AGENT SKILL

acreadiness-policy

Help the user pick, write, or apply an AgentRC policy. Policies customise readiness scoring by disabling irrelevant checks, overriding impact/level, setting pass-rate thresholds, or chaining org baselines with team overrides. Use when the user asks about strict mode, AI-only scoring, custom weights, CI gating, or wants org-wide standardisation.

使用场景前端开发
License 许可
MIT
最近更新
2026-11-13
Stars
★ 4.1w
Forks
5.3k

01 前言 Front Matter

name
acreadiness-policy
description
Help the user pick, write, or apply an AgentRC policy. Policies customise readiness scoring by disabling irrelevant checks, overriding impact/level, setting pass-rate thresholds, or chaining org baselines with team overrides. Use when the user asks about strict mode, AI-only scoring, custom weights, CI gating, or wants org-wide standardisation.
argument-hint
[show | new <name> | apply <path-or-pkg>] — e.g. /acreadiness-policy show, /acreadiness-policy new strict-frontend

02 资源文件 1

03 SKILL.md 正文

/acreadiness-policy — AgentRC policies

Use this skill when the user asks about policies, strict mode, custom scoring, disabling checks, org standards, or CI gating of readiness.

A policy is a small JSON file with three optional sections — criteria, extras, thresholds — that customise how AgentRC scores readiness.

Built-in examples

AgentRC ships with three example policies in examples/policies/:

Policy What it does
strict.json 100% pass rate, raises impact on key criteria
ai-only.json Disables all repo-health checks, focuses on AI tooling
repo-health-only.json Disables AI checks, focuses on traditional quality

Recommend these as starting points before writing a custom policy.

Policy schema

{
  "name": "my-policy",
  "criteria": {
    "disable":  ["env-example", "observability", "dependabot"],
    "override": {
      "readme":      { "impact": "high", "level": 2 },
      "lint-config": { "title": "Linter required" }
    }
  },
  "extras": {
    "disable": ["pre-commit"]
  },
  "thresholds": {
    "passRate": 0.9
  }
}

Impact weights

Impact Weight
critical 5
high 4
medium 3
low 2
info 0

Score = 1 − (deductions / max possible weight). Grades: A ≥ 0.9, B ≥ 0.8, C ≥ 0.7, D ≥ 0.6, F < 0.6.

Sub-commands

show

List policies currently in effect (from agentrc.config.json policies array, or none).

new <name>

Scaffold policies/<name>.json with sensible defaults. Walk the user through:

  1. What to disable — irrelevant pillars or extras for their stack (e.g. disable observability for a static site).
  2. What to raise — override impact to high or critical for must-haves (e.g. readme, codeowners).
  3. Pass-rate threshold — typical org baselines: 0.7 (lenient), 0.85 (standard), 1.0 (strict).
  4. Reference the policy from agentrc.config.json:
    { "policies": ["./policies/<name>.json"] }
    

apply <path-or-pkg>

Run agentrc readiness --json --policy <source> and re-render the report by handing off to the assess skill / ai-readiness-reporter agent. Supports chaining:

npx -y github:microsoft/agentrc readiness --json --policy ./org-baseline.json,./team-frontend.json

CI gating

Combine policies with --fail-level to enforce a minimum maturity level in CI:

- run: npx -y github:microsoft/agentrc readiness --policy ./policies/strict.json --fail-level 3

Advanced

JSON policies can disable, override, and set thresholds — but cannot add new criteria. For new detection logic, point users at AgentRC's TypeScript plugin system (docs/dev/plugins.md).

Operating rules

  • Never silently disable a pillar. If the user wants to disable observability, confirm and explain the trade-off.
  • Prefer overriding impact over disabling. Disabling hides the gap entirely; overriding lets it still appear in the report.
  • Recommend extras stay enabled. They cost nothing — they don't affect the score.
  • Suggest layering — most orgs want a baseline policy + per-team overrides chained with --policy a.json,b.json.

04 同仓库更多 Skills

github
github/awesome-copilot

supabase-rls-policies

Write, review, and test Supabase Row Level Security (RLS) policies so that one user cannot read or change another user's rows. Use when creating or changing tables, policies, views, or security definer functions in a Supabase project, when reviewing a migration that touches RLS, or when asked to prove user isolation with pgTAP tests that sign in as two users.

测试与质量Skill与智能体开发
★ 4.1w
github
github/awesome-copilot

skill-distribution-audit

Audit a skill collection before release or investigate installer omissions, archived/template leakage, duplicate identities, and manifest drift. Reconcile the intended public source set, distribution manifest, and actual discovery output for a specified consumer version. Includes a deterministic set-comparison helper.

Skill与智能体开发
★ 4.1w
github
github/awesome-copilot

logicapps-custom-code-net10-migration

Migrate Azure Logic Apps Standard local-function custom-code projects from .NET 8 to .NET 10. Use for legacy Logic Apps custom-code workspace upgrades, project/package configuration, custom-worker settings, publication, and integrated VS Code debugging. Not for ordinary .NET applications, standalone Azure Functions, Consumption workflows, or cloud deployment.

开发工程师
★ 4.1w
github
github/awesome-copilot

winmd-api-search

Find and explore Windows desktop APIs. Use when building features that need platform capabilities — camera, file access, notifications, UI controls, AI/ML, sensors, networking, etc. Discovers the right API for a task and retrieves full type details (methods, properties, events, enumeration values).

开发工程师后端与接口
★ 4.1w
github
github/awesome-copilot

resemble-detect

Deepfake detection and media safety — detect AI-generated audio, images, video, and text, trace synthesis sources, apply watermarks, verify speaker identity, and analyze media intelligence using Resemble AI

后端与接口图像与多媒体
★ 4.1w
github
github/awesome-copilot

quality-playbook

Run a complete quality engineering audit on any codebase. Derives behavioral requirements from the code, generates spec-traced functional tests, runs a three-pass code review with regression tests, executes a multi-model spec audit (Council of Three), and produces a consolidated bug report with TDD-verified patches. Finds the 35% of real defects that structural code review alone cannot catch. Works with any language. Trigger on 'quality playbook', 'spec audit', 'Council of Three', 'fitness-to-purpose', or 'coverage theater'.

代码审查Skill与智能体开发
★ 4.1w