECT_BRIEF.md, and the active plan or
progress note.
Continue from the recorded next action.
Tool and Model Inheritance
The bundled agents intentionally omit tools and model frontmatter:
- available built-in, MCP, and extension tools remain usable;
- developers keep control of model selection;
- role boundaries are defined by instructions and normal trust, permission, authentication, and approval controls.
If the environment exposes too many tools, deselect irrelevant tools or MCP servers, or use VS Code virtual-tool management. Do not add a machine-specific plugin allowlist.
Principles
- Prefer working software and clear handoffs over process artifacts.
- Follow repository policy instead of embedding universal Git commands.
- Preserve unknown work and ask before destructive or privileged actions.
- Keep bugs and important decisions in durable project systems, not only chat.
- See anti-patterns for concise lessons.
04 同仓库更多 Skills
supabase-rls-policies
Write, review, and test Supabase Row Level Security (RLS) policies so that one user cannot read or change another user's rows. Use when creating or changing tables, policies, views, or security definer functions in a Supabase project, when reviewing a migration that touches RLS, or when asked to prove user isolation with pgTAP tests that sign in as two users.
skill-distribution-audit
Audit a skill collection before release or investigate installer omissions, archived/template leakage, duplicate identities, and manifest drift. Reconcile the intended public source set, distribution manifest, and actual discovery output for a specified consumer version. Includes a deterministic set-comparison helper.
logicapps-custom-code-net10-migration
Migrate Azure Logic Apps Standard local-function custom-code projects from .NET 8 to .NET 10. Use for legacy Logic Apps custom-code workspace upgrades, project/package configuration, custom-worker settings, publication, and integrated VS Code debugging. Not for ordinary .NET applications, standalone Azure Functions, Consumption workflows, or cloud deployment.
winmd-api-search
Find and explore Windows desktop APIs. Use when building features that need platform capabilities — camera, file access, notifications, UI controls, AI/ML, sensors, networking, etc. Discovers the right API for a task and retrieves full type details (methods, properties, events, enumeration values).
resemble-detect
Deepfake detection and media safety — detect AI-generated audio, images, video, and text, trace synthesis sources, apply watermarks, verify speaker identity, and analyze media intelligence using Resemble AI
quality-playbook
Run a complete quality engineering audit on any codebase. Derives behavioral requirements from the code, generates spec-traced functional tests, runs a three-pass code review with regression tests, executes a multi-model spec audit (Council of Three), and produces a consolidated bug report with TDD-verified patches. Finds the 35% of real defects that structural code review alone cannot catch. Works with any language. Trigger on 'quality playbook', 'spec audit', 'Council of Three', 'fitness-to-purpose', or 'coverage theater'.